1 / 12

Classification, Monitoring, and Assessing the Environment in Scotland RBMP

This article discusses the process of classifying, monitoring, and assessing the water environment in Scotland's River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs). It highlights the need for classification, the objectives and state of water environment, how classification was devised, and the monitoring methods used. The article also explains the grouping of water bodies and the inclusion of heavily modified water bodies in the classification system.

mirianl
Télécharger la présentation

Classification, Monitoring, and Assessing the Environment in Scotland RBMP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Classification Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment

  2. RBMP Why we need to classify • Provides information on the environment’s quality to the Scottish public • Classification allows us to define targeted objectives for the RBMPs • We have to report results to the EU

  3. Ecostat How was classification devised? Increasingcontrol Increasingcomparability

  4. HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD Objectives and state of the water environment in Scotland • No deterioration • Improve to Good Status by 2027 • Protected Areas R e s t o r e

  5. What is classification? • All Scotland’s baseline water bodies have to be classified • Classification based on ecological, chemical and hydromorphological data • WBs will be classified as High, Good, Moderate, Poor or Bad status (GEP) • Large emphasis on ecology • Classification informs the setting of objectives

  6. What do we do where?

  7. How do we monitor and classify? • Risk-based, in response to pressures • Good spatial extent 3 types of monitoring • Surveillance – long term change • Operational – sites at risk • Investigative – pollution incidents or intensive to improve confidence • REVIEWED ANNUALLY

  8. Grouping • Grouping – why? • Have to classify all water bodies; can’t afford to monitor them all • How were the groups created? • Based on risk, pressure profile and typology. Each group has monitoring in and these classification results used to classify the group

  9. Heavily modified water body • “so affected by human activity . . . that it may be unfeasible or unreasonably expensive to achieve good status . . . less stringent environmental objectives may be set” • So, we assess HMWBs for “ecological potential”, not ecological status

  10. What’s in classification? • Then for each final box, varying numbers of parameters below • Type of parameter varies, depending on the water category

  11. One out all out • Overall status is same as the worst parameter • No averaging out • Consistent across EU and UK

  12. Pass Pass Pass Pass High High High High High High High High High Good Bad High High High High High High e.g. rivers Bad Pass Bad Bad

More Related