1 / 23

Comparison MDT gas engines

Comparison MDT gas engines. Niels Kjemtrup LDF. Gas engine working principles. Fundamentals: Combustion principles for Gas Engines. Figures based on: Mollenhauer, K., Tschöke , H., (2007): Handbuch Dieselmotoren. 3. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.    .

nasim-riddle
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison MDT gas engines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison MDT gas engines • Niels Kjemtrup LDF

  2. Gas engineworkingprinciples Fundamentals: Combustion principles for Gas Engines Figuresbased on: Mollenhauer, K., Tschöke, H., (2007): Handbuch Dieselmotoren. 3. Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 

  3. What do weknowfrom 4-stroke engines Engine Emissions – NOX (SOX, PM) NOX: • Lean burn Otto-cycle low NOx • Diesel-cycle combustion high NOx NOX [g/kWh] SOX and Particle Matters (PM): • Emissions of SOX and PM depend on the pilot fuel oil consumption: • GI: 1-5% pilot (of MCR) • DF: ~1% pilot (of MCR) • G: No Pilot Engine Load [%] 51/60DF (MZ 80) 4T50ME-GI-X  48/60CR (HFO) 35/44G 

  4. What do weknowfrom 4-stroke engines Engine Emissions – Greenhouse Gas (GHG) GHG[g/kWh] 51/60DF (MZ 80) 48/60CR (HFO) http://www.enwin.com/kids/conservation/greenhouse_effect.cfm S70ME-GI, L1 35/44G Engine Load [%] Definition: All gases which influence the greenhouse effect given as mass equivalent to CO2 • For gas engines, mainly CO2 and CH4 emissions are relevant • GHG = CO2 + 25 * (4/3) * CH4 as C1 

  5. What do weknowfrom 4-stroke engines Engine Efficiency • Engine efficiency without preconditioning of fuel gas supply ηmech 51/60DF (MZ 80) S70ME-GI, L1 35/44G Engine Load [%] 

  6. DF: From Gas Tank to Engine Fuel Gas Supply System DF Engine Cyrogenic pump LP Compressor 10 bar 45 dg. C LP Compressor Varporizer 3337813.2011.05.18 (LB/LRJ)

  7. ME-GI: From Gas Tank to Engine Fuel Gas Supply System ME-GI Engine 300 bar 45oC 3337813.2011.05.18 (LB/LRJ)

  8. Design Examples: 4T50ME-GI-X (Gas Diesel engine) • Connection block for: • Gas inlet/outlet, Hydraulic oil, Sealing oil, Hydraulic oil drain, Oil drain, Low pressure oil, Double wall ventilation system 

  9. DF / G - System Relatively simple low pressure gas supply Mainly easy to change maintenance components w/o further adjustment: Spark plug Pilot injector Gas valves Pre-Chamber Check Valve ... Few pipes necessary to assure full functionality: Gas inlet Pilot fuel inlet (DF) or pilot gas inlet (G) Pilot fuel drain (DF) Maintenance of Gas Systems on Engine GI- System • 300bar high pressure gas supply • All pipes connected to a fixated distribution block to ease maintenance and to assure full functionality: • Gas inlet • Gas outlet • Hydraulic oil • Sealing oil • Hydraulic oil drain • Oil drain from window/shutdown valve and gas injection valves • Low pressure oil • Double wall ventilation system • Both engines can be serviced by experienced crew & trained service staff 

  10. 25 g/kWh 

  11. 

  12. Pilot Fuel for ignition • Gas injection in top, • Shortly after Pilot injection • ”Diesel combustion” 

  13. 

  14. Pro’s • High efficiency (better than Diesel) • High efficiency at all loads • Stable and reliable ”Diesel Combustion” • No methane slip • Small gas volumes • Fully verified • Con’s • High pressure supply system • Needs EGR/SCR for Tier III 

  15. 

  16. GI • IMO Tier II Compliance in combination • With SCR/EGR • Safe and reliable diesel operation • No knocking • No Derating • No special requirements to • Methane Quality • Dual Fuel (NG/HFO)Capability without • methane slip Yes! Yes! Yes! 

  17. 

  18. Tier III Propulsion System on GasAll use Same Tank system • 4T DFDE: • Con’s / Pro’s • Big efficiency losses • Derating, i.e. largerengine • Tier III onlyon gas • LP FGSS • Efficiencyloss (gear) • Derating, i.e. largerengine • Needgensets DF • Tier III onlyon gas • LP FGSS • Derating, i.e. largerengine • Needgensets DF • Tier III onlyon gas • LP FGSS • Need HP/LP FGS5 • Needgensets DF • Noderating, i.e. save cyl. • Need EGR/SCR • Tier III onanyfuel • Best efficiency Tank LP FGSS DFDE Train, more power need 4T DF Mech: DFDE gensets Tank LP FGSS DF Mech. ,eng. + gear 2T DF LP: DFDE gensets Tank LP FGSS LP Low Speed; + 1-2 cyl. 2T DF HP: DFDE gensets Tank HP/LP FGSS HP Low Speed + EGR/SCR

  19. Complete GI Engine Program Available 

  20. 

  21. The GI dual fuel engine has • exactly the same output as • the corresponding Diesel engine • The GI has in GI mode better • SFOC than in Diesel mode • Especially at par and low load • The GI engine in combination • With EGR/SCR is fully IMO Tier III • compliant in both NG and HFO • operation conditions Same as Diesel Betterthan Diesel Compilantwith IMO Tier III In combinationwith SCR/EGR 

  22. 

  23. Design Modifications Diesel  GI • Gas Admission System • Control system • Gas valves • Gas Block • Safety system 

More Related