1 / 45

Neutrino Physics

Neutrino Physics. Part 1: Neutrino oscillation in vacuum Introduction: neutrino mass, mixing and oscillation Atmospheric neutrinos and accelerator neutrinos. Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg. n. Some Historical Remarks. 1930: neutrino postulated by Pauli (massless, neutral)

Télécharger la présentation

Neutrino Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrino Physics • Part 1: Neutrino oscillation in vacuum • Introduction: neutrino mass, mixing and oscillation • Atmospheric neutrinos and accelerator neutrinos Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg

  2. n Some Historical Remarks • 1930: neutrino postulated by Pauli (massless, neutral) • 1956: neutrino ve detected by Reines and Cowan • 1957: Wu discovered parity violation in weak interaction • 1958: Goldhaber experiment neutrinos are left handed anti-neutrinos right handed

  3. 3 Neutrino Flavors • 1960: B. Pontecorvo and M. Schwartz proposed neutrino beam (from accelerated protons)→ discovery of vμ at AGS in Brookhaven by Ledermann, Schwartz and Steinberger • LEP measurement of Z0 decay width:→ 3 active neutrino flavors (mv < 80 GeV): Nv = 3.00±0.06 ve, vμ, vτ • 2000: vτdetected by DONUT experiment

  4. Neutrinos in the Standard Model ? • No right handed neutrinos • Neutrinos are massless • Le, Lμ, Lτconserved

  5. Neutrino Oscillations were observed→ Neutrinos have mass! JAPAN JAPAN CANADA SNO KamLAND Super-Kamiokande vμ→v,(s) OscillationΔm2 ≈ 2·10-3 eV2 ve→vμ,τ OscillationΔm2 ≈ 8·10-5 eV2 atmospheric neutrinosaccelerator neutrinos reactor neutrinos solar neutrinos Important experimental results in recent years

  6. Neutrino Oscillations are a consequence of neutrino mass and mixing What is neutrino mixing?→ compare to quark CKM mixing

  7. mass eigenstates mass eigenstates Quark and Lepton Mixing:Eigenstates of weak interaction ≠ Eigenstates of mass Neutrino - Mixing Quark - Mixing

  8. Cabbibo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) Matrix • 3 mixing angles • 1 phase: ei CP-violation BELLE, BABAR,CLEO,… Quark-Mixing in precision measurement phase

  9. of masses: md « ms « mb of mixing angles: s12 = λ, s23≈λ2, s13≈λ3 Hierarchy in Quark Mixing

  10. Neutrino mixing! Neutrino mass and mixing 3 massive neutrinos: ν1, ν2, ν3 with masses: m1,m2,m3 Flavor-Eigenstates ve,vμ,vτ ≠ Mass-Eigenstates

  11. Historical remark • 1957-58: B. Pontecorvo proposed neutrino oscillations(because only ve was known, he thought of v ↔ anti-v) • 1962 Maki, Nakagawa, Sakatadescribed the 2 flavor mixing and discussed neutrino flavor transition • 1967 full discussion of 2 flavor mixing,possibility of solar neutrino oscillations,question of sterile neutrinos by B. Pontecorvo

  12. Parametrization of Neutrino Mixing • Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) Matrix: • 3 Mixing angles: θ12, θ23, θ13 • 1 Dirac-Phase (CP violating): δ θsol θ13, δ θatm • If neutrinos are Majorana particles: • 2 additional Majorana-Phases (CPV): α1, α2

  13. v3 vτ vτ vτ vμ vτ θ23 vμ vμ vμ v2 ve ve θ12 θ12 θ12 v1 θ12: 29o - 39o ve θ13 θ13 ve Solar and reactor experiments Θ23: 34o - 58o θ13<13o, δ ? Atmospheric and accelerator Unknown (CHOOZ) Neutrino mixing angles

  14. propagation determined bymass-eigenstates source createsflavor-eigenstates detector seesflavor-eigenstates v2 τ vτ v3 vμ W W μ p,n hadrons slightly different frequencies→ phase difference changes Neutrino Oscillations Mass eigenstates v2,v3with m2, m3 Flavor eigenstates vμ, vτ

  15. k = 1, 2, 3 α = e, μ, τ neutrinos with negative helicity, mass mk, momentum pand energy is the amplitude for the transition vα→ vβ at time t General derivation of oscillation formula: now change to flavor base →

  16. and using General derivation of oscillation formula:

  17. Oscillation probability Probability to find vμ Probability to find vτ disappearance Survival probability Losz, Δm2 sin2(2θ) appearance Distance x in Losz 2 Flavor Neutrino Oscillations

  18. Primary cosmic ray π π N N π K ν μ atmospheric neutrinos #(vμ) / #(ve) ≈ 2

  19. Atmospheric Neutrino History • In less than two decades, atmospheric neutrinos have gone from being “anomalous” to being one of our main tools for theexploration of the lepton sector. • 1980s – 1990s: Skepticism was rampant! • “Neutrino experiments are hard!” • “Cosmic ray experiments are hard!” • “Oscillation experiments are hard!”

  20. L ≈ 20 km atmosphericneutrinos:Ev in GeV range L ≈ 13000 km Oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos Oscillation probabilityvaries with zenith angle θ θ

  21. Super-Kamiokande • solar neutrinos (8B ve few MeV) • atmospheric neutrinos (vμ,ve few GeV) • K2K accelerator neutrinos (vμ 1 GeV) • start ~2009: T2K off-axis super neutrino beam

  22. electron event myon event Super-Kamiokande 50kt H2O 12000 PMTs

  23. without oscillation oscillation (best fit) data SuperK – atmospheric neutrinos e–like events μ–like events νμ νe μ e

  24. Atmospheric neutrinos:Analysis neutrino oscillation (full SK-I data set) E.Kearns Neutrino2004 Confirmed by MACRO, SOUDAN

  25. Analysis of eventswith high L/E resolution

  26. Oscillation dip!(?) First evidence of oscillation pattern? • oscillation • decay • decoherence “EVIDENCE FOR AN OSCILLATORY SIGNATURE IN ATMOSPHERIC NEUTRINO OSCILLATION.”Super-Kamiokande Apr 2004., Submitted to Phys.Rev.Lett., hep-ex/0404034

  27. from L/E analysis

  28. Super-Kamiokande: Accident 2001 Accident Nov 21, 2001:~7000 of 12000 PMT’simploded in chain reaction

  29. Decay Pipe Focusing Devices m Proton Beam Target nm p,K Beam Dump • Beam composition (typical example): • dominantly vμ • contamination from vμ(≈6%), ve (≈0.7%), ve (≈0.2%) • vτ≲ 10-6 Neutrino beams few GeV few 100 GeV

  30. K2K 250km

  31. Super-Kamiokande I Inner detector 41.4m 1114620” PMTs Outer detector 18858” PMTs 39m Super-Kamiokande II • Removed Lead Glass detector • Installed SciBar and Electron • Catcher (Oct.2003~) The K2K experiment K2K-I Mar.1999 ~ Jul.2001 near neutrino detectors Muon range detector K2K-II Dec.2002~ Upgrade of near neutrino detectors

  32. K2K accelerator experiment Super-Kfar detector50 kton Near Detector1 ton νμ, <Eν>=1.3 GeV KEK 300m 250km Goal: 1.0×1020 POT = 200 neutrino events in SK Data (06/1999 – 02/2004): 8.9·1019 POT events in “Far Detector” :expected without oscillation: Probability for no oscillation: <0.01%Neutrino oscillation confirmed with 3.9σ!

  33. First hint for typical deformation of energy spectrum without oscillationbest fit oscillation

More Related