1 / 90

Platforms and Exchanges

Platforms and Exchanges. Jon Levin Winter 2010 Economics 136. Auction Platforms. Introduction. What is a “platform”? By analogy to computing, where a platform is a hardware architecture or set of standards that that allow software applications to run.

nasim-white
Télécharger la présentation

Platforms and Exchanges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Platforms and Exchanges Jon Levin Winter 2010 Economics 136

  2. Auction Platforms

  3. Introduction • What is a “platform”? • By analogy to computing, where a platform is a hardware architecture or set of standards that that allow software applications to run. • Platform markets bring together different sides of the market to interact. • Many examples: visa payment network, video game systems, online dating sites, iPhone app store, etc. • Today, focus on auction platforms: markets such as eBay, Amazon, financial exchanges, with • A structured environment for buying and selling goods • Often a very specific set of market rules & institutions.

  4. Introduction • Idea 1: Bigger than the auction itself • Auction design: specify the bidding rules, who gets the object(s), and payments to be made. • Search/Information: platform markets help buyers and sellers find one another, and allow them to exchange information (e.g. presentation of informaiton on eBay/Amazon). • Standards: quality scores, reputations scores, grading of used goods, targeting in online ads. • Contract design and enforcement: rules for pricing and exchange and various mechanisms for verifying and enforcing that these rules are followed.

  5. Introduction • Idea 2: Platform creates an ongoing market • We’ve been analyzing auctions “one at a time” • Platform markets generally involve ongoing exchange, many sales every day, market evolves over time. • Platform is setting the rules of the environment, e.g. on eBay the type of ways that sellers can offer stuff to buyers or set prices. • Doesn’t always have to be auctions, e.g. Craigslist and eBay have quite different pricing…

  6. Market design • Platform operators have to consider • How to attract buyers and sellers • How to match them efficiently • How to ensure market runs in an orderly fashion • How are the gains from trade shared • How does the platform make money • Tools for answering these questions • Theoretical models (as in search auction case) • Experiments (very common in online markets) • Data analysis (platforms get to collect a lot of data)

  7. Monopoly platforms • “Indirect” network effects: more buyers attracts more sellers and vice-versa. • Platform may have to decide which side to charge - Does it matter? Why might it matter? • Common to charge one side of the market but not the other (e.g. yellow pages, sponsored search, dance clubs, visa?) • Platform may have to trade off market efficiency (creating a bigger pie) and profit (taking a bigger slice). • Recall our auction design choices in sponsored search.

  8. Competing platforms • Nature of competition and effects of competition depend on single vs multi-homing. • If one side “single-homes,” platform can charge the other side for “unique access” • Can create a lot of competition to attract single-homers, e.g. payments, exclusive contracts. • Scale economies may be very important • Scale can allow platform to improve its technology (fixed costs amortized over more transactions). • Scale effects can also be subtle - sellers like more buyers, but not necessarily more competing sellers!

  9. eBay’s Market Design

  10. eBay and online markets • eBay: largest site for e-commerce • 81,000,000 monthly visitors • 140,000,000 listings on a given day • $8,500,000,000 platform revenue • Competes against Amazon, Craigslist, other online sites, plus many off-line companies. • Today: discuss its marketplace design.

  11. Market + Search Technology • Many heterogeneous objects being sold • Different kinds of sellers and buyers • Range from full-time “pros” to casual participants. • Ongoing market, sequential sales/closes • Multiple pricing mechanisms • Auctions, Posted prices (Buy it Now) • Buyer search • Catalogs/Browsing, Sophisticated search • Featured listings, advertising

  12. Structure of Buyer Search • What distinguishes listings • What is the good, new/used • Who is the seller, reputation, location • What is the sale type: auction, posted price. • Some important issues • Prioritize auctions or posted prices • Catalogue vs non-catalog items • Distinguish sellers, or initially just goods • Conflation? Or emphasize diversity?

  13. Conflation in market design • Emphasize diversity • Traditional eBay search brought up page of listings, organized by auction ending time. • Similar items might look very different – sellers have an incentive to emphasize diversity! • Conflation (a la Amazon, eBay more recently) • Search for product, product is displayed • Sellers, and seller distinctions revealed later. • What are the trade-offs? Do they depend on the nature of the item and perhaps buyer?

  14. Listings and Information • eBay in principle controls what sellers can communicate to buyers • Different types of information in listing • Standardized information • “Free-form” information (photos, videos, text) • Some important issues • eBay imposes relatively little structure on sellers • Only recently has started to collect “extra” information from sellers – why would you do this?

  15. Disclosure and Adverse Selection • Especially for big-ticket items, buyers may be worried about the quality of the item. • There is potential for adverse selection problems. • Seller disclosure might mitigate these issues. • Greg Lewis (2009) study of eBay motors. • Provides empirical evidence by correlating sale prices with amount of information disclosed by sellers.

  16. The Lemons Problem • Three kinds of car: peach, apple, lemon • Buyer values: $2500, $1800, $1100 • Seller values: $2000, $1500, $900 • Seller knows quality, buyer doesn’t • Equal numbers of car types • “Akerlof” lemons problem • At market price > $2000, all sellers will sell, but buyer expected value is only $1800… No trade. • At market price btwn $1500 and $2000, apples and lemons will be available, but then buyer expected value only $1450 • At market price btwn $900 and $1500, only lemons will be available, so buyer value is $1100. • Market eqm: Lemons trade at btwn $900 and $1100.

  17. Disclosure • If quality can be costlessly disclosed • Peach sellers will disclose quality • So apple sellers will also disclose • So buyers will be able to identify lemons! • Then all types of cars will trade… • This “unraveling” result is quite striking • Depends on buyers being sophisticated • Or alternatively, on seller competition… • What happens if disclosure is costly?

  18. Costly disclosure • Back to our example • Buyer values: $2500, $1800, $1100 • Seller values: $2000, $1500, $900 • Suppose disclosure costs $400. • Peaches will disclose, sell for $2000-$2100. • Apples will not disclose – too expensive! • Lemons will trade w/ no disclosure $900-$1100. • Costly disclosure can lead to intermediate trade. Doesn’t have to be the best items that trade, but the items where there are large gains from trade!

  19. Contract/Transaction Design • eBay can place structure on the transaction itself, or facilitate transaction in various ways. • What is the contract? • Seller agrees to provide object as represented. • Some “free form” terms and conditions • Buyer pays first, usually no escrow! • Trust-based (compare with China eBay) • Main issue: safety for buyers…

  20. Reputation mechanisms • Seller reputation helps enforce “contract” • Buyers give feedback post transaction • Sellers also give feedback post transaction • Participants acquire scores – pos. & neg reviews • What are the issues • What is the incentive to give feedback • Retaliation problems • Bolton et al. innovative designs • New programs for “top sellers” – good idea?

  21. Bolton et al. on Reputation • How can you avoid the “retaliation” problem? • Don’t let seller give feedback • Don’t let buyer/seller see each other’s feedback • Mix of disclosed/non-disclosed feedback • What are the trade-offs? • Other reputation issues • Why are the sellers trusted? Why not buyers? • Are there other ways to organize the market? • Markets turn out to be quite local – trust issues?

  22. Auction mechanism • Ascending auction with proxy bidding • Enter “maximum bid” – proxy bids up to maximum • Object awarded to standing high bidder at close • Hard close: auction ends at a fixed time • Secret reserve – minimum bid usual reserve, but possible an extra “secret” reserve. • What are the issues? • Sniping (late bids: why does this happen?) • Squatting (early bids: why does this happen?)

  23. Sniping (Roth et al.) • Roth and Ockenfels (2002) • Sniping observed at “hard close” auctions • Sniping doesn’t occur when there is a “soft close” • Why would you wait to the last minute • Early bids might attract attention to a listing • Early bids might signal object was valuable • Even if these benefits are small, the costs of delaying to the last minute are also small or zero. • Squatting is what you expect if the effects go the other way – early bids “scare off” other bidders.

  24. Auctions vs Posted Prices • eBay has moved toward to posted prices • Now more than half of the platform is prices • What are the trade-offs? • Auctions: good for price discovery, maybe fun for buyers, perhaps good for unusual or unique items, forces buyers to compete. • Prices: good for immediacy, speeds up the market potentially, forces sellers to compete. • Why would the market have shifted?

  25. Market design, broadly • What are all these smaller decisions aimed at • Attracting participants • Efficient matching of buyers and sellers • Orderly and safe transactions • How could we assess the efficiency of the market? What measures to look at? • Number of participants and level of engagement, how easily/quickly buyers and sellers can trade, level of prices, amount of fraud, market structure.

  26. Financial Exchanges

  27. Today’s Lecture • Background on financial exchanges • The role of financial exchanges • Desirable attributes of an exchange • History of these markets • Specialist markets, OTC markets, exchanges • The move to electronic exchanges • Market design issues • Information aggregration, large orders • Competing platforms, transparency, dark pools.

  28. Public equity markets • Focus on markets for public equity • Companies issue publicly traded stock. • Historically traded on a few large exchanges • Recently competition between exchanges and a great deal of innovation in exchange design. • Questions to consider • What are the objectives for a successful market? • What designs help achieve these objectives? • What is the role of competition between markets?

  29. Market objectives • Objectives for the public equities market • Price discovery (prices reflect current information) • Fair competition (open access, nondiscrimination) • Investor protection and confidence • US regulates financial markets to achieve these objectives, looking at things such as • How fast are orders executed? How large are spreads? How large is systemic risk (e.g. risk of a complete market shut-down)? Are certain investors being advantaged or disadvantaged? Is there cheating or fraud?

  30. Desirable market properties • Liquidity • In liquid markets, traders can buy or sell large quantities of shares without a large price impact. • Transparency • Participants have information available to them before making a trade (receive a quote, see open offers) and after a trade (see prices, quantities). • Price discovery • Prices incorporate and track available information in the market - and do so in a reasonable and efficient way.

  31. Organization of Markets • Historically, equities in US were mainly traded on the floor of the NYSE. • NYSE as a “specialist” market • Each stock managed by a specialist • Specialist quotes “bid” and “ask” prices • Investors, who are physically on the trading floor, trade with the specialist at these prices • Specialist holds some stock to keep market functioning, but not very large positions.

  32. Organization of Markets • Nasdaq competes with NYSE and was historically an “over the counter” market. • Organization of OTC markets • Small number of “brokers” quote bids/ask to prospective traders, who can trade with any of the brokers. • In some OTC markets, executed trades are posted publicly creating a degree of transparency. • OTC organization is typical for less “liquid” securities: corporate and municipal bonds, derivatives, etc.

  33. Organization of markets • Equity trading has increasingly moved to electronic order books, including at NYSE. • Organization of electronic exchanges • Traders submit orders to buy or sell • Orders are posted in an electronic “book” • If a buy order comes in above a current sell order, the orders are “crossed” and a trade is executed. • Different exchanges allow different types of orders (more on this in a minute).

  34. Organization of markets • Many large trades take place “upstairs” - not on the NYSE floor or in a public exchange • Organization of large trades • Often a bilateral negotiation or by private placement. • Example: investor approaches Goldman Sachs to sell a large position. GS either finds a buyer, or buyers, or buys the position itself and then dribbles it out over time. • Recently, many electronic exchanges are trying to automate large trades by allowing for more sophisticated types of orders (more later).

  35. Recent events: 2005-2009 • Location of trades • In Jan 2005: NYSE accounted for 80% of trading volume in NYSE-listed stocks; by Oct 2009, down to 25% • Execution speeds for trades • Falls from 10.1 seconds in 2005, to 0.7 seconds in 2009. • Trading volume • From 2.1 bn shares/day in 2005 to 5.9 bn in 2009. • Average trade size • Falls from 724 shares in 2005 to 268 shares in 2009

  36. Current market • Trading mostly done on electronic platforms • Five large exchanges (transparent) • Multiple smaller electronic exchanges • Internal or “dark” trading pools (not transparent) • Questions • Does this fragmentation matter? (Offer to buy and sell must be posted publicly to all exchanges.) • Why the proliferation of markets? Should different types of trades be executed in different markets?

  37. Applying economic theory • Price formation and price evolution • “Efficient” markets with asymmetric information • Model bid/ask spreads in specialist markets • Search costs and market frictions • Bid/Ask spreads in OTC markets • Large orders and price impacts • Design of exchanges, and exchange competition.

  38. Modeling price formation • Consider a specialist market • Specialists offer bid price b (offer to buy) and ask price a. • Traders arrive and can buy or sell at these prices. • After trading, world ends, stock pays d ~ U[0,1]. • First consider traders coming to sell… • Two types of traders, equally likely to arrive • Smart trader: knows d, sells only if b>d • Dumb trader: doesn’t know d, sells at any b. • Specialists don’t know d, but they understand the environment and quote a price that ensure they will just break even on average.

  39. Bid prices in market • Specialist quotes a price b • With probability 1/2, dumb trader shows up • Trader sells the stock for b • Specialist makes a profit d-b • With probability 1/2, smart trader shows up • Trader sells the stock if b>d • Specialist makes a profit (really a loss) d-b

  40. Specialist market If dumb trader arrives, sells for b, specialist gets E[d]=1/2 If smart trader arrives, only sells if d<b, I.e. with pr=b If d>b, smart trader will not sell b 0 If d>b, smart trader will sell 1 E[Profit] = (1/2)b - b = - (1/2)b E[Profit] = 0

  41. Bid Prices in Market • What is the expected profit for specialist • If dumb trader: expected profit is 1/2 - b • If smart trader: expected profit is b * [ -(1/2)b ] • Specialist break-even condition E[Profit] = (1/2) * [ 1/2 - b ] + (1/2) * b * (- 1/2* b) = 0 • Solving for the competitive bid price 1/2 - b = 1/2* b2 1-2b-b2 =0 b = 0.414

  42. Ask prices in the market • Now suppose traders may also show up to buy, and specialist quotes an “ask” price. • Two types of buyers, equally likely to arrive • Smart traders: know d and buy if d>a • Dumb traders: don’t know d and buy at any a • Specialists quote an ask price that ensures they will just break even in expectation • Will the ask be above or below the bid?

  43. Ask prices in the market • Specialist quotes an ask a • With probability 1/2, dumb trader arrives • Buys at a • Specialist profit is a-d • With probability 1/2, smart trader arrives • Buys if a<d • Specialist profit is a-d

  44. Solving for ask prices • Specialist expected profit • If dumb trader: profit is a-1/2 • If smart trader: profit is -(1-a)*(1-a)/2. • Solving for the break-even ask price 2a - 1 = (1-a)2 a = 0.586 • Compare to the bid b = 0.414 • The “spread” is a-b, here 0.172

  45. Price Formation & Dynamics • Efficient market theory • Current prices equal E[Value | Current Info]. • True in this theory, except an offer to buy or sell convey NEW information. • So each “buy” trade raises the price and each “sell” trade lowers the price. • Specialists charge a “spread” a>b to protect themselves from private information of the traders. • More liquid market means lower spreads, and probably less movement of prices with each trade.

  46. Competition and Spreads • What makes spreads larger or smaller? • More informed traders => larger spreads • Less specialist competition => larger spreads • Competition and spreads? • If specialist has no competition, can set a=1,b=0. • Trades with probability 1/2, but makes an expected profit of 1/2 on each trade. • Extreme example, but can more generally specialist can increase spread and trade only with the dumb money. • Competition prevents this by forcing spreads to be narrower - but requires traders to be able to “shop”.

More Related