1 / 44

MEDG 505 Pharmacogenomics March 17, 2005 A. Brooks-Wilson

MEDG 505 Pharmacogenomics March 17, 2005 A. Brooks-Wilson. Reminder: What is Genomics?. According to http://genomics.ucdavis.edu/what.html : “Genomics is operationally defined as investigations into the structure and function of very large numbers of genes

merrill
Télécharger la présentation

MEDG 505 Pharmacogenomics March 17, 2005 A. Brooks-Wilson

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MEDG 505PharmacogenomicsMarch 17, 2005A. Brooks-Wilson

  2. Reminder: What is Genomics? According to http://genomics.ucdavis.edu/what.html: “Genomics is operationally defined as investigations into the structure and function of very large numbers of genes undertaken in a simultaneous fashion”

  3. Pharmacogenetics • “The study of how genes affect people’s response to medicines” (NIH) • A subset of complex genetics for which the traits relate to drugs • First observed in 1957 • Part of “personalized medicine” • 20-95% of variability in drug disposition and effects is thought to be genetic • Non-genetic factors: age, interacting medications, organ function • Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion • >30 families of genes

  4. Pharmacogenetics: Examples • Drug metabolism genes • NAT2, isoniazid anti-tuberculosis drug hepatotoxicity • CYP3A5, many drugs • Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT), 6-thioguanine • Drug targets (receptors) • B2 Adrenergic Receptor, inhaled B agonists for asthma • Drug transporters • P-glycoprotein (ABCB1, MDR1), resistance to anti-epileptic drugs • The examples known today are those that come closest to simple genetic traits

  5. Potential Consequences • Extended / shortened pharmacological effect • Adverse drug reactions • Lack of pro-drug activation • Increased / decreased effective dose • Metabolism by alternative, deleterious pathways • Exacerbated drug-drug interactions

  6. The Goal of Pharmacogenomics Picture from Perlegen website: www.perlegen.com

  7. Complex Genetics: Concepts • Family studies vs. population studies • Penetrance • Genetic heterogeneity • Linkage vs. association • Haplotypes in family and association studies • Genetic variation, SNPs • Genotyping

  8. Types of Genetic Studies • Family studies • multi-generation families • Association studies • Case / control (easiest to collect)

  9. Penetrance • Penetrance = the proportion of carriers who show the phenotype • Expressivity = severity of the phenotype

  10. Genetic Heterogeneity • Locus heterogeneity (what we usually refer to when we talk about genetic heterogeneity) • Allelic heterogeneity

  11. Family Studies Identify Highly Penetrant Mutations High penetrance disease allele(s) Availability of suitable families is the limiting factor Family studies are effective for only a minority of conditions

  12. Association Studies Can Identify Variants with High or Low Penetrance • Case / control groups • Not limited to high penetrance alleles • Amenable to the study of gene-environment interactions • A preferred approach for the majority of complex genetic disorders

  13. Complex Diseases / Phenotypes • Multigenic (genetic heterogeneity) • Environmental effects (multiple) • Gene-gene interactions • Gene-environment interactions (for pharmacogenetic traits: age, alcohol consumption, hepatitis exposure, etc.) • Association studies will hold up under these complications but family-based linkage studies will not!

  14. Linkage vs. Association • Linkage is to a locus • different families can be linked to the same locus but have different disease alleles • how to take advantage of this in proving a gene is responsible for a disease • Association is with an allele • done in groups or populations • the allele arose and was propagated in the population; the haplotype was degraded by recombination

  15. Genetic Markers SNPs: Substitutions, for example, C / T Most common type of genetic variation Ideal for association mapping over short distances 1 SNP every ~ 200 base pairs in a population 1 SNP every ~1000 base pairs between 2 individuals dbSNP: >10M putative SNPs, > 5M validated SNPs Microsatellites: (CA)n or other short repeats More polymorphic than SNPs Less common than SNPs 1 polymorphic microsatellite per ~ 100,000 base pairs Best for linkage mapping over long distances, in families

  16. SNPs • Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms • Can also use “Indels”, though some investigators throw them away! • Synonymous, non-synonymous SNPs • Mutation vs. polymorphism vs. variant or variation • The 1% definition

  17. SNP Databases • dbSNP (more than just human) • Human Genome Variation Database • At least 11 others! • ~ 10 million SNPs with minor allele >1% • ~ 7 million SNPs with minor allele >5% • ~ 50,000 non-synonymous SNPs in the human genome

  18. Case / Control Studies • Collect blood samples from patients and controls, with consent • Establish database of clinical and epidemiological data • Select ‘candidate’ genes of interest for each trait • Sequence the candidate genes in a small group of patients • Genotype selected variants in case / control groups • Analyze for association with a phenotype • Analyze for gene-gene and gene-environment interactions • Genetic, Ethical, Legal and Social (GELS) issues investigations

  19. Linkage Disequilibrium • The difference between the observed frequency of a haplotype and its expected frequency if all alleles were segregating randomly • For adjacent loci: A,a B,b • D = PAB - PA x PB • D is dependent on allele frequencies • Other related measures also used

  20. Human haplotype blocks . . . Ancestral chromosomes Observed pattern of historical recombination in common haplotypes Rather than 50 kb

  21. . . . Simplify association studies SNP1 SNP2 Ancestral chromosomes A C A C G T T G A disease-causing mutation arises * A A C A C G T T G G Association with nearby SNPs * T G C A A T G G A C Location of mutation Gene

  22. LD and Association • Direct association • asks about the effect of a variant • if negative, the gene may still be involved! • Indirect association • uses LD • can be more convincingly negative if haplotypes are assessed

  23. Haplotype Blocks • Became clear in October 2001 • 87% of the genome is in blocks ~> 30 kb • Not all of the genome is in haplotype blocks! • Average block 22 kb, 11kb in African populations (Gabriel et al, 2002) • A few common haplotypes at a given locus in a given population • African populations generally have the greatest number of haplotypes and the shortest haplotype blocks • Strength of LD and size of blocks varies greatly between regions

  24. How to Generate Haplotypes • Haplotyping in families • Physical determination • long-range PCR, separation of molecules • cloning of single molecules • labor intensive • Estimate haplotype frequencies • Expectation Maximization algorithm, others • generate frequencies for case group, control group

  25. Tag SNPs Chromosome copy 1 Chromosome copy 2 Chromosome copy 3 Chromosome copy 4

  26. The HapMap • Reference map for association studies • Expected to reduce the number of markers required to conduct effective genome scans for association • 270 samples from 4 populations: • 30 Yoruban trios (Nigeria) • 45 unrelated Japanese (Tokyo) • 45 unrelated Chinese (Beijing) • 30 U.S. trios (CEPH, N/W European ancestry) • >400,000 markers genotyped in all samples, nearly 1M in CEPH trios

  27. Strategies • Candidate gene based studies • hypothesis-driven • must guess (one of) the right gene(s)!! • Current state of the art • Genome scans • “hypothesis-free” • scans of ~ 1 million markers are now possible

  28. SNP Discovery is Still Necessary • Many have been found by multi-read sequence mining • Directed public SNP discovery in certain sets of genes, e.g.: • SNP500Cancer • Environmental Genome Project (EGP) • Individuals used usually “unaffected”

  29. SNP Discovery All exons and regulatory regions of each gene Identify regulatory regions by comparative genomics Bi-directional sequencing Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography (DHPLC) Other methods

  30. 1 2 PCR Set-up: Packard Multiprobe II liquid handler Template aliquotting: Robbins Hydra 3 Purification of PCR Products: Agencourt PCR and cycle sequencing: MJ Tetrads 6 Sequencing: ABI 3700s 5 PCR products Cycle Sequencing 4

  31. SNP Discovery: PolyPhred and Consed PolyPhred: Debbie Nickerson; Consed, Phil Green

  32. GG GA AA Sample Output

  33. Genotyping, Technology • Determining the allele(s) present in a particular sample at a particular (SNP) marker • Many methods

  34. TaqMan (ABI): Uniplex genotyping

  35. TaqMan

  36. Homozygous 1,1 Heterozygous Homozygous 2,2 TaqMan Output

  37. Allele 2 Allele 1 Allele 2 Allele 1 EXTEND Primer EXTEND Primer EXTEND Primer G A A T MassEXTEND REACTION Allele 1 Allele 2 Unlabeled Primer (23-mer) Same Primer (23-mer) TCT ACT +Enzyme +ddATP +dCTP/dGTP/dTTP Extended Primer (24-mer) Extended Primer (26-mer) A C T T C T Diagram courtesy of Sequenom

  38. * T C * CT * A G * AG * AG Sequenom MassARRAY: < 12-plex Diagram courtesy of Sequenom

  39. Illumina BeadArray System: 1152-plex • 1152-fold multiplexing • 0.26 ng of genomic DNA per genotype • $ 0.05 USD per genotype

  40. B A Illumina BeadArray System

  41. ParAllele Molecular Inversion Probes: 10,000 Plex

  42. Affymetrix Whole Genome Sampling Analysis: 500,000-plex Kennedy et al., 2003

  43. Affymetrix: Allele-Specific Hybridization PM = perfect match MM = mismatch

  44. DNA Pooling Strategies • Reduce the number of genotypes and genotyping cost, particularly for whole genome scans • Pool of case DNAs vs. pool of control DNAs • DNAs must be mixed in precisely equimolar proportions in the pools! • Requires a quantitative genotyping technique • E.g. 40% in cases vs. 20% in controls • Verify positives by genotyping individual samples

More Related