1 / 31

Intersections of Identity, Teaching, and Learning: LGBT Issues and Student Success

Intersections of Identity, Teaching, and Learning: LGBT Issues and Student Success. Kristen A. Renn, PhD Michigan State University Presented at the POD Annual Meeting • November 6, 2010 • Saint Louis, Missouri. Connect LGBT issues and identities with contexts for teaching and learning

midori
Télécharger la présentation

Intersections of Identity, Teaching, and Learning: LGBT Issues and Student Success

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intersections of Identity, Teaching, and Learning: LGBT Issues and Student Success Kristen A. Renn, PhD Michigan State University Presented at the POD Annual Meeting • November 6, 2010 • Saint Louis, Missouri

  2. Connect LGBT issues and identities with contexts for teaching and learning • LGBT campus climate and culture • Strategies to transform climate, culture, teaching and learning related to LGBT issues and identities

  3. Definitions • Sexual Orientation – relationship between one’s gender and the gender(s) of those to whom one is attracted • Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Heterosexual • Gender Identity – relationship between felt or expressed gender and sex as assigned at birth • Cisgender, Transgender (e.g., FtM, MtF), GenderQueer

  4. Diversity and Identities • Sex, gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, ability, social class, religion, faith tradition • Part-time or Full-time • Direct from high school or “Nontraditional” • Military veterans • Urban, suburban, rural • In-State, Out of State, International

  5. Identities, Teaching, and Learning • Classroom interactions with faculty and peers • Readings, media, learning resources • Course assignments • Curriculum (majors, distribution requirements, integrated studies) • Co-curriculum: Service learning, study abroad, internships, co-op education, undergrad research, journal clubs

  6. Campus Climate • Current attitudes, behaviors and standards, and practices of employees and students of an institution (Rankin & Reason, 2008) • Four dimensions: • Historical legacy of inclusion or exclusion • Structural diversity • Psychological climate • Behavioral climate (Hurtado, Milem Clayton-Pederson, & Allen, 1998)

  7. LGBT Campus Climate • 2010 State of Higher Education for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People (www.campuspride.org) • 5149 surveys by students, faculty, staff, administrators • 50 states, all Carnegie types

  8. LGB Respondents: More Harassment and Discrimination • 61% were target of derogatory remarks • 47% felt deliberately ignored or excluded • 30% felt intimidated or bullied • 20% felt isolated or left out in groups • 13% feared for physical safety

  9. LGB Respondents: More Harassment and Discrimination • 11% feared a bad grade because of hostile classroom environment • 42% indicated that harassment happened in class • 52% experienced harassment in public or while walking on campus

  10. Transgender Respondents: More Harassment and Discrimination • 63% were target of derogatory remarks • 61% felt deliberately ignored or excluded • 40% felt intimidated or bullied • 32% felt isolated or left out in groups • 18% feared for physical safety

  11. Transgender Respondents: More Harassment and Discrimination • 15% feared a bad grade because of hostile classroom environment • 55% indicated that harassment happened in class • 65% experienced harassment in public or while walking on campus

  12. Students at the Highest Risk • Target of derogatory remarks: • LGB students = 68% • Faculty = 41% • Staff = 48% • Intimidated or bullied: • LGB students = 32% • Faculty = 31% • Staff = 22% • Students twice as likely as faculty to be a target of physical violence (staff reported 0 incidents)

  13. Campus Climate • Comfortable or Very Comfortable Overall: • Non-LGBT: 78% students, 85% faculty, 76% staff • LGBT: 70% students, 76% faculty, 64% staff • Comfortable/Very Comfortable Classroom: • Non-LGBT students: 76% • LGBT students: 64% • LGBT students, faculty, and staff more likely to consider leaving institution than non-LGBT

  14. Microaggressions • Subtle, everyday messages • Lowered expectations, tokenism, ignoring obvious discrimination, surveillance

  15. Go [Home Team]!Keep Austin Weird U T

  16. Michigan State beats University of Michigan third year in a row “Lit-tle Sis-ter, Lit-tle, Sis-ter!”

  17. A moment of silence to honor Rutgers student Tyler Clementi

  18. Approaches to LGBT Issues and Identities Active Discrimination Passive Discrimination Passive Support Active Support

  19. Active Discrimination • Outright actions and speech that create hostile and/or inequitable learning environment • Institutional, state, federal policies

  20. Passive Discrimination - Negligence • Microaggressions such as: • Ignoring student to student comments • Discouraging LGBT research • Lowering expectations • Omitting LGBT-related course content when it would be relevant • Assuming “unmarried” individuals are single • Habits and routines that reveal discriminatory attitudes

  21. Passive Support • Language (e.g., “partner” instead of “spouse”) • Classroom context: • Universal instructional design • Avoiding humor that singles out a group • Not asking someone to “represent” a group • “Props” of teaching • Faculty offices • Library displays • Bulletin boards

  22. Passive Support: Safe Zone • Training and education • Symbol to post

  23. Active Support – Leadership • Enact anti-discriminatory learning environment • Curricular infusion • Student assignments

  24. Active Support: Model Civil Discourse • Center oneself – the students are watching • Name the situation as local manifestation of societal context • Invite students to help resolve the conflict • Reframe from debate to dialogue • Take a break • Student writing • Address student emotions • Follow up

  25. Active Support: “Identity Neutral” Courses • Be creative • Look for LGBT issues in larger contexts to which course applies

  26. Active Support: Be an Ally • Search committees, curriculum review, promotion and tenure processes • Faculty development programming • Include LGBT issues with other diversity topics • Create LGBT-focused programs • Support for individual LGBT faculty

  27. Active Support: Institutional Transformation • Partner with LGBT resource center and/or student affairs • Work with LGBT faculty/staff groups to identify needs • Inject LGBT issues into diversity discussions, climate surveys, TA training, other programs

  28. But How Am I Going to Get Anyone to Listen? • Infusion • Leadership for Change • Strategic Partnerships • Most Compelling Arguments • Social justice, campus climate data, campus statistics, avoiding tragedy • Balance risk approach with strengths approach

  29. Connect LGBT issues and identities with contexts for teaching and learning • LGBT campus climate and culture • Strategies to transform climate, culture, teaching and learning related to LGBT issues and identities

  30. Thank you. Kristen Renn www.msu.edu/~renn renn@msu.edu

  31. References & Resources • Hurtado, S., Milem, J.F., Clayton-Pedersen, A.R., & Allen, W.R. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 279-302. • Rankin, S., & Reason, R. D. (20058). Transformational tapestry model: A comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1, 262-274. doi: 10.1037/a0014108 • Rankin, S., Weber, G., Blumenfeld, W., & Frazer, S. (2010). 2010 state of higher education for lesbian, gay, bisexual & transgender people. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride. (see www.campuspride.org for downloadable executive summary or to order full report) • Renn, K. A. (2010). LGBT and queer research in higher education: The state and status of the field. Educational Researcher, 39 (2), 132-141. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10362579 • Renn, K. A. (2000). Teaching lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students. College Teaching, 48 (4), 129-135. • National Consortium of LGBT Campus Resource Center Directors: www.lgbtcampus.org • Safe Zone development information http://architect.lgbtcampus.org/support_networks_and_safe_zones

More Related