1 / 30

Advanced Technology Solar Telescope ENCLOSURE

Overview

mills
Télécharger la présentation

Advanced Technology Solar Telescope ENCLOSURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Advanced Technology Solar Telescope ENCLOSURE

    2. Overview & Charge to Committee (Mark Warner) 6 Major Parts of SDR: SRD Flow Down & Error Budgets (Rob Hubbard) Specifications (LeEllen Phelps) Reference Designs (LeEllen) Lunch Performance & Analyses (LeEllen) Contracting Approach (Mark) Risk Areas (LeEllen) Plans for Future Work (LeEllen) AOB Executive Session (closed session for committee members) Feedback from Committee (All Hands) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dinner Explain Ill get back to the 5 parts in a moment We have a couple of short breaks scheduled throughout the day, plus a lunch at noonExplain Ill get back to the 5 parts in a moment We have a couple of short breaks scheduled throughout the day, plus a lunch at noon

    3. Function: Suppress seeing Outline here: What are we talking about? Thermal Performance I Gemini tests MuSES modeling Validation using Gemini data Hybrid Retractable Is this good enough? Seeing Performance Formulation: thermally disturbed layers Chart, in terms of average temperature of upstream skin BBSO tests to verify/sanity check Thermal Performance II Hardware modifications, hybrid Hardware modifications, retractable MuSES results w/mods Summarize Outline here: What are we talking about? Thermal Performance I Gemini tests MuSES modeling Validation using Gemini data Hybrid Retractable Is this good enough? Seeing Performance Formulation: thermally disturbed layers Chart, in terms of average temperature of upstream skin BBSO tests to verify/sanity check Thermal Performance II Hardware modifications, hybrid Hardware modifications, retractable MuSES results w/mods Summarize

    5. Overview: Requirements and Goals Configuration for analyses CFD Results Phases 2, 3 at Fluent Inc. (Phase 1 was an old design) Validation via CosmosFloWorks

    6. Requirements and Goals Minimum of 20 enclosure volumes per hour passive air flushing For wind speeds greater than 2 m/s from any azimuth direction No stagnant dead zones inside enclosure Ability to throttle down interior air flow as outside wind speed increases (max interior air velocity = 5 m/s) No direct sunlight to enter enclosure System should fully seal out weather during non-operational periods (e.g., overnight, rainy periods) Low-risk, high-reliability system COTS-type equipment Equipment easily serviced, replaced

    8. CFD Results: Fluent, Phase 2 Three wind directions : East, South, and South East One wind speed: 5 m/s (11.2 MPH) Shutter angle: 45-degrees elevation Results meet requirements and goals: ~36-240 enclosure volumes/hour (requirement: 20) Minimal flow up side of enclosure Minimal recirculation inside enclosure Mostly single-pass recirculation Good air flow through dome centerline (i.e., telescope location) 30-40% of outside wind speed from floor to ceiling

    9. Velocity Vectors

    10. CFD Results: Fluent, Phase 3 Additional Runs North flow cases (with rear vent/access door) Shutter angle effects (15 deg from horizon, zenith) E, S, N, SE flow cases Telescope obstruction effect One wind speed: 5 m/s (11.2 MPH) Results consistent with Phase 2 results: ~35-220 enclosure volumes/hour (requirement: 20) Flow mostly thru flow, with some single-pass recirculation TMA causes a minor flow disruption Primarily at base of TMA, below mirror Some slowing of flow downstream of TMA Minor reduction (~3-5%) of total throughput through enclosure Good flow/flushing across optical path of TMA

    12. Velocity Contours with TMA

    16. CFD Results: Validation

    17. Overview: MuSES for performance analyses for design development Other tools for Lower Enclosure for optimization Results M3 designs Value Engineering

    18. MuSES Modeling: Validation at Gemini North

    22. Dark, volcanic, rocky backgroundDark, volcanic, rocky background

    23. Dark, volcanic, rocky backgroundDark, volcanic, rocky background

More Related