1 / 32

Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day

Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002. Themes of the presentation. Increase in schema creation activity Tension between differentiation and interoperability

morriscarol
Télécharger la présentation

Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Application Profiles: interoperable friend or foe? Rachel Heery Michael Day TEL Milestone Conference Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  2. Themes of the presentation • Increase in schema creation activity • Tension between differentiation and interoperability • Counterbalances to proliferation of portals • sharing schema • regard for end-user requirements • controlled evolution of vocabularies • cross standard interoperability • Rôle of information professionals ... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  3. Definitions... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  4. Definition of Element Set • An element set is coherent bounded set of terms formulated as a basis for metadata creation • Designed for particular purpose e.g. domain-specific, resource description, rights • Identifies designated authority TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  5. Definition of Schema • An schema is a structured representation that defines and identifies terms in an element set • Provides authoritatve declaration of terms • Indicates semantic relationship of terms • Supports unique identification of terms • Typically schema will be expressed on RDF or XML schema language TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  6. Definition of Application Profile • An application profile is a schema which consists of terms (metadata elements) drawn from one or more element sets optimised for a particular local application • Application profiles are declarations of usage • Application profile reuse terms already defined elsewhere; or use terms from a local element set TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  7. Schema Declares set of terms with identifiers, definitions and comments Self reliant Means of declaring ‘new terms’ Application profile schema Declares set of terms used in particular application or domain Optimised for that application or domain Re-uses terms from elsewhere Means of declaring terms that an application uses and understands TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  8. Increase in schema creation activity TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  9. Optimisation and adaptation • MARC local fields • 9XX and XX9 tags • Z39.50 application profiles • sub-sets of standard appropriate for application area • IMS • UK Further Education extension • Dublin Core domain specific elements and qualifiers TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  10. New application profiles • RSLP Collection Level description • DC Government • DC Libraries • DC Education • Australian Government Locator Service • Food and Agricultural Organisation • European Environment Agency • Renardus • EASEL, • Schoolnet • Various UK educational initiatives • etc., etc. TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  11. Sharing schemas ... • Standard solutions are published but • Implementers’ adaptations/extensions are not made widely available • Has this led to unnecessary proliferation of schemas, to duplication and repetition? TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  12. Characterising requirements • Implementers need to declare various characteristics of their schema: • terms used • whether a term is mandatory • any refined definitions of terms from existing namespaces • which schemes must be used for content • other rules for content TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  13. How to share ... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  14. Best practice for sharing schema "What terms does your metadata use?" Need to express in “comparable“ way: Which standard terms are used in an application How terms are adapted or used locally Other related usage notes

  15. Registries of schemas • To give access to schemas • searching and browsing • names, definitions, usage • relationships between terms • Support evolution of schemas • top-down (standards authorities) • bottom-up (real world usage) • Disclosure, discovery, effective reuse, harmonisation TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  16. Publishing schemas and application profiles • Why? • To inform and promote • To provide authoritative version • To facilitate inter-working • To support • Evolution • Alignment TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  17. MetaForm at the State and University Library in Göttingen MEG registry serving UK Metadata for Education group SCHEMAS registry EC funded, serving European projects (soon to be CORES!) DCMI registry prototypes: access to information on DCMI terms Registries TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  18. Balancing standardisation and differentiation ... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  19. Increase in schema creation activity • Implementers must decide on appropriate metadata for a new service or system ... but what?Is there a single answer? • Re-use • Interoperability • Users want coherent services • But all want new, innovative services • Tension between alignment and differentiation TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  20. Difficult issues! • People are keen to reach consensus, but…. • Inconsistent approach in practice • When should implementers create new terms? • When should implementers try to add terms to existing element sets? • Varying practice about creation of local element sets • Messy issue of data models TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  21. Is a new DCMI term required? • [Based on Stuart Sutton’s Action Chart!] • When faced with requirement for schema: • Use existing single schema where possible • else • Will use of domain specific scheme meet requirement? • else • Will term from another schema meet requirement? • else • Will a new domain-specific qualifier meet practice? • else • Create local term?/Recommend schema extension? • Then declare terms ... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  22. Meeting user requirements.. TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  23. Quality control • How well does metadata meet needs of user? • Needs to be awareness of quality and information retrieval issues in schema design • Some suggested criteria: • effectiveness of retrieval • effectiveness of display of retrieved record • cost of metadata creation • barriers to interoperability TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  24. Evolution of element sets TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  25. Managing evolution of element sets • Ordered procedure for new terms • approval process • historical record of changes • Top-down (committee structure) or bottom-up (feedback from usage statistics • Possibilities for automation? • Registration of new terms • harvesting existing metadata TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  26. Cross standard interoperability TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  27. Collaboration between standardisation bodies • acknowledging overlapping semantics • honouring namespaces i.e. re-use elements from existing element sets • reach consensus on ‘core elements’ • reach consensus on data models for declaring schema • collaborate on registries • This is the agenda of CORES project! TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  28. Information on standards • Practitioners need accessible information • Overviews of standards development • Reviews of schema-creating activities • Need information on inter-relation of standards in relation to schema e.g. Z39.50 attribute sets and DC schema • Need commentary and guidance information TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  29. The rôle of the information professional? • Tradition of collaboration within library world • Ability to articulate needs of end-user communities • Expertise in information retrieval techniques • Ability to create user-friendly, accessible documentation • Healthy scepticism of technology? TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  30. Can contribute to • Lobbying for infrastructure for sharing schema, moving from projects to services • Lobbying for tools • Helping build tools • Involvement in standardisation process • Putting in quality control • Considering costs, developing business models ... TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  31. Further reading • Rachel Heery & Manjula Patel, “Application Profiles: mixing and matching metadata schemas,” Ariadne, 25, September 2000:http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue25/app-profiles/ • Thomas Baker, Makx Dekkers, Rachel Heery, Manjula Patel & Gauri Salokhe, “What terms does your metadata use? Application Profiles as machine-understandable narratives,” Journal of Digital Information, 2 (2), November 2001: http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v02/i02/Baker/ • Heike Neuroth & Traugott Koch, “Metadata mapping and application profiles: approaches to providing the cross-searching of heterogeneous resources in the EU project Renardus,” Proceedings of DC-2001: http://www.nii.ac.jp/dc2001/proceedings/ • SCHEMAS Registry: http://www.schemas-forum.org/registry/ • DCMI Registry: http://wip.dublincore.org:8080/registry/Registry • CORES: http://www.cores-eu.net TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

  32. Acknowledgements • UKOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the UK higher and further education funding councils, as well as by project funding from the JISC and the European Union. UKOLN also receives support from the University of Bath, where it is based. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ TEL Milestone Conference, Frankfurt am Main, 29-30 April 2002

More Related