1 / 45

Real-time motion planning for Manipulator based on Configuration Space

Real-time motion planning for Manipulator based on Configuration Space. Chen Keming Cis Peking University. Main Contents. Introduction My current work Future work and related work C-Space visualization for Teleoperation. Introduction. Manipulator Motion Planning Problems Statement:

mikaia
Télécharger la présentation

Real-time motion planning for Manipulator based on Configuration Space

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Real-time motion planning for Manipulator based on Configuration Space Chen Keming Cis Peking University

  2. Main Contents • Introduction • My current work • Future work and related work • C-Space visualization for Teleoperation

  3. Introduction • Manipulator Motion Planning Problems • Statement: • Compute a collision-free path for a manipulator among obstacles • Inputs: • Geometry of manipulator and obstacles • Kinematics of manipulator (degrees of freedom) • Initial and goal manipulator configurations (placements) • Outputs: • Continuous sequence of collision-free manipulator configurations connecting the initial and goal configurations

  4. Introduction • Tool: Configuration Space

  5. Introduction • Framework Manipulator representation Discretization Graph searching Configuration space formulation Obstacles representation

  6. My Current Work • Motivation: Towards real-time Human-Robot Interaction in dynamic environment • Application • (Mobile based) Manipulator interacts with human without collision • Dual-arm robot (Chen Fen,Ding Fu-qiangand Zhao Xi-fang “Collision-free Path Planning of dual-arm Robot.”ROBOT,vol.24,Mar.2002)

  7. My Current Work • Assumption • The input data are readily available at any time • Manipulator representation • Cylinders • Reduction to 3 joints • Obstacles representation • Cylinders • Combination of main body and arms

  8. My Current Work • C-Space formulation • Reduction to determine whether 2 cylinders collide in 3D W-Space Case 1: Case 2:

  9. My Current Work • Schematic

  10. My Current Work • Goal configurations formulation using inverse kinematics • Discretization • Joint 1: 161, Joint 2: 71, Joint 3: 121

  11. My Current Work • Lazy C-Space computation due to • Large numbers of points in C-Space(total 1,383,151 points) • Real-time process requirement • Graph searching (A*) • Why use A* • Optimal and complete • Objective values (expanding nodes, time)

  12. My Current Work • Speed up A* • OPEN is implemented as • hash table • priority list(implemented as Binary Heap) • CLOSED is implemented as hash table An example (collision checking points: more than 30000) List implementation Hash table and Binary Heap implementation

  13. My Current Work • Result:

  14. My Current Work • Dealing with dynamic environment • A* Replanner: Plan by A* using all the available information at the start. • Start tracing the optimal path • If there is a discrepancy between the initial map and the actual environment, update the new cost values for the corresponding arcs, run A* again for planning between the current position and the goal.

  15. My Current Work • A* Replanner: shortcoming • If the goal configuration is far away, little changes may force the planner to use A* over the whole C-Space, although the changes in the optimal path may be small • Hence, A* replanner can be grossly inefficient computationally for real-time process

  16. My Current Work • Optimization --- Dynamic A*(D*) [Stentz, 1994] • Functionally equivalent to A* replanner • Make “local” changes to the map and the resultant optimal path when a discrepancy between map and the environment is found • Essentially prunes the graph search • So, D* could be a proper choice for optimization. But so far, it has only been used in mobile robotics to move a robot to given goal coordinates in unknown terrain [Koenig, 2002].

  17. D* Algorithm c(x1,x2)=1 c(x1,x3)=1.4 c(x1,x8)=10000,if x8 is in obstacle,x1 is a freecell c(x1,x9)=10000.4, if x9 is in obstacle, x1 is a freecell

  18. Goal Gate Start

  19. Exam 1

  20. Exam 2

  21. My Current Work • Compared with A* replanner in our problem, D* performance superior over A* replanner Checking points per replanning

  22. Future work and related work • Modify program, make it more robust with more experiments, speed up with more modifications. • D* Limitation • D* search from goal configuration, what if there are several goal configurations (it’s common in manipulator motion planning)? • When the goal object is moving • Current on-line planning methods using A* based techniques focus on multi-directional search and parallel planning ([Dominik HENRICH, Christian WURLL and Heinz WÖRN, 1998], etc ) • D* should be adapted for our problems

  23. Future work and related work • Consult other D*-like replanning algorithms (e.g D* Lite [Koenig, 2002] ) • Survey other real-time motion planning techniques in high dimensional C-Space • Decomposition-based methods ([Kavraki, 2001], [Mediavilla, 2002], etc) • Probabilistic roadmap based methods(most deal with static environment)

  24. Future work and related work • Use a more general 3D model to represent manipulator and obstacles • Hierarchy structure • Tree structure

  25. Future work and related work • Taxonomy

  26. Future work and related work • Experiment using real robot arm: a challenging work Images from cameras Computer vision techniques Motion planning Model parameters

  27. C-Space Visualization for Teleoperation • Applications of C-Space Visualization • Provide important qualitative information for mechanical design (E.Sacks, C.Pisula and L.Joskowicz “Visualizing 3D Configuration Spaces for Mechanical Design.” ). • Evaluation of path planning methods • Teleoperation (I.Ivanisevic and J.Lumelsky “Configuration Space as a Means for Augmenting Human Performance in Teleoperation Tasks.”IEEE Trans.Syst.Man,Cyber.,vol.30,pp.471-484,Jun.2000).

  28. C-Space Visualization for Teleoperation • It’s easier for humans to handle motion planning problems in C-Space than in W-Space

  29. C-Space Visualization for Teleoperation • Challenges • When the computer which generates C-Space data is not the same as the computer which receives humans input, C-Space data must be transfered through network • C-Space data are too large • 161*71*121 for my current implementation • C-Space data change caused by dynamic environment, etc • Poor network bandwidth

  30. C-Space Visualization for Teleoperation • So, C-Space data compression is necessary • Additional work Framework: C-Space Data 3D Models Data 3D Model Data Compression C-Space for a Cylinder Object

More Related