1 / 32

Mikhail Gelfand RECOMB-BE. UCSD, La Jolla, 15-III- 200 9

From computer to the wet lab and back Comparative genomics in the discovery of a family of bacterial transporters with a new mode of action. Mikhail Gelfand RECOMB-BE. UCSD, La Jolla, 15-III- 200 9. Transporters. Two main classes ATP-dependent TM-protein (permease) ATPase

munin
Télécharger la présentation

Mikhail Gelfand RECOMB-BE. UCSD, La Jolla, 15-III- 200 9

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From computer to the wet lab and backComparative genomics in the discovery of a family of bacterial transporters with a new mode of action Mikhail Gelfand RECOMB-BE. UCSD, La Jolla, 15-III-2009

  2. Transporters • Two main classes • ATP-dependent • TM-protein (permease) • ATPase • Substrate-binding protein • Secondary (symporters, antiporters) • Difficult to study in experiment (compared to enzymes) • Relatively easy to identify • Similarity to known transporters • Prediction of transmembrane segments • Difficult to predict specificity H+

  3. It is difficult to predict specificity by sequence analysis (nickel-oligopeptide family,substrate-binding NikA)

  4. PnuC family of cofactor transporters

  5. Riboflavin biosynthesis pathway

  6. 5’ UTR regionsof riboflavin genes

  7. RFN-element Capitals: invariant (absolutely conserved) positions. Lower case letters: strongly conserved positions. Dashes and stars: obligatory and facultative base pairs Degenerate positions: R = A or G; Y = C or U; K = G or U; B= not A; V = not U. N: any nucleotide. X: any nucleotide or deletion

  8. RFN: the mechanism of regulation • Transcription attenuation • Translation attenuation

  9. YpaA: riboflavin transporter • 5 predicted TM segments => a transporter • Upstream RFN element => co-regulation with riboflavin genes => transport of riboflavin / precursor • S. pyogenes, E. faecalis, Listeria spp.: ypaA, no riboflavin pathway => transport of riboflavin Prediction:YpaA is riboflavin transporter(Gelfand et al., 1999) Verification: • by genetic analysis (Kreneva et al., 2000) • directly (Burgess et al., 2006) => RibU • ypaA is regulated by riboflavin(Lee et al., 2001) • … via attenuation of transcription(Winkler et al., 2003)

  10. Biotin transporter BioY • Identification: • co-localization • co-regulation • phylogenetic profiling • Additional components • ATPase(?) bioM • Permease(?) bioN

  11. = thiN (confirmed) Transport of HET Transport of HMP (Gram-positive bacteria) (Gram-negative bacteria) Thiamin biosynthesis

  12. yuaJ(=thiT): thiamine transporter • 6 predicted TM-segments • Regulated by THI riboswitches • Streptococci: ThiT, no thiamine pathway

  13. ykoFEDC: ATP-dependent HMP transporter • Regulated by THI riboswitches • Newer occurs in genomes lacking thiamine pathway • Always co-occurs with thiD and thiE • Sometimes occurs without thiC

  14. Cobalt andNickel • Co-localization • Ni transporterswith genes for Ni-dependent enzymes • Co transporters with cobalamine biosynthesis genes • Co-regulation • Ni transportersby transcription factorNikR • Co transportersby В12 riboswitich

  15. Structure of the loci genes B12 riboswitch NikR binding site

  16. Five families of transporters

  17. New ATP-dependent transporters + CbiN CbiM Ni2+ Co2+ NikM + NikN + NikL, NikK + NikL

  18. Dmitry Rodionov  Thomas Eitinger

  19. Test 1: predicted specificity is correct Co Co Ni Ni Ni Co

  20. Structure: too many components

  21. Biotin transporter BioY • ATPase BioM ~ CbiO = NikO • Permease BioN ~ CbioQ = NikQ

  22. Test 2: MN components aresuffucient(ATPase and permease are dispensable) cbiMNQO cbiMNQ cbiMN cbiM control

  23. Test 3: BioY is sufficientEven if the genome had BioMNY;BioMNY has better cinetics

  24. Tip of the iceberg?

  25. Validations FolT: folate (like BioY) RibU: riboflavin ThiT: thiamin

  26. Universal energizing component + specific components

  27. Transporters • Identification of candidates by analysis of transmembrane segments and similarity • Assignment to pathway by co-localization and co-regulation (in many genomes) • Prediction of specificity by analysis of phylogenetic patterns: • End product if present in genomes lacking this pathway (substituting the biosynthetic pathway for an essential compound) • Input metabolite if absent in genomes without the pathway (catabolic, also precursors in biosynthetic pathways) • Entry point in the middle if substituting an upper or side part of the pathway in some genomes

  28. Dmitry Rodionov • Alexei Vitreschak (RNA regulation) • Andrei Mironov (software, discussion) • Thomas Eitinger’s lab • Anrei Osterman’s lab • European Science Foundation • HHMI, RFBR, RAS, INTAS

More Related