1 / 8

Observed Nodal Credit Issues

Observed Nodal Credit Issues. MCWG – 12/10/2010. Observations. Day-Ahead Market Expiring CRRs do not offset calculated DAM Exposure TPE Collateral requirements related to RT-DA Spreads are excessive E-Factors do not incorporate PTP transactions CRR Exposure Calculations (Auction & FCE)

metta
Télécharger la présentation

Observed Nodal Credit Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Observed Nodal Credit Issues MCWG – 12/10/2010

  2. Observations • Day-Ahead Market • Expiring CRRs do not offset calculated DAM Exposure • TPE Collateral requirements related to RT-DA Spreads are excessive • E-Factors do not incorporate PTP transactions • CRR Exposure Calculations (Auction & FCE) • Auction exposure calculations overlook maximum risk associated with bid curves • Auction & FCE exposure calculations do not recognize offsetting risk

  3. Forward Hedge pre DAM: Resource Position 10 MWh Load Position 10 MWh CRR Position (Bus-Zone) 10 MWh DAM Transaction and Exposure: Option #1 (E1=0, D=100, Y&Z= 50) 10MWh, $0 TPO @ Resource =$ -50 10MWh, $200 EOB @ Zone = $ 100 Option # 2 (Uth =5) 10MWh, $50 PTP Bid Bus-Zone = $55 1 Expiring CRRs do not offset calculated DAM Exposure Ex: Posting Requirements related to a QSE representing load and generation 2 Net Position 0 MWh • Settlements & Invoices post DAM: • (Zone SPP = $100; GenBus SPP = $50) • @ Resource = $50 * 10MWh = $500 • @ Zone = $100 * -10MWh = $-1000 • @ CRR = [$100-$50] * 10MWh = $500 • Possible Solutions: • Recognize Expiring CRRs in/pre DAM • Enable CRRs to flow through to RT • Permit E-Factors to recognize offsetting risk • other 3 Net Exposure $0.00

  4. 1MW Buy DAM and Sell RT 1MW Sell DAM and Buy RT Virtual DA-RT Spreads are Over Collateralized by TPE Equations Assumption: E1 = 1; E2 = 0; PDAM =$40; PRT =$60 Assumption: E1=1; E2=0; PDAM=$60; PRT=$40; RT-DA=$10 Over Collateralization ≈ 64x Over Collateralization≈ 160x Under Collateralization≈ 7x • Reason for Collateralization Mismatch: • DAM & RT invoicing cycles are not aligned; thus, creating an unnecessary posting requirement for payment risk related to one leg of the financial time spread • Extrapolation equations overestimate potential exposure

  5. E-Factors do not incorporate PTP transactions Real Time Congestion Exposure can be managed by purchasing a PTP Day-Ahead, or by Transacting a Bid @ the Sink and Offer @ at the Source. • Ex. TPO & Bid @ Zone Transactions with the same risk profile but different E-Factor Treatment • Ex. PTP (Gen– Zone) • Ex. E-Factor Alt for PTP DAM Settlements 10MWh TPO = $50 10MWh EOB = $100 DAM Settlements 10MWh PTP Bid Bus-Zone = $50 DAM Settlements 10MWh, $50 PTP Bid Bus-Zone = $50 E-Ratio Calculations E-Ratio Calculations E-Ratio Calculations E1 Ratio= Min[1, Max[0, ((Qcleared-Bids*PDAM + Qcleared-PTPs*PSinkDAM - Qcleared-TPO*PDAM - Qcleared-EOO*PDAM -Qcleared-PTPs*PSourceDAM) / (Qcleared-Bids*PDAM + Qcleared-PTPs*PSinkDAM)]] = Min[ 1, Max[ 0, ($100 - $50)/$100]] = 0.50 E1 Ratio = Min[1, Max[ 0, ($0 - $0)/$0]] = 0 E1 Ratio = Min[1, Max[ 0, ($100 - $50)/$100]] = 0.50 E2 Ratio = 1 - Max[0, ((Qcleared-EOO + Qcleared-TPO - Qcleared-Bids)/((Qcleared-EOO + Qcleared-TPO + Qcleared-PTP))] = 1 – Max[0, (10 -10)/10] = 1 E2 Ratio = 1 – Max[0, (0 -0)/0] = 1 E2 Ratio = 1 – Max[0, (10 -10)/10] = 1 Incorporating PTPs into the E-Factor Equations provides equality for counterparties managing congestion risk

  6. CRR Bid Example & Clearing Price Max Price Exposure Example CRR Auction exposure calculations overlook maximum risk associated with bid curves 10 • 10MW 5x16 OBL (NHub,NZ) @ $10 • 500MW5x16 OBL (NHub,NZ) @ $2 • 600MW5x16 OBL (NHub,NZ) @ $1 • PCleared = $1/MWh ; 1,110MW Awarded Max Exp = $1/MWh A $100 2 23% Savings Bid Price ($/MW) B $1020 1 • CRR Auction Exposure(5x16 ≈ 336hrs) C $1110 Exp = [(M+1) * │PBid│ + A] * Q 10 510 1110 Quantity (MW) • [(0+1) * $10 + 0.75] * 10 * 336 = $36,120 • [(0+1) * $2 + 0.75] * 500 * 336 = $462,000 • [(0+1) * $1 + 0.75] * 600 * 336 = $352,800 • Total Exposure = $850,920 Alt. Exp = [(M+1)*Max[0,Min[ PMaxExp,PBid]+ A ]] *Q • [(0+1) * $1 + 0.75] * 10 * 336 = $5,880 • [(0+1) * $1 + 0.75] * 500 * 336 = $294,000 • [(0+1) * $1 + 0.75] * 600 * 336 = $352,800 • Total Exposure = $652,680

  7. CRR Auction Exposure Auction & FCE exposure calculations do not recognize offsetting risk A CRRAH managing Gen Bus to Load Zone congestion risk by legging into a GenBus to Zone CRR requires more collateral than purchasing a CRR from GenBus to Zone • Auction Submissions • Auction Cleared Values 10MW 5x16 OBL (NGen,NH) @ $10 10MW 5x16 OBL (NH,NZ) @ $10 10MW 5x16 OBL (NGen,NH) @ $0.75 10MW 5x16 OBL (NH,NZ) @ $0.75 Bid #1: Bid #2: 10MW 5x16 OBL (NGen,NZ) @ $20 10MW 5x16 OBL (NGen,NZ) @ $1.5 Recognizing offsetting CRR Exposure (i.e. SinkCRR1 = SourceCRR2) reduces FCE posting requirements by 50% • Future Credit Exposure = [ $10 + $0.75] * 3,360 = $36,120 = [ $10 + $0.75] * 3,360 = $36,120 Total = $72,240 ACPE = $3,360 ; FMM = $2,520 ACPE = $3,360 ; FMM = $2,520 Total = $6,720 Bid #1: Current Calculations Bid #2: = [ $20 + $0.75] * 3,360 = $69,720 = Max [ $3,360 ; -$5,040] = $3,360 Exp = [(M+1) * │PBid│ + A] * Q A = $0.75, M=0 FCE = Max[ ACPE , - FMM ] W1=100%, X=1, Y=1.5 Where:

  8. Other Issues Previously Discussed • Day-Ahead Market • Negative EO Bids do not require collateralization • Exposure calculations overlook maximum risk associated with Bid Curves • CRR Exposure Calculations (Auction & FCE) • Annual Auction Pre-Payment Requirements & Adequacy of FCE calculations • Collateral Requirements for Negative Bids • Adequacy of “A”, “X”, and “Y”

More Related