1 / 15

The Completely Randomized Model: One-Factor Analysis of Variance

Chapter Topics. The Completely Randomized Model: One-Factor Analysis of Variance F -Test for Difference in c Means The Tukey-Kramer Procedure ANOVA Assumptions Kruksal-Wallis Rank Test for Differences in c Medians. One-Factor Analysis of Variance.

moniquea
Télécharger la présentation

The Completely Randomized Model: One-Factor Analysis of Variance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter Topics • The Completely Randomized Model: One-Factor Analysis of Variance • F-Test for Difference in c Means • The Tukey-Kramer Procedure • ANOVA Assumptions • Kruksal-Wallis Rank Test for Differences in c • Medians

  2. One-Factor Analysis of Variance • Evaluate the Difference Among the Means of 2 or More (c) Populations • e.g., Several Types of Tires, Oven Temperature Settings • Assumptions: • Samples are Randomly and Independently Drawn (This condition must be met.) • Populations are Normally Distributed (F test is Robust to moderate departures from normality.) • Populations have Equal Variances

  3. One-Factor ANOVATest Hypothesis H0: m1 = m2 = m3 = ... = mc • All population means are equal • No treatment effect (NO variation in means among groups) H1: not all the mkare equal • At least ONE population mean is different • (Others may be the same!) • There is treatment effect • Does NOT mean that all the means are different: m1¹m2¹ ... ¹mc

  4. One-Factor ANOVA:No Treatment Effect H0: m1 = m2 = m3 = ... = mc H1: not all the mkare equal The Null Hypothesis is True m1 = m2= m3

  5. Commonly referred to as: Sum of Squares Within, or Sum of Squares Error, or Within Groups Variation Commonly referred to as: Sum of Squares Among, or Sum of Squares Between, or Sum of Squares Model, or Among Groups Variation One-Factor ANOVAPartitions of Total Variation Total Variation SST Variation Due to Treatment SSA Variation Due to Random Sampling SSW = +

  6. Among-Group Variation nj =the number of observations in group j c =the number of groups _ Xj the sample mean of group j _ _ X the overall or grand mean mimj Variation Due to Differences Among Groups.

  7. Within-Group Variation the ith observation in group j the sample mean of group j Summing the variation within each group and then adding over all groups. mj

  8. One-Way ANOVA Summary Table Degrees Sum of Source of Mean F Test Statistic Squares Variation of Square Freedom (Variance) MSA = Among SSA MSA = c - 1 MSW (Factor) SSA/(c - 1) Within SSW n - c MSW = (Error) SSW/(n - c) Total n - 1 SST = SSA+SSW

  9. One-Factor ANOVA F Test Example Machine1Machine2Machine3 25.40 23.40 20.00 26.31 21.80 22.20 24.10 23.50 19.75 23.74 22.75 20.60 25.10 21.60 20.40 • As production manager, you want to see if 3 filling machines have different mean filling times. You assign 15 similarly trained & experienced workers, 5 per machine, to the machines. At the .05 level, is there a difference in mean filling times?

  10. Summary Table Source of Degrees of Sum of Mean Variation Freedom Squares Square (Variance) MSA MSW Among 3 - 1 = 2 47.1640 23.5820 F = = 25.60 (Machines) Within 15 - 3 = 12 11.0532 .9211 (Error) Total 15 - 1 = 14 58.2172

  11. One-Factor ANOVA ExampleSolution Test Statistic: Decision: Conclusion: • H0: m1 = m2 = m3 • H1: Not All Equal • a = .05 • df1= 2 df2 = 12 • Critical Value(s): MSA 23 5820 . = F = = 25 . 6 MSW . 9211 Reject at a = 0.05 a = 0.05 There is evidence that at least one m i differs from the rest. F 0 3.89

  12. The Tukey-Kramer Procedure • Tells Which Population Means • Are Significantly Different • e.g., m1 = m2¹m3 • Post Hoc (a posteriori) • Procedure • Done after rejection of equal means in ANOVA • Ability for Pairwise Comparisons: • Compare absolute mean differences with ‘critical range’ f(X) m m m X = 1 2 3 2 groups whose means may be significantly different.

  13. The Tukey-Kramer Procedure: Example Machine1Machine2Machine325.40 23.40 20.00 26.31 21.80 22.20 24.10 23.50 19.75 23.74 22.75 20.60 25.10 21.60 20.40 • 1. Compute absolute mean differences: 2. Compute Critical Range: 3. Each of the absolute mean difference is greater. There is a significance difference between each pair of means. = 1.618

  14. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test for c Medians • Extension of Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test Tests the equality of more than 2 (c) population medians • Distribution-free test procedure • Used to analyze completely randomized experimental designs

  15. Kruskal-Wallis Rank Test • Assumptions: • Independent random samples are drawn • Continuous dependent variable • Data may be ranked both within and among samples • Populations have same variability • Populations have same shape • Robust with regard to last 2 conditions • Use F Test in completely randomized designs and when the more stringent assumptions hold.

More Related