1 / 47

Phillipi Horticultural Area (PHA)

Phillipi Horticultural Area (PHA). Human impact o n the environment Gr 11 2013. Conditions of use of this overview of the PHA ppt presentation, articles and worksheets.

nani
Télécharger la présentation

Phillipi Horticultural Area (PHA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PhillipiHorticultural Area (PHA) Human impact on the environment Gr 11 2013

  2. Conditions of use of this overview of the PHA ppt presentation, articles and worksheets. • This presentation is intended to introduce you, the educator, to the complexities of the PHA and to equip you to potentially use this local case study to give students a hands-on overview of this section of the syllabus, as it is topical, controversial and relevant. • It is a compilation of slides extracted from talks given by NazeerSonday (spokesperson for the farmers and other organisations aiming to preserve the PHA) and a professional City of Cape Town planner and conservationist to a school’s learners, as well as some comments and discussions held amongst learners at the school after the presentations. The material presented is NOT to be used as such for other presentations please, as it is not original. • Newspaper articles clipped from the Cape Times have been scanned and possible aspects which can be investigated accompany this overview. The worksheets and accompanying suggestions for approaching this topic are original and may be used for educational purposes at your school. • Please consult the City of Cape Town’s website for further elucidation of aspects and policies mentioned in the presentation.

  3. Location of the PHA: Western Cape

  4. Source: Strategic Information, Strategic Development Information and GIS Department, updated - 2008/09/29

  5. How the PHA has shrunk over time.

  6. Land ownership in PHA • Almost entirely privately owned land • Non-horticultural land either wetland, dune, or biodiversity. • Also illegal & non-conforming uses

  7. Agriculture areas farmed in last 15 years

  8. Farmed and non-farmed areas in the Northern PHA Highlands Estate Ottery Road • Summer: January 2007 Ottery Shopping Centre Olieboom Road Strandfontein Road Boundary Road Varkensvlei Road

  9. How water and farming challenges differ from season to season(black areas are water bodies).

  10. Farmed and non-farmed areas in the Northern PHA Highlands Estate Ottery Road • Spring: September 2007 Ottery Shopping Centre Olieboom Road Strandfontein Road Boundary Road Varkensvlei Road

  11. 2km Cape Flats Aquifer

  12. Water Security Role: Cape Flats aquifer Cape Flats Aquifer: Extent, Depth, Capacity & Quality • Yield: ±18 million m³/annum. • Aquifer transmissivity greatest in south-east of PHA • Aquifer requires testing as a potable source • Aquifer impacted negatively by horticulture but toxin levels ‘acceptable’. • UNEPA study in 2006 concluded Cape Flats Aquifer can possibly supply TWO THIRDS of Cape Town’s drinking water supply. • PHA farmers tap into aquifer for all year production.

  13. Present & Future: Predicted demand & identified supply-side interventions High Water Requirement Curve 4. Cape Flats Aquifer Actual Water Requirement Curve Low Water Requirement Curve with WC/WDM

  14. Surface water in the PHA • Generally low-lying area, due mainly to sand-mining (agreement) down to 1m above water table. • Numerous large perennial wetlands & many seasonal wetlands

  15. Role of the PHA currently in the City Metropolitan area • Food security. • Water security. • Economic: - Employment (farm labourers, packaging, sorting, selling). - Cut flowers. • Mining: • Building sand supply. • High quality silica deposits (for glass manufacturing).

  16. Food insecurity in Africa Source: AFSUN_ African Urban Food Security Network_ Battersby

  17. Food security in the Western Cape • Western Cape is a water scarce region: (hot dry summers & semi-desert hinterland) • Mediterranean climate not conducive to domestic vegetable gardening. • Western Cape identified as a climate change ‘at risk’ area. • Food security is about both production and access • 80% of population in CT’s poor households estimated to have food insecurity .

  18. PHA’s Food Security Role • Philippi Horticultural Area has access to free water from the Cape Flats Aquifer. • Very close to markets (most importantly for poor households) • Produces over 50 different crops & 50% of City’s fresh vegetables. • Produces 100 000 tonnes /year at value R150m /year ‘at farm gate’ • Productivity at R90 000/ha- for viticulture it is R18 000/ha • Can produce 2,5x (5x in South –West ) crops p.a. due to cool sea breezes • Close to two WWTW & potentially more water sources • Contributes to nutritional needs of 2 to 3 000 employees (2.5kg / day) • Transport cost break-point: Refrigeration required beyond 120km • Unique productive green lung. • Agricultural land redistribution potential. • Massive opportunity for production & employment increases (c.300%) • Agri-processing and research opportunities: (UWC’s Elsenburg?)

  19. Mining • Building sand: • Deposits in Cape Town area will last for 20 years • PHA the principal supplier, but remaining deposits limited to south-east area • Mining permitted down to not lower than general surface level of surrounding area • Glass sand: • Silica sand underlies entire PHA , but only accessible near surface in centre • No comparable deposits anywhere in SA • Major deposit -15m deep & 315mill tons • Land surface rights: • Subject to Mineral & Petroleum Resources Development Act

  20. Stakeholders in the PHA • City of Cape Town (Mayor Patricia de Lille) and urban developers: 2 sites being contested-Rapicorp and MSP for rezoning. • Phillipi Farmers and civic associations: spokesperson NazeerSonday. • Communities in the Western Cape who are supplied with fresh produce from the PHA.

  21. Urban edge • Urban edge – ineffective monitoring causing problems. • Illegal establishment of businesses in the urban edge over time. • Rezoning of land in the urban edge is being considered from agricultural to mixed zoning, due to the changes that have been allowed by authorities through lack of monitoring in the urban edge.

  22. Issues being contested by stakeholders • Proposed moving of the urban edge (making the PHA smaller)- rezoning from horticulture to mixed. • The best farming land is in thesouth of the PHA. This land is currently owned by developers and so it is not being farmed. Farmers want this land. • Farmers in the north experience difficulties with farming (dry, limited water access, poor soil quality). They are keen to sell their land to developers and buy farming land in the south of the PHA.

  23. Political vs. professionaldecision- making for areas like the PHA. • Professional town planners and conservationists have a 100 year plan in place for the PHA and other areas in the City Metropolitan area. • Each time a political party wins an election (potentially every few years) , there is pressure on the party to deliver on promises made in elections or to meet demands by communities in order to ensure continued support of the party. • Lack of funding can prevent timeous provision of infrastructure and serviced sites to communities by municipalities (which are run by political parties). • By allowing developers to build housing developments with the intrinsic infrastructure needed, some of the pressure on local municipalities to provide serviced sites and infrastructure is alleviated, so developers have leverage over politicians who benefit from the good press associated with infrastructure delivery.

  24. 1. The City’s response and way forward.

  25. Increasing PHA Challenges identified by the City of Cape Town. • Speculation (MSP and Rapicorp sites) • Potential irrigation viability problems • Illegal development • Crime • Traffic congestion • Mixed press • Illegal dumping of solid waste Lansdowne RoadIndustrial Area Springfield Road Jabula Engen Weltevreden Wedge Smallville Williston Siqualo Egoli Schaapkraal Jim se Bos Rapicorp Site MSP Site

  26. Policy Responses from the City of Cape Town. • Cape Town Spatial Development Framework • Cape Flats District Plan

  27. Latest Developments & Moving Ahead Policy Responses from the City of Cape Town • Schaapkraal Urban Edge & Development Guidelines Policy: draft

  28. Latest Developments & Moving Ahead City of Cape Town Policy Responses • Weltevreden Wedge Urban Edge & Development Guidelines Policy: draft

  29. Alternative land uses in the PHA Potential urban infill & intensification areas

  30. Alternative land uses in the PHA Potential urban infill & intensification areas

  31. 2. The Civic and farming associations viewpoints and solutions:

  32. The Civic and farming organisations vision plan for the PHA.

  33. The PHA Vision Plan • Creating a • win-win • solution through developing a bold community-driven spatial design plan!

  34. The PHA Vision Plan Developing a shared vision for the future • Local stakeholders: • Schaapkraal Civic and Environmental Association • Developing farmers Association • Highlands Estate ratepayer Association • PHA Sector Crime Forum • Commercial farmers • Philippi Horticulture Housing Committee • Farmworkers ………..AND

  35. The PHA Vision Plan Supporters and fan club • Soil for Life • Abhalimi Bezekaya • Makassa Food Growers • LOGRA Civic • Coalition for Environmental Justice • The Khayelitsha Development Forum • The Mitchell’s Plain Education Forum • The Ottery Ratepayers Association • Centre for African Studies • African Food Security Urban Network • CoCT PEPCO study, 2009 • Philippi East Development Initiative • False Bay Ecology Park • WESSA • And growing….

  36. Read it and get with it… • The reports and studies…………………………its unanimous! • PHA Task Team Study, 2009 _________ save the PHA! • PHA AFSUN Report, 2012 ___________ save the PHA! • PHA Synthesis Report, 2013 __________ save the PHA!

  37. Doing the democracy thing… • Strong and proactive community based organisations ____check! • Input on IDP’s _________ check! • On-going ward councillors engagements __________check! • Input in CoCT Spatial development framework, 2011 _____________________check! Schaapkraal Civic and Environmental Association- SCEA- meeting

  38. Doing the democracy thing… • One day Subcouncil workshop on PHA issues, 18 February 2012 __ ______________________ check! • Subcouncil activity day, September 2012 _________________ check! Councillors and council officials on a walk-about in the PHA

  39. Doing the democracy thing… • Meeting MEC Anton Bredell, September 2012 _____________ ____________check! • Escalation of PHA illegal dumping issues • Escalation of development planning issues • Prof Battersby presenting AFSUN PHA Report.

  40. Doing the democracy thing… • Presenting PHA Vision Plan • Escalating PHA illegal dumping issues. • Raising Housing issues for informal settlement community. • Meeting the Executive Mayor Patricia De Lille _8 November 2012 ___ _____________ check!

  41. But the threat remains… Rapicorp122 472ha Landgrab • 16 October 2008 Rapicorp (marked in blue) makes an application to the city for the amendment of the Urban Structure Plan to allow a housing development. • 12 May 2009 CoCT commission on “to plan for and manage the PHA into the future” recommends that the area be retained for farming. • 26 November 2009 a full Council Meeting resolves not to amend the Urban Structure Plan as requested by Rapicorp and confirmed the “current and potential significant value of the PHA to the city’s food and water security” and for land reform.

  42. But the threat remains… • 4. In May 2011 the Cape Town Special Development Framework (SDF) was approved by Council in terms of the Municipal Systems Act, within which the ‘Rapicorp’ land was retained as part of the PHA. • 5. March 2011 the MEC Anton Bredell approves the Cape Town SDF in terms of the Land Use Planning Ordinance (LUPO) but he unilaterally redraws the urban edge to exclude the future food growing capacity of the PHA- the ‘Rapicorp’ land. • 16 July 2013 MAYCO announces it will support 300ha for urban development on farmlands where veggies are growing for MSP developers (marked in red).

  43. How you can help…. • Please join our campaign • Talk to your councillor, talk to Zille and President Zuma • Write a letter to the newspaper. • Talk to your local retail chain store manager. • Sign Save the PHA petition • Contact us on: • Email: phaletters@gmail.com • Facebook: food & Farming for the Cape Flats • nasonday@gmail.com

  44. How can you become an activist for change? • Talk to your school chommies, teachers, parents • Start a school petition. • Sign and share the save the PHA AVAAZ online petition. • Like our Facebook page; • Food & Farming for the Cape Flats • Write to: • Mayor Patricia de Lille • Mayor.Mayor@capetown.gov.za • Premier Helen Zille • premier@pgwc.gov.za • Dear editor; • arglet@inl.co.za • ctletters@inl.co.za

  45. Now you know the facts about the PHA, you decide!

More Related