1 / 22

P13031 - Jib Transfer Bench

P13031 - Jib Transfer Bench. Team Members: Mike Walsh, Nick Davis, Charley Kowalyshyn , Zeb Koch Guides: Kate Leipold , Dr. DeBartolo. Project Description. Project Motivation: To provide an expanded and enhanced sailing experience for sailors with varying disabilities Project Goal:

menefer
Télécharger la présentation

P13031 - Jib Transfer Bench

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. P13031 - Jib Transfer Bench Team Members: Mike Walsh, Nick Davis, Charley Kowalyshyn, Zeb Koch Guides: Kate Leipold, Dr. DeBartolo

  2. Project Description Project Motivation: • To provide an expanded and enhanced sailing experience for sailors with varying disabilities Project Goal: • To design a mechanical solution to move a jib trimmer from side to side on a Sonar class sailboat, allowing them to function as a member of the crew.

  3. Concept Summary • Concept heavily influenced by space constraint required due to Captain’s Chair • 23”front to back available • Cantilevered design fit best in space constraint • Rotational and translational movement required for jib trimmer

  4. Customer Needs Recap • Gary & Zak • No leg mobility / core support • Desires to be fully secured • Cindy • Partial leg & core strength • Desires freedom to exit seat when necessary • Limited footprint available due to P13032’s chair • Cindy needs the option to sail with Gold Medal Chair or as a standalone device

  5. Design Summary • Two systems were to be built, requiring a comprehensive design to fit varying needs • Cantilevered seat – most viable option to fulfill needs at expense of weight, time and money

  6. System Architecture • Main components: • Baseplate platform • Side seat platforms • Bench • Lazy susan • Seat • Purchase system • Handholds • Points of contact with the boat are: • Baseplate, side seat platforms, handholds, purchase system

  7. Baseplate • Modeled on previous baseplate • Legs are bolted through metal plate underneath • Base clamps to bilge cover • Allows adjustability – forward and backward

  8. Side Seat Platforms • Protects boat from interference with jib transfer bench • Provides surface to distribute any forces from system • Parts of purchase system mounted to these platforms

  9. Bench • Pillow block and carriage provide linear motion on bar and track • Most expensive component in system • Heaviest component • Most complex to install

  10. Lazy Susan and Seat • Durable lazy susan • Greased bearings • Rigid against torque • Provides enough friction for braking, but allows easy rotation too

  11. Handholds • Provide adjustability to any Sonar handhold • Slides along 80/20 in X-Direction • 80/20 design allows for rotation to perfect angle • Slots in plates allow for extension into handhold cups • Turnbuckle gives max adjustability and security

  12. Purchase System • Mounted behind occupant. Travels the width of device • Designed to give a 3-1 advantage

  13. Purchase System

  14. Cindy’s System w/o Captain’s Chair • Top of swivel stool used • Lap belt for support

  15. Cindy’s System w/ Captain’s Chair • System moved forward on baseplate with front handhold used • Limits space for Cindy to move

  16. Zak & Gary’s System • Bucket seat and 5-point harness provide support • Leg supports

  17. Testing Results

  18. Testing Results (continued)

  19. Testing Results (continued)

  20. Evaluation: Success and Failure • System is overweight • Had to be robust due to space limitation • System is expensive • System is unable to be manufactured on a large scale in its current design • Some specifications are not feasible • Adjusting for multiple configurations is time consuming

  21. Suggestions for Future Work Zeb worked on the PRP to iterate this project again in the 2014 school year • Eliminate space constraint due to Captain’s Chair • Reduce weight • Reduce cost • More off-the-shelf parts • Less machining • Better corrosion resistance • Re-evaluate specs • Evaluate feedback on rotation – if it needs a brake mechanism

  22. Questions, Comments?

More Related