1 / 50

Computer Graphics Implementation I

Computer Graphics Implementation I. Algorithms for Drawing 2D Primitives. Line Drawing Algorithms DDA algorithm Midpoint algorithm Bresenham’s line algorithm Circle Generating Algorithms Bresenham’s circle algorithm Extension to Ellipse drawing. Line Drawing. Line Drawing

mick
Télécharger la présentation

Computer Graphics Implementation I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer Graphics ImplementationI

  2. Algorithms for Drawing 2D Primitives • Line Drawing Algorithms • DDA algorithm • Midpoint algorithm • Bresenham’s line algorithm • Circle Generating Algorithms • Bresenham’s circle algorithm • Extension to Ellipse drawing

  3. Line Drawing

  4. Line Drawing Draw a line on a raster screen between two points What’s wrong with statement of problem? doesn’t say anything about which points are allowed as endpoints doesn’t give a clear meaning of “draw” doesn’t say what constitutes a “line” in raster world doesn’t say how to measure success of proposed algorithms Problem Statement Given two points P and Q in XY plane, both with integer coordinates, determine which pixels on raster screen should be on in order to make picture of a unit-width line segment starting at P and ending at Q Scan Converting Lines

  5. Special case: Horizontal Line: Draw pixel P and increment x coordinate value by 1 to get next pixel. Vertical Line: Draw pixel P and increment y coordinate value by 1 to get next pixel. Diagonal Line: Draw pixel P and increment both x and y coordinate by 1 to get next pixel. What should we do in general case? => Fast - Digital differential analyzer (DDA) algorithm - Mid-point algorithm - Bresenham algorithm Finding next pixel:

  6. Scan Conversion of Line Segments • Start with line segment in window coordinates with integer values for endpoints • Assume implementation has a write_pixel function y = mx + h

  7. Basic Algorithm Find equation of line that connects two points P(x1,y1) and Q(x2,y2) Starting with leftmost point P, increment xi by 1 to calculate yi= m*xi+ h where m = slope, h = y intercept Draw pixel at (xi, Round(yi)) where Round (yi) = Floor (0.5 + yi)

  8. Strategy 1 – DDA Algorithm • Digital Differential Analyzer • DDA was a mechanical device for numerical solution of differential equations • Line y=mx+ h satisfies differential equation dy/dx = m = Dy/Dx = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) • Along scan line Dx = 1 For(x=x1; x<=x2,x++) { y+=m; write_pixel(x, round(y), line_color) }

  9. Example Code // Incremental Line Algorithm // Assume x0 < x1 void Line(int x0, int y0, int x1, int y1) { int x, y; float dy = y1 – y0; float dx = x1 – x0; float m = dy / dx; y = y0; for (x = x0; x < x1; x++) { WritePixel(x, Round(y)); y = y + m; } }

  10. Problem • DDA = for each x plot pixel at closest y • Problems for steep lines

  11. Using Symmetry • Use for 1  m  0 • For m > 1, swap role of x and y • For each y, plot closest x

  12. Problem void Line(int x0, int y0, int x1, int y1) { int x, y; float dy = y1 – y0; float dx = x1 – x0; float m = dy / dx; y = y0; for (x = x0; x < x1; x++) { WritePixel(x, Round(y)); y = y + m; } } Rounding takes time

  13. Assume that line’s slope is shallow and positive (0 < slope < 1); other slopes can be handled by suitable reflections about principle axes Call lower left endpoint (x0, y0) and upper right endpoint (x1, y1) Assume that we have just selected pixel P at (xp, yp) Next, we must choose between pixel to right (E pixel) (xp+1, yp), or one right and one up (NE pixel) (xp+1, yp+1) Let Q be intersection point of line being scan-converted and vertical line x=xp+1 Strategy 2 – Midpoint Line Algorithm (1/3)

  14. Strategy 2 – Midpoint Line Algorithm (2/3) NE pixel Q Midpoint M E pixel Previous pixel Choices for current pixel Choices for next pixel

  15. Line passes between E and NE Point that is closer to intersection point Q must be chosen Observe on which side of line midpoint M lies: E is closer to line if midpoint M lies above line, i.e., line crosses bottom half NE is closer to line if midpoint M lies below line, i.e., line crosses top half Error (vertical distance between chosen pixel and actual line) is always <= ½ NE pixel Q M E pixel Strategy 2 – Midpoint Line Algorithm (3/3) • Algorithm chooses NE as next pixel for line shown • Now, need to find a way to calculate on which side of line midpoint lies

  16. Line equation as function f(x): Line equation as implicit function: for coefficients a, b, c, where a, b ≠ 0 from above, Properties (proof by case analysis): f(xm, ym) = 0 when any point M is on line f(xm, ym) < 0 when any point M is above line f(xm, ym) > 0 when any point M is below line Our decision will be based on value of function at midpoint M at (xp + 1, yp + ½) Line

  17. void MidpointLine(int x0, int y0, int x1, int y1) { int dx = x1 - x0; int dy = y1 - y0; int x = x0; int y = y0; float c = y0 * dx – dy * x0; writePixel(x, y); x++; while (x < x1) { d = dy * x – (y + 0.5) * dx + c; if (d > 0) { // Northeast Case y++; } writePixel(x, y); x++; } /* while */ }

  18. Decision Variable d: We only need sign of f(xp+ 1, yp + ½) to see where line lies, and then pick nearest pixel d = f(xp + 1, yp + ½) - if d > 0 choose pixel NE - if d < 0 choose pixel E - if d = 0 choose either one consistently How do we incrementally update d? On basis of picking E or NE, figure out location of M for that pixel, and corresponding value d for next grid line We can derive d for the next pixel based on our current decision Decision Variable

  19. Increment M by one in x direction dnew = f(xp + 2, yp + ½) = a(xp + 2) + b(yp + ½) + c dold = a(xp + 1)+ b(yp + ½)+ c dnew - dold is the incremental difference E dnew= dold+ a E= a = dy We can compute value of decision variable at next step incrementally without computing F(M) directly dnew= dold + E= dold+ dy E can be thought of as correction or update factor to take dold to dnew It is referred to as forward difference Strategy 3 – Bresenham algorithm If E was chosen:

  20. Increment M by one in both x and y directions dnew= F(xp + 2, yp + 3/2) = a(xp + 2)+ b(yp + 3/2)+ c NE = dnew – dold dnew = dold + a + b NE = a + b = dy – dx Thus, incrementally, dnew = dold + NE = dold + dy – dx If NE was chosen:

  21. At each step, algorithm chooses between 2 pixels based on sign of decision variable calculated in previous iteration. It then updates decision variable by adding either E or NE to old value depending on choice of pixel. Simple additions only! First pixel is first endpoint (x0, y0), so we can directly calculate initial value of d for choosing between E and NE. Summary (1/2)

  22. First midpoint for first d = dstartis at (x0 + 1, y0 + ½) f(x0 + 1, y0 + ½) = a(x0 + 1) + b(y0 + ½) + c = a * x0 + b * y0 + c + a + b/2 = f(x0, y0) + a + b/2 But (x0, y0) is point on line and f(x0, y0) = 0 Therefore, dstart = a + b/2 = dy – dx/2 use dstart to choose second pixel, etc. To eliminate fraction in dstart : redefine f by multiplying it by 2; f(x,y) = 2(ax + by + c) this multiplies each constant and decision variable by 2, but does not change sign Summary (2/2)

  23. Example Code void Bresenham(int x0, int y0, int x1, int y1) { int dx = x1 - x0; int dy = y1 - y0; int d = 2 * dy - dx; int incrE = 2 * dy; int incrNE = 2 * (dy - dx); int x = x0; int y = y0; writePixel(x, y); while (x < x1) { if (d <= 0) { // East Case d = d + incrE; } else { // Northeast Case d = d + incrNE; y++; } x++; writePixel(x, y); } /* while */ } /* MidpointLine */

  24. Drawing Circles

  25. Bresenham’s Circle Algorithm • Circle Equation • (x-xc)2 + (y- yc)2 = R2 • Problem simplifying • Making the circle origin (xc, yc) in the coordinate origin • Symmetry points(y,x), (y,-x),(x,-y),(-x,-y),(-y,-x),(-y,x),(-x,y)

  26. Scan Converting Circles (0, 17) (0, 17) (17, 0) (17, 0) • Version 1: really bad • For x = – R to R • y = sqrt(R *R – x *x); • Pixel (round(x), round(y)); • Pixel (round(x), round(-y)); • Version 2: slightly less bad • For x = 0 to 360 • Pixel (round (R • cos(x)), round(R • sin(x)));

  27. Suppose circle origin is (xc,yc), radius is R. Let D(x, y) = (x-xc)2+(y-yc)2–R2 If point(x,y) is outside the circle, D(x,y)>0。 If point(x,y) is inside the circle, D(x,y)<0。 (xc, yc)

  28. (xi, yi) (xi+1, yi) (xi+1, yi-1) (xi, yi-1) (xi, yi) (xi+1, yi) (xi+1, yi-1) (xi, yi-1) Bresenham’s Circle Algorithm Two choice: (xi+1, yi) or (xi+1, yi-1)

  29. Use Symmetry (x0 + a, y0 + b) R (x0, y0) (x-x0)2 + (y-y0)2 = R2 • Symmetry: If (x0 + a, y0 + b) is on circle • also (x0± a, y0± b) and (x0± b, y0± a); hence 8-way symmetry. • Reduce the problem to finding the pixels for 1/8 of the circle

  30. Scan top right 1/8 of circle of radius R Circle starts at (x0, y0 + R) Let’s use another incremental algorithm with decision variable evaluated at midpoint Using the Symmetry (x0, y0)

  31. x = x0; y = y0 + R; Pixel(x, y); for (x = x0+1; (x – x0) < (y – y0); x++) { if (decision_var < 0) { /* move east */ update decision_var; } else { /* move south east */ update decision_var; y--; } Pixel(x, y); } Sketch of Incremental Algorithm E SE

  32. Decision variable negative if we move E, positive if we move SE (or vice versa). Follow line strategy: Use implicit equation of circle f(x,y) = x2 + y2 – R2 = 0 f(x,y) is zero on circle, negative inside, positive outside If we are at pixel (x, y) examine (x + 1, y) and (x + 1, y – 1) Compute f at the midpoint What we need for Incremental Algorithm

  33. Decision Variable Evaluate f(x,y) = x2 + y2 – R2 at the point We are asking: “Is positive or negative?” (it is zero on circle) If negative, midpoint inside circle, choose E vertical distance to the circle is less at (x + 1, y) than at (x + 1, y–1). If positive, opposite is true, choose SE æ ö 1 + - ç ÷ x 1 , y 2 è ø 2 æ ö æ ö 1 1 + - = + + - - 2 2 ç ÷ ç ÷ f x 1 , y ( x 1 ) y R 2 ø è 2 ø è E P = (xp, yp) M ME SE MSE

  34. Decision based on vertical distance Ok for lines, since d and dvertare proportional For circles, not true: Which d is closer to zero? (i.e. which of the two values below is closer to R): The right decision variable? + = + + - 2 2 d (( x 1 , y ), Circ ) ( x 1 ) y R + - = + + - - 2 2 d (( x 1 , y 1 ), Circ ) ( x 1 ) ( y 1 ) R + + + + - 2 2 2 2 ( x 1 ) y or ( x 1 ) ( y 1 )

  35. We could ask instead: “Is (x + 1)2 + y2 or (x + 1)2 + (y – 1)2 closer to R2?” The two values in equation above differ by Alternate Phrasing (1/3) + + - + + - = - 2 2 2 2 [( x 1 ) y ] [( x 1 ) ( y 1 ) ] 2 y 1 (0, 17) fE = 12 + 172 = 290 (1, 17) E fSE = 12 + 162 = 257 (1, 16) SE fE – fSE = 290 – 257 = 33 2y – 1 = 2(17) – 1 = 33

  36. The second value, which is always less, is closer if its difference from R2 is less than i.e., if then so so so Alternate Phrasing (2/3) æ ö 1 - ç ÷ ( 2 y 1 ) 2 è ø - + + - 2 2 2 R [( x 1 ) ( y 1 ) ] 1 - y ( 2 1 ) < 2 1 2 2 2 < - + + + - - 0 y ( x 1 ) ( y 1 ) R 2 1 2 2 2 < + + - + + - - 0 ( x 1 ) y 2 y 1 y R 2 1 2 2 2 < + + - + - 0 ( x 1 ) y y R 2 2 æ ö 1 1 < + + - + - 2 2 ç ÷ 0 ( x 1 ) y R è 2 ø 4

  37. The radial distance decision is whether is positive or negative And the vertical distance decision is whether is positive or negative; d1 and d2 are apart. The integer d1 is positive only if d2 + is positive (except special case where d2 = 0). Alternate Phrasing (3/3) 2 æ ö 1 1 = + + - + - 2 2 ç ÷ d 1 ( x 1 ) y R 2 4 è ø 2 æ ö 1 = + + - - 2 2 ç ÷ d 2 ( x 1 ) y R 2 è ø

  38. How to compute the value of at successive points? Answer: Note that is just and that is just Incremental Computation, Again 2 æ ö 1 = + + - - 2 2 ç ÷ f ( x , y ) ( x 1 ) y R 2 è ø + - f ( x 1 , y ) f ( x , y ) D = + ( x , y ) 2 x 3 E + - - f x y f x y ( 1 , 1 ) ( , ) D = + - + ( x , y ) 2 x 3 2 y 2 SE (1/2)

  39. If we move E, update by adding 2x + 3 If we move SE, update by adding 2x + 3 – 2y + 2. Forward differences of a 1st degree polynomial are constants and those of a 2nd degree polynomial are 1st degree polynomials this “first order forward difference,” like a partial derivative, is one degree lower Incremental Computation(2/2) F F’ F’’

  40. The function is linear, hence amenable to incremental computation, viz: Similarly D = + ( x , y ) 2 x 3 E D + - D = ( x 1 , y ) ( x , y ) 2 E E D + - - D = ( x 1 , y 1 ) ( x , y ) 2 E E D + - D = ( x 1 , y ) ( x , y ) 2 SE SE D + - - D = ( x 1 , y 1 ) ( x , y ) 4 SE SE Second Differences(1/2)

  41. For any step, can compute new ΔE(x, y) from old ΔE(x, y) by adding appropriate second constant increment – update delta terms as we move. This is also true of ΔSE(x, y) Having drawn pixel (a,b), decide location of new pixel at (a + 1, b) or (a + 1, b – 1), using previously computed d(a, b). Having drawn new pixel, must update d(a, b) for next iteration; need to find either d(a + 1, b) or d(a + 1, b – 1) depending on pixel choice Must add ΔE(a, b)or ΔSE(a, b) to d(a, b) So we… Look at d(i) to decide which to draw next, update x and y Update d using ΔE(a,b) or ΔSE(a,b) Update each of ΔE(a,b) and ΔSE(a,b) for future use Draw pixel Second Differences(2/2)

  42. Bresenham’s Eighth Circle Algorithm MEC (R) /* 1/8th of a circle w/ radius R */ { int x = 0, y = R; int delta_E, delta_SE; float decision; delta_E = 2*x + 3; delta_SE = 2(x-y) + 5; decision = (x+1)*(x+1) + (y - 0.5)*(y - 0.5) –R*R; Pixel(x, y); while( y > x ) { if (decision < 0) {/* Move east */ decision += delta_E; delta_E += 2; delta_SE += 2; /*Update delta*/ } else {/* Move SE */ y--; decision += delta_SE; delta_E += 2; delta_SE += 4; /*Update delta*/} x++; Pixel(x, y); } }

  43. Uses floats! 1 test, 3 or 4 additions per pixel Initialization can be improved Multiply everything by 4 No Floats! Makes the components even, but sign of decision variable remains same Questions Are we getting all pixels whose distance from the circle is less than ½? Why is y > x the right stopping criterion? What if it were an ellipse? Analysis

  44. Equation is i.e, Computation of and is similar Only 4-fold symmetry When do we stop stepping horizontally and switch to vertical? 2 2 x y + = 1 2 2 a b + = 2 2 2 2 2 2 b x a y a b D D SE E Aligned Ellipses

  45. When absolute value of slope of ellipse is more than 1, viz: How do you check this? At a point (x,y) for which f(x,y) = 0, a vector perpendicular to the level set is f(x,y) which is This vector points more right than up when Ñ é ù ¶ ¶ f f ( x , y ), ( x , y ) ê ú ¶ ¶ x y ë û ¶ ¶ f f - > ( x , y ) ( x , y ) 0 ¶ ¶ x y Direction Changing Criterion (1/2)

  46. In our case, and so we check for i.e. This, too, can be computed incrementally ¶ f = 2 ( x , y ) 2 a x ¶ x ¶ f = 2 ( x , y ) 2 b y ¶ y - > 2 2 2 a x 2 b y 0 - > 2 2 a x b y 0 Direction Changing Criterion (2/2)

  47. Patterned primitives Non-integer primitives General conics Other Scan Conversion Problems

  48. Patterned line from P to Q is not same as patterned line from Q to P. Patterns can be geometric or cosmetic Cosmetic: Texture applied after transformations Geometric: Pattern subject to transformations Cosmetic patterned line Geometric patterned line Patterned Lines Q P Q P

  49. Geometric Pattern vs. Cosmetic Pattern + Geometric (Perspectivized/Filtered) Cosmetic

More Related