1 / 54

Internet Research in Russia Alexander VOISKOUNSKY

Internet Research in Russia Alexander VOISKOUNSKY. December 21 st , 2005 Haifa University, Israel. Alexander Voiskounsky’s Regular Address:. Dept. of Psychology, Moscow State University after M.V. Lomonosov 8/5 Mokhovaya st., Moscow 103009 Russia Tel.: +7 095 203 3409 (dept.)

nanda
Télécharger la présentation

Internet Research in Russia Alexander VOISKOUNSKY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Internet Research in RussiaAlexander VOISKOUNSKY December 21st, 2005 Haifa University, Israel

  2. Alexander Voiskounsky’s Regular Address: Dept. of Psychology, Moscow State University after M.V. Lomonosov 8/5 Mokhovaya st., Moscow 103009 Russia Tel.: +7 095 203 3409 (dept.) E-mail: vae-msu@mail.ru For long files: vaemsu@gmail.com

  3. Personal Experience in CMC studies • Study, patterns in LAN communication (1980-1983); • F2F interviews with Soviet participants (N=11) of the UN teleconference in biochemistry (December 1983); • Content analysis of listings of several international newsgroups with one Soviet participant (1983-1985); • Use of computer networks for bibliographic search in PsycInfo & other databases (since mid-1980s); • Listening to a lecture course, S.R.Hiltz & M.Turoff (authors of: The Network Nation, 1978); early 1980s; • Personal e-mail account, end of 1991, access to e-mail & news-conferences.

  4. Internet development in Russia • 1980s – National Center of Automatic Exchange of Information (Acad. of Sciences): limited access of selected representatives of several organizations (including the MSU), assisting operators. • Late 1980’ – enthusiastic Unix programmers worked on computer telecommunications. • August 1990 – connection to fuug.fi (Helsinki). • 19 Sept. 1990 – registration of the domain .su • 7 April 1994 – registration of the domain .ru

  5. PREHISTORY OF THE INTERNET RESEARCH IN RUSSIADuring the 1980s, years before the regular access to the global telecommunications became available, two research projects had been advanced in Russia (then the USSR); the first started shortly before 1985, i.e. before the Soviet perestroika, and the 2nd in 1985:1. Speech Patterns‘ Analysis in Computer-Mediated Communication (1984-1990)2. VELHAM (Velikhov-Hamburg) joint Soviet/Russian – American project on „COGNITION AND COMMUNICATION“ (1985-1994).

  6. Prehistory (continued) 1. „Speech Patterns Analysis“   Research was based on the analysis of LAN users‘ behavior patterns and on the analysis done while episodic access to listings of newsgroups‘ communication patterns. The main results are the description of the peculiarity of awareness and orientation practices while computer mediated communication (direct and indirect ways of orientation in the variety of communicative partners), and the specifics of speech patterns, with features common for written and spoken speech, for dialogues, monologues, and polilogues.

  7. Prehistory (continued)REFERENCES -Voiskounsky A. (1995). The development of external means of communicative orientation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 33 (5), 74-81. - Voiskounsky A. (1998). Telelogue Speech. F.Sudweeks et al. (Eds.). Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, pp. 27-40. - Voiskounsky A. (1992). Speech in computer mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, Proc., East-West Internat. Conf. - St. Petersburg, pp. 240-243. - Voiskounsky A. Internet Communication: Social Language. Proc.,Fourth International Conference on Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication (CATaC'04), Karlstad, Sweden, 27 June-1 July 2004. Ed. by F.Sudweeks & Ch. Ess. – Murdoch University, Australia, Publ., 2004, pp. 201-205.

  8. Prehistory (continued)2. The Velham Project The research was based on the cooperation between the Californian and the Moscow research groups; the former provided the hardware and the telecommunication facilities, the latter introduced the new way of communication into the Soviet/Russian academic institutions, libraries, and high schools. The main research results are based on the observation of schoolchildren and adults working and entertaining in the computer-rich environment (the so-called 5th Dimension). References 1.Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard U Press. 2. Papers in the Journal of Russian and East European Psychology.

  9. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND OF THE INTERNET RESEARCH IN RUSSIA Both prehistoric teams included psychologists. The theoretical background of the both projects was the cultural-historical theory of psychic development introduced by Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934). Vygotsky’s main publications in English: Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language, Cambridge: Harvard U Press. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge: Harvard U Press. Many other books/papers, and chapters in textbooks are available, too

  10. Theoretical background (continued) Vygotsky emphasized that the higher mental processes (including cognition) are of social origin, their development is based on joint actions (especially within the zone of proximal development, in the child-adult dyad), on interpersonal communication, and presumably on mediated forms of behavior.

  11. Theoretical background (continued) Investigation of mediated forms of behavior is traditional for the Vygotskian approach in (Russian) psychology. The main mediating sources are, according to Vygotsky, physical objects, signs and semiotic systems. Having been internalized (the term common both for J.Piaget and L.Vygotsky), the signs and the methods of handling the material objects form the higher psychological processes. Thus, the individual psychic activity is actually a transformed joint (usually child-adult) activity. As a result, external and internal (mental) activities have the same origin and the same structure, as it is stressed by A.N.Leontiev (in a book Problems of the Development of Mind, Moscow: Progress Publ., 1981) and by many other Vygotsky’s followers.

  12. Theoretical background (continued) Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) originate from highly developed semiotic (sign) systems that mediate and remediate[1]almost every human practical or theoretical activity. Thus research in the field is apt to the paradigm of Vygotskian approach in psychology. The Internet and the WWW are probably the leading social technologies within the ICT field. Research of the Internet/WWW usage patterns is “traditional” within the Vygotskian approach in the Russian psychology. [1]For remediation, see: Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA and London: the Belknap Press of Harvard U Press.

  13. Theoretical background (continued) Computers and the ICT, being primarily semiotic instruments, are externalizedtools, mediating and remediating human psychic activity. Unlike the developmental psychology approach, externalization and notinternalization is of primary interest for anyone doing research of the Internet-mediated forms of cognitive, communicative, or entertaining activities. Progress in technologies means that psychologists should pay much more interest in externalization than they traditionally used to. Thus, psychologists seemed to be the most prepared in Russia team of specialists to initiate any Internet-related research projects.

  14. CURRENT STATUSOF THE CMC RESEARCH, or the INTERNET RELATED/MEDIATED RESEARCH IN RUSSIA

  15. The Russian segment of the Internet audience includes residents of diverse countries (including Israelis) – post-Soviets & born abroad. In the 20th century there were at least four periods of massive migration from Russia. SpyLog (www.spylog.ru) tracker: approximately 45-50% of navigations are made from outside Russia. For example, Global Internet Statistics (by Language) estimates the number of Americans who regularly access the Russian segment of the Internet is over 100,000. The Russian segment includes: Little Russia in San Antonio, Texas (http://mars.uthsca.edu/Russian), Israeli sites, e.a.

  16. Global Internet Statistics (by Language) The *latest* (refer to: Fall, 2004) estimated figures of the number of people online in each language zone (native speakers), classified by languages instead of by countries, since people speaking the same language form their own online community no matter what country they happen to live in. Source: Global Reach (global-reach.biz/globstats/)

  17. Reasons for Joining the Russian Internet Community Several ethnic_language_segments, presented on the Internet, may be called ‘points of attraction’. These are languages other than English. The Russian segment of the Internet is a ‘PoA’. Method: discussions (F2F or mediated, but not formal interviews) with non-Russian residents (N=67), held since 1994.

  18. Reasons for Joining the Russian Internet community: cont’d • Lack/shortage of attractive web content in ethnic languages • Poor command of official languages of post-Soviet states by ethnic Russians, residing outside Russia • Poor literacy skills in their mother-tongues of non-Russians in the post-Soviet states: they got formal education in Russian. • Use of Arabic or Latin alphabets in some post-Soviet states, instead of a modified Cyrillics. A peculiar sociolinguistic situation: different generations speaking the same language might soon have no common written language. • Less populated countries: few forums, sites, blogs in ethnic languages; more diverse views and more valuable information may be found abroad. Residents of post-Soviet states often have better command of Russian than of English.

  19. Reasons for Joining the Russian Internet community: cont’d • Nostalgia towards older times: chatting from abroad to people someone used to know earlier, or to new chatters; share hobbies 7. Media in some post-Soviet states are even less independent compared to the Russian media: residents of these countries get access to less censured news 8. Politically-minded people keep group discussions; they blame the communist regime, and/or the modern regimes 9. Creative people from outside Russia present their artworks to a wider audience compared to what is available in theirstates 10. Russian Internet experts are often advanced. Non-Russians subscribe to the Russian language newsgroups, surf reviews published on Russian web-sites, discuss technical issues. 11. Speakers of Russian residing outside the former USSR feel themselves ‘missionaries’: consult in web-related issues, provide information (folk or avant-garde music, etc.).

  20. Some references • Voiskounsky, A. E. (1999). Internet: Culture, diversity and unification, Javnost - The Public. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, VI(4), 53-65. • Voiskounsky, A., and Hilton, T. S. (1995). Global networking and remote communities formation, Information systems and global competitiveness,Proceedings of the International Association for Computer Information Systems, Toronto, Canada: IACIS Press, pp. 282-287. • Voiskounsky, A.E.Internet: Clusters of Attractiveness. (2002). Electronic Journal of Communication / La Revue Electronique de Communication. Volume 12 (3-4). http://www.cios.org/getfile/voiskoun_v12n34

  21. Actual Research Areas • Philosophy • Political Science • Education • Culture & Gender Research • Linguistics, Literary & Art Critics • Sociology • Applied Statistics • Economics • Psychology

  22. PhilosophyA seminar at the Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences; some edited volumes & theses of the Ph.D. level;seminars at different universities; Major themes: new approaches toward the unique & the multiple, the natural & the artificial, the real & the virtual; new identities;sociality of gadgets; critics and/or development of the heritage of foreign philosophers (mainly the French ones), etc.

  23. Culture and Gender Research • Research on web cultures in post-Soviet & post-communist states • Digital divide & inequality of access to the Web • Role of non-residents in the Russian web culture • Web-related shift in culture identities • Gender identities on the web • Gender attitudes toward the Internet use • Gender differences in the web use, etc.

  24. Culture & Gender (continued): some references • Voiskounsky A. (1999). Internet: Culture, Diversity and Unification. Javnost – The Public. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, Vol. V(4), pp. 53-65. • Voiskounsky A.E. Culture specifics on the Internet. Asian-Pacific Human-Computer Interaction (APCHI'96) Conf. Proc., Eds. Lim Kee Yong, Linda Herman, Ying K. Leung & Jackie Moyes. Singapore: ITI, 1996, pp. 151-161. • Voiskounsky A. Internet Culture in Russia. Internet-based teaching and learning (IN-TELE) 99. Proc., IN-TELE 99 Conference. Frankfurt a/M: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 36-44. • Mitina O.V., Voiskounsky A.E. (2005). GENDER DIFFERENCES OF THE INTERNET-RELATED STEREOTYPES IN RUSSIA. To be published in: PsychNology Journal (www.psychnology.org) , December, 2005.

  25. Education Projects on distant education Didactics of remote learning in virtual groups Remote competitions for K-12 & adults in different fields, including effectiveness of the web search Advanced teaching programs for gifted & talented kids Education of high-school teachers (governmental and/or private programs, e.g. www.fio.ru, www.iatp.org)

  26. FIO = Federation of Internet Education (in Russian) FIO (www.fio.ru/) is a non-profit investment into Russian education, owned solely by JUKOS Since 1999: 43 educational centres have been organized (usually located at local Universities). 130,000 teachers have been extensively taught (~9% of school teachers in Russia). Source: www.fid.ru/forum/Musher/ Education, continued

  27. Linguistics, Literature & Art Critics • Web fiction & verses as an example of a postmodern literature • Use of hypertexts & chats in fiction • Digitalart as a new cultural phenomenon • Web publications – a new genre? • Investigation of computer slang/argot, SMS & online genres, etc. • The 1st monograph on functioning of Russian language on the Internet, by G.Trofimova (http://planeta.gramota.ru/gnt.html)

  28. Political Science • Analysis of web-sites, web-pages & web-portals of political parties & political leaders • Web-mediated confrontations between political groups • Web-discussions of modern political theories; • Web-forums, blogs & newsgroups on internal & external politics in post-Soviet states, etc. • Researchers contribute to an official ‘e-government Program’: only several years ago Russia took 74th position (out of 103) in the rating of the use of web technologies by national governments (transparency & interactivity were estimated). Source: http://cyprg.arizona.edu/hypo_content.htm

  29. Economics • Digital economics • Tendencies toward globalization & anti-globalization • Web-based economics: B2B & B2C, etc. • High technologies & economics • ‘Brain drain’ & offshore IT economics • Internet as an advertisingmedium • For some information (in English) on IT market research, click: www.auriga.ru/it_market_resea.html

  30. E-mail & online surveys, self-selected respondents Representat-ive fieldwork research, quoted respondents Sociology

  31. Sociology(continued) - Amateur„census-like“ survey www.stars.ru/people.htm, August-September, 1998, 33,201 respondents (2nd survey was held in 1999) - Numerous episodic surveys of certain site’s visitors - Episodic Professional Web surveys (self-selected respondents). Example: Gallup Ltd. (May-June, 1999, in S.Peterburg) www.rocit.ru/opinions/research.htm - Yearly e-mail monitoring (combined self-selected and sample-constructing principles), 1992 -1998. Brief results are available at: www.ripn.net Reference: Voiskounsky A. (1998). Investigation of Relcom Network Users. – F.Sudweeks et al. (eds.). Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 113-126.

  32. www.comcon-2.com - the pioneer, started in 1996, cities only, kids including, no free data available since 2002 www.gallup.ru cities only, no kids, no free data available www.monitoring.ru no kids, no free data available www.gfk.ru or mr.gfk.ru(Austrian company) towns only, no kids, no free data available Most of the companies carry on quarterly surveys. www.fom.ru (The Public Opinion Foundation) Since 2001; cities/towns/villages; no kids; quarterly research (fieldwork + panel), data fully available (the last refer to Summer, 2005); methodology compatible with that of Nielsen/NetRatings Sociology (continued)Representative Fieldwork, Internet Audience

  33. Sociology (continued) Several organizations & companies (e.g., www.masmi.ru, www.romir.ru, etc.) carry on episodic surveys. International sources present alwaysoutdated information on the Internet audience in Russia: e.g., the InternationalDevelopment Corporationwww.idc.com(www.idcrussia.ru or www.idccentraleurope.com),or the US Government 2000 report www.tradeport.org/ts/countries/russia/isa/isar0012, or the eLab report, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennesseewww.2000ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/papers/Internet_in_Russia,or the F. Ebert Foundat. www.riisnp.ru/PUBLIC/russia100. At the nua.iethe “Russian” entries refer to outdated figures.

  34. Sociology (continued)The FOM Data (Summer 2005)) • Total & regional data • Activity of web users • Places of web access • Interests • Total Demography (by gender, age, level of education, etc.) • Earnings & web use

  35. 5.9 mln daily aud. 11.2. mln weekly audience 16.1 mln monthly audience 18.9 mln quarterly audience 20.9 mln 6-month audience 19 % of population (23 % males, 16 % females) 57 % males, 43 % females 38 % age 18-24 29 % age 25-34 17 % age 35-44 13 % age 45-54 3 % age 55 & older FOM data (continued)Sociology of web use in Russia (Summer 2005)No children/teenagers: the data refer to 18+

  36. Applied Statistics • www.yandex.ru/chisla statistics from the major Russian search engine provider Yandex • rumetrica.rambler.ru/data/ statistics from the 2nd major search engine provider (based on the Rambler’s Top 100, i.e. visitor’s index of the most visited Russian URLs) See these two sources to learn: the number of unique servers & unique URLs, the current amountof content (~ 5.00 Gb)

  37. “Black Square” (under painter Malevich). www.lexa.ru/lexa/blackA click within the square opens a webserver www.yandex.ru/nini Weekly index of the most popular key-words inserted (~6,000,000 a day) for the Yandex webspider. Applied statistics (continued)Yandex Statistics (May 17, 2004)

  38. Applied statistics (continued)Index of daily activity (from the Rambler Statistics) • ~2/3 residents of Russia • ~7-9 % Ukrainians • ~2.0 % USA/Canadians • Less than 2.0 % • Israeli • Estonians • Germans • Byelarussians • Kazakhstans

  39. http://psynet.carfax.ru/ http://cyberpsychology.report.ru/ www.psychology.ru/internet/ecology/ http://www.nedug.ru/lib/ http://psy.piter.com/library http://www.auditorium.ru/ http://www.relarn.ru:8080/human/ http://www.fio.ru http://flogiston.ru/articles/netpsy http://redeyes.ru/ http://add.net.ru/ http://psynet.by.ru http://sufism.ru/ The main websites on cyberpsychology (in Russian) /

  40. Psychology (projects) • Identity transformations (some diploma & PHD theses) • Comparative research of the development of the Internet users‘ communities in the Eastern/Central European transient post-communist states (Moscow/Ljubljana Univ.) • Internet addiction • Gender issues on the Internet • Attitudes towards hacking, and motivation of hackers (see the next two slides) • Flow in online gaming (comparative study: samples of Russian, French & Chinese MUDders) • IT-Giftedness • Psychology of Cyberethics

  41. Psychology Projects (cont’d) The next slide will be illustrative of the development of computer hackers’ intrinsic motivation, namely the flow motivation. It is illustrated as a balance/counterbalance of the available skills & of task challenges.

  42. Psychology (continued)REFERENCES • Arestova, O., Babanin, L., Voiskounsky, A. (1999). Psychological Research of Computer-Mediated Communication in Russia. Behaviour and Information Technology, 18 (2), 141-147. • Voiskounsky A. (1998). Investigation of Relcom Network Users. In: F.Sudweeks et al. (eds.). Network and Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 113-126. • Voiskounsky A.E., Babaeva J.D., Smyslova O.V. Attitudes towards computer hacking in Russia. – Cybercrime: Law Enforcement, Security and Surveillance in the Information Age. – Ed. By D.Thomas & B.Loader. – L. & NY: Routledge, 2000, pp. 56-84.

  43. Psychology (continued)References (Continued) • Babaeva J.D., Voiskounsky A.E. IT-Giftedness in Children and Adolescents. Educational Technology & Society, vol. 5(1), 2002, pp. 154-162. http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_1_2002/babaeva.html , http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_1_2002/babaeva.pdf • Voiskounsky A.E., Smyslova O.V. Flow-Based Model of Computer Hackers’ Motivation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 6, № 3, 2003, pp. 171-180. • Voiskounsky A.E., Smyslova O.V. Flow in Computer Hackers’ Activity. // 8th International Conference on Motivation (Workshop on Achievement and Task Motivation). Abstracts. – Moscow, 2002, pp. 128-129. • Voiskounsky A.E., Smyslova O.V. Flow in computer hacking: A model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2713. – Berlin e.a.: Springer, 2003, pp. 176-186.

  44. Russians F1 = Flow F2 = Achievements F3 = Activity vs. passivity F4 = Interaction F5 = Thoughtfulness vs. spontaneity F6 = Cognition French F1 = Achievements F2 = Interaction and Cognition F3 = Flow Factor models for Russian & French samples of MUDders (explorative analysis)

  45. Psychology (continued)References • Voiskounsky A.E., Mitina O.V., Avetisova A.A. Communicative Patterns and Flow Experience of MUD Players. Int. J. of • Advanced Media and Communication, V 1(1), 2005, pp. 5-25. • Voiskounsky A.E., Mitina O.V., Avetisova A.A. Playing Online Games: Flow Experience. PsychNology Journal, 2004, Volume 2, Number 3, pp. 259 – 281. www.psychnology.org/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_2_3_VOISKOUNSKY.PDF

  46. Cyberethics Meets Developmental Psychology Open-ended questionson moral judgmentsshow: Adolescents/kids often fail to transfer well-known moral norms to less known, e.g. virtual environments. In the Cyberspace they lack ‘ethical sensitivity’, that is, the ability to distinguish moral/immoral behavior.

More Related