1 / 57

Citizens Behind the Science: The Use of Citizen Volunteers in Urban Bird Research

Citizens Behind the Science: The Use of Citizen Volunteers in Urban Bird Research. William P. Mueller WI Society for Ornithology WI Bird Conservation Initiative Timothy L. Vargo Urban Ecology Center Owen D. Boyle WDNR. An urban bird study - - -.

mina
Télécharger la présentation

Citizens Behind the Science: The Use of Citizen Volunteers in Urban Bird Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Citizens Behind the Science: The Use of Citizen Volunteers in Urban Bird Research William P. Mueller WI Society for Ornithology WI Bird Conservation Initiative Timothy L. Vargo Urban Ecology Center Owen D. Boyle WDNR

  2. An urban bird study - - - • Some of the most effective studies of bird species and changes, such as population declines, begin with a discussion of birds in the landscape…

  3. Changes in the landscape: fragmentation (Curtis 1956)

  4. Patches of habitat in urban areas are surrounded by areas much less suitable for bird use

  5. Milwaukee County’s parks comprise a fragmented set of habitats for migrating land birds…

  6. …BUT,these fragmented woodlands can be vital refuges for migrants!

  7. Milwaukee County Avian Migration Monitoring Partnership (MCAMMP) Project Goals: • Assess bird use of small habitat patches in an urban matrix • Sampling & analysis of differences in vegetation that help to explain #1 • Determine refueling rate of migrants in variable patch types, and thereby measure habitat quality • Train and utilize citizen scientists to accomplish these research goals and establish a long-term Citizen-based monitoring program

  8. Importance of this research • Migrants utilize a variety of stopover sites • One often-neglected set of sites are in urban areas • Urban habitats include parks and natural areas, often characterized by some degree of disturbance • This is one of the first studies nationwide to focus on how refueling rate and body condition are affected by quality of urban stopover habitats

  9. Components of the MCAMMP Project • GPS mapping of sites • Transect counts of species on each site • Study design/ site selection • Vegetation sampling protocol • Mistnetting and banding of migrants and blood sampling of target species • Environmental education: students and citizen scientists

  10. All study sites and transects were GPS’d, and mapped on aerial photos

  11. MCAMMP Transects • 250 m in length X 40 m in width • Data on all species found, weather, time of day and duration of transect, degree of leaf development in canopy • 8 study sites in 2006-2007; 4 additional sites in 2008

  12. In the first 2 field seasons, ~90 species were found on transect counts, including:

  13. Volunteers and the Transects • The Plan: • Volunteers seek certification by the Wisconsin Birder Certification Program (Bob Howe, UW-Green Bay) • The Reality…

  14. MCAMMP Vegetation Sampling

  15. Vegetation Sampling: Questions • What are the differences in the vegetation between sites that could explain differential bird use? • Plant species composition • Vegetation structure • How is habitat quality affected by the presence of invasive exotic plant species?

  16. Vegetation Data Collection • What are the differences in the vegetation of sites that could explaindifferential bird use/ refueling rates? • identify species • relative abundance/ % cover • canopy closure • bare ground/ leaf litter

  17. Vegetation Data Collection • How is habitat quality affected by the presence of invasive exotic plant species? • abundance of dominant exotics • correlation with site use (transect/ banding data) or bird condition (blood analysis)?

  18. Challenges of sampling vegetation with citizen scientists • No trails! (buckthorn/ honeysuckle thickets, steep-sided ravines) • Longer hours/ field season • Random sampling

  19. Benefits of sampling vegetation with citizen scientists • Data collection assistance • data recording • plant I.D. • estimating percent cover/ canopy closure • tree measurements • Doubled the number of teams (data collected) per day

  20. MCAMMP Mistnetting and Banding

  21. MCAMMP banding program • Pilot Year: Two Stations - Riverside & Kletzsch Parks • Two teams banding on same day for comparison • Blood sampling of 7 target species: • Seed-eaters: SCJU & WTSP • Frugivores: SWTH & HETH • Insectivores: AMRE, YRWA, MYWA

  22. In the first two field seasons, 44 species were banded, with blood samples taken from all 8 target species.

  23. ASSESSING RATES OF FUEL DEPOSITION AND STOPOVER HABITAT QUALITY FOR MIGRATORY BIRDS Christopher G. Guglielmo University of Western Ontario

  24. Circulating lipid metabolites reflect the metabolic state of migrants METABOLITE FEEDING FASTING TRIGLYCERIDE B- OH- BUTYRATE

  25. Metabolite profiles change rapidly after a change in feeding rate in Wilson’s Warblers (Wilsonia pusilla). ** * Zajac et al. 2006 JAB 37:405-408

  26. MCAMMP: blood sampling

  27. A very small blood sample, taken from the brachial vein (sample size varies in relation to size of bird)

  28. Blood Sampling: Questions • How do migrants fare on small habitat patches in an urban matrix? • How effectively can they re-fuel?

  29. The Volunteer Training Process: Creating an MCAMMP Citizen Scientist • Volunteer workshop • Recruiting: introduction to the project partners, goals, and volunteer opportunities • Detailed training in the field • On-the-ground experience • Opportunities for team building • picnics and parties!

  30. MCAMMP Volunteer and Intern Effort (2006-2007)

  31. Vargo et al. (in press)

  32. The most extraordinary thing about the MCAMMP project is simply its people.

  33. Volunteers and visitors are not always students…

More Related