1 / 17

INT, 05/18/2011

MC sampling of skeleton Feynman diagrams: Road to solution for interacting fermions/spins?. Nikolay Prokofiev, Umass, Amherst. work done in collaboration with . + proof from Nature. Boris Svistunov UMass. Kris van Houcke UMass, U. Gent. Evgeny Kozik ETH. Felix Werner

meris
Télécharger la présentation

INT, 05/18/2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MC sampling of skeleton Feynman diagrams: Road to solution for interacting fermions/spins? Nikolay Prokofiev, Umass, Amherst work done in collaboration with + proof from Nature Boris Svistunov UMass Kris van Houcke UMass, U. Gent Evgeny Kozik ETH Felix Werner UMass, ENS MIT group: Mrtin Zwierlein, Mark Ku, Ariel Sommer, Lawrence Cheuk, Andre Schirotzek INT, 05/18/2011

  2. Feynman Diagrams: graphical representation for the high-order perturbation theory Feynman diagrams have become our everyday’s language. “Particle A scatters off particle B by exchanging a particle C … “

  3. Diagrammatic technique: admits partial resummation and self-consistent formulation Calculate irreducible diagrams for , , … to get , , …. from Dyson equations Dyson Equation: Screening: Ladders: (contact potential) More tools: (naturally incorporating Dynamic mean-field theory solutions) Higher “level”: diagrams based on effective objects (ladders), irreducible 3-point vertex …

  4. Feynman Diagrams Physics of strongly correlated many-body systems, i.e. no small parameters: Are they useful in higher orders? And if they are, how one can handle billions of skeleton graphs?

  5. Skeleton diagrams up to high-order: do they make sense for ? NO Dyson: Expansion in powers of g is asymptotic if for some (e.g. complex) g one finds pathological behavior. Electron gas: Bosons: [collapse to infinite density] Math. Statement: # of skeleton graphs asymptotic series with zero conv. radius (n! beats any power) Diverge for large even if are convergent for small . Asymptotic series for with zero convergence radius

  6. Skeleton diagrams up to high-order: do they make sense for ? YES # of graphs is but due to sign-blessing they may compensate each other to accuracy better then leading to finite conv. radius • Dyson: • Does not apply to the resonant Fermi gas and the Fermi-Hubbard model at finite T. • not known if it applies to skeleton graphs which are NOT series in bare : • e.g. the BCS theory answer • (lowest-order diagrams) • - Regularization techniques are available. Divergent series far outside of convergence radius can be re-summed. From strong coupling theories based on one lowest-order diagram To accurate unbiased theories based on billions of diagrams and limit

  7. Re-summation of divergent series with finite convergence radius. Example: бред какойто Gauss Define a function such that: Lindeloef Construct sums and extrapolate to get

  8. Configuration space = (diagram order, topology and types of lines, internal variables) Diagram order MC update MC update Computational complexity is factorial : Diagram topology This is NOT: write diagram after diagram, compute its value, sum

  9. Resonant Fermions: Universal results in the zero-range, , and thermodynamic limit Unitary gas: .

  10. Skeleton graphs based on all ladder diagrams Useful ‘bold’ relations:

  11. resummation and extrapolation for density controls contributing diagram orders

  12. Unitary gas EOS (full story in previous talks) (in the universal & thermodynamic limit with quantifiable error bars) Goulko, Wingate ‘10 (calculated independently and cross-checked for universality)

  13. Critical point from pair distribution function Mean-field behavior: Criticality: from

  14. Burovski et. al ’06, Kozik et. al ‘08 Goulko & Wingate ‘10

  15. Conclusions/perspectives Diag.MC for skeleton graphs works all the way to the critical point Phase diagrams for strongly correlated states can be done, generically Res. Fermions: population imbalance, mass imbalance, etc Fermi-Hubbard model (any filling) Coulomb gas Frustrated magnetism …

  16. Cut one line – interpret the rest as self-energy for this line:

More Related