1 / 21

Inferring effective forces in collective motion

Inferring effective forces in collective motion. Yael Katz , Christos Ioannou , Kolbjørn Tunstrøm and Iain Couzin Dept. of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Princeton University Cristi á n Huepe

nascha
Télécharger la présentation

Inferring effective forces in collective motion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inferring effective forces in collective motion Yael Katz, Christos Ioannou, Kolbjørn Tunstrøm and Iain Couzin Dept. of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Princeton University Cristián Huepe Unaffiliated NSF Grantee Cristian Huepe Labs Inc. - Chicago IL This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. DMS-0507745 & PHY-0848755

  2. Outline • Overview • Background • Some basic models of collective motion • Challenge: The inverse problem • A detailed effective-force analysis • Fish schooling: quasi 2D experiments • Model-free approach • Effective-forces: results

  3. – Background • Motivation • Collective motion is observed in diverse animal species, not only in bacteria. • Fish schools & bird flocks can involve from a few individuals to several thousands • Locust swarms can contain 109 individuals traveling thousands of kilometers

  4. – Challenges • Current efforts • Quantitative experiments • Distinguishing generic and specific behaviors • Challenges in modeling • Different models produce similar dynamics • We can beprejudiced by familiar interactions • The inverse problem: • Deducing the interaction rules from collective dynamics

  5. Generic rules (from computer graphics) Intuitive flocking algorithm (Craig Reynolds – Sony) • Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model Computer Graphics, 21(4), pp. 25-34, 1987 • Defined Boids and simple interaction rules: ▪ Separation ▪ Alignment ▪ Cohesion

  6. – The Vicsek model • Motivation • Non-equilibrium swarming dynamics • Emerging collective behavior • Statistical description • Complex behavior • The Vicsek model • Other models • Agent-based algorithms • Discrete time • Continuous time (ODEs) • Field-based descriptions (PDEs)

  7. – A more biological model The “zones” model Journal of Theoretical Biology (2002) 218, 1-11 I. D. Couzin, J. Krause, R. James, G. D. Ruxton & N. R. Franks - “Insect-like” swarm: - Torus, “milling”: - Migration, flocking:

  8. - Challenge: The inverse problem • Different algorithms yield similar collective motion • What interactions are animal swarms actually using? • Are we making underlying assumptions? • In other words: • Can we properly address the inverse problem?

  9. Outline • Overview • Background • Some basic models of collective motion • Challenge: The inverse problem • A detailed effective-force analysis • Fish schooling: quasi 2D experiments • Model-free approach • Effective-forces: results

  10. Experimental System Work with: Prof Iain Couzin, Dr Yael Katz, Dr Kolbjørn Tunstrøm Dr Christos Ioannou Other collaborators: Dr Andrey Sokolov Andrew Hartnett, Etc. Princeton University

  11. 1000 fish dynamics

  12. 1000 fish dynamics

  13. The effective-force approach • Method • Measure mean effective forces on 2-fish & 3-fish systems • Use large dataset: 14 experiments of 56 minutes each • Use classical mechanics formalism (force-driven systems) • F=ma & trajectories given by (q,p) per degree of freedom • Goals • “Model-free” approach on clear mathematical grounds • Gain intuition over multiple possible dynamical dependencies • Study deviations from classical mechanics • Memory, higher-order interactions, etc. • Other methods • Maximum entropy • Bayesian inference

  14. The two-fish system • Space-like variables: • Distance front-back • Distance left-right • Velocity-like variables: • Neighbor fish speed • Focal fish speed • Relative heading • Acceleration-like variables? • Neighbor fish turning rate • Neighbor fish speeding • Focal fish turning rate • Focal fish speeding

  15. Position-dependent forces • Zero force  • high density • ||v||>0.5 BL/s • F||(y), F=(x)

  16. Velocity-dependent forces • Higher speed  • larger forces & • preferred y-distance • Aligned  Higher F|| • Misaligned  Higher F

  17. Temporal correlation Orientation information  Front to back Speed information  Both ways

  18. The three-body problem

  19. Intrinsic 3-body interaction Residual 3-body interaction: Residual 3-body interaction: “Non-negligible” “Negligible” Best match: Best match:

  20. Conclusions • Using an effective-force approach we found that: • Within the interaction zone, speeding depends mainly on front-back distance, and turning on left-right distance • Trailing fish turn to follow fish in front but adjust speed to follow neighbors in front orbehind • Alignment emerges from attraction/repulsion interactions: No evidence for explicit alignment • Tuning response is approximately averaged while speeding is between averaging and additive • Speeding response follows no linear superposition principle: Residual intrinsic three-body interaction • New models and simulations to analyze • New statistical/emergent properties to find … Fin

  21. … Fin

More Related