1 / 16

London Colleges Inspection findings Sep 2012 – March 2014 Janet Mercer HMI

London Colleges Inspection findings Sep 2012 – March 2014 Janet Mercer HMI . Birkbeck, University of London 4 June 2014. College inspection – the overall picture. 35 inspections of post 16 institutions 20 GFE; 8 SFC; 1 specialist FE college 2 ISC; 2 HEI (FE in HE)

navid
Télécharger la présentation

London Colleges Inspection findings Sep 2012 – March 2014 Janet Mercer HMI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. London Colleges Inspection findings Sep 2012 – March 2014 Janet Mercer HMI Birkbeck, University of London 4 June 2014

  2. College inspection – the overall picture • 35 inspections of post 16 institutions • 20 GFE; 8 SFC; 1 specialist FE college • 2 ISC; 2 HEI (FE in HE) • 2 16-19 academy/free school

  3. Inspection outcomes – overall effectiveness

  4. Patterns of improvement • OE grade improved in 15 colleges • OE grade declined in 9 colleges • OE grade stayed the same in 8 colleges

  5. OE by types of institution

  6. Characteristics of good/outstanding providersOutcomes • Consistently high or rapidly improving success rates • Little variation in the achievement of different groups of learners • Good progress from starting points • Learners developing good vocational skills • Strong progression to higher level study or employment • Good development of English & maths skills and achievement of qualifications

  7. Characteristics of good/outstanding providersTeaching, learning and assessment • Teachers have consistently high expectations of all learners, and plan well for different abilities • Planning that focuses on learning, not only activities or task completion • Strong tutorial/pastoral support – very close monitoring of progress with good individual target setting • Regular checks on learning and assessment with detailed feedback on improvement points and good use of assessment to plan further learning

  8. Characteristics of good/outstanding providersTeaching, learning and assessment • Some excellent use of teachers’ vocational experience/ live projects/ work placements • Imaginative use of ILT, inc. mobile technology, to enhance learning in and outside lessons, for assessment and feedback and critical reflection

  9. Characteristics of good/outstanding providersLeadership and management • College wide culture of high expectations and challenge • Self-critical evaluation of all provision at all levels • Review of the quality of TLA strongly focused on learning and progress and includes a broad range of evidence • Strong performance management systems which support improvement • Responsive to stakeholders’ needs and views

  10. Frequently recurring areas for improvementOutcomes • Outcomes remain too variable across the college • Poor development of English and maths skills and poor results FS and/or GCSE • Too much poor attendance and/or punctuality which disrupts learning and hinders progress • Learners not developing appropriate vocational/ employment skills • Progression between levels and to further study/employment not always good

  11. Frequently recurring areas for improvementTeaching, learning and assessment • Quality of teaching varies too much within and between different subject areas • Planning not meeting different needs/abilities • Initial assessment/student profiles not used well to inform planning • Teachers not sharing learning objectives with learners, so they are not clear of the purpose of the lesson or activity • Planning and lessons focused on completing tasks/meeting assessment criteria rather than developing and extending learning

  12. Frequently recurring areas for improvementTeaching, learning and assessment • Over-reliance on a limited range of TLA strategies • Too much poor marking and assessment feedback • Too little checking of learning, and questioning not used effectively • English and maths not well-integrated into vocational sessions • ILT not used well to engage learners

  13. Frequently recurring areas for improvementTeaching, learning and assessment • Prior attainment and assessment data not used well to set challenging targets and monitor progress • Tutorials not effective in monitoring progress and not valued by students • Equality and diversity not always well promoted within the curriculum/in lessons

  14. Frequently recurring areas for improvementLeadership and management • Variable quality in curriculum management and rigour of curriculum-level self-assessment and QIPs leading to inconsistent rates of improvement across college • Some overgenerous judgements on quality of TLA and insufficient consideration of impact on learning/progress • Lack of critical challenge from governors on quality and improvement • Strategies to improve English and maths not yet having enough impact

  15. Work with the London AoCAoC/Ofsted action learning projects • Urban Colleges: critical factors and good practice in teaching, learning and assessment in Urban Colleges March 2013 • Improving attendance and punctuality: strategies, approaches and lessons learned from London colleges: an AoC/Ofsted action learning project October 2013 • Supporting young people to participate in education and training: reviewing factors that help or hinder young people aged 16 to 18 living in London to participate in education, employment or training February 2014

  16. Thank you.Any questions?

More Related