1 / 8

Draft Compendium

Draft Compendium. Magda Matczak and Jacek Zaucha Maritime Institute in Gdańsk Rostock 14-15. January 2013. Country

neal
Télécharger la présentation

Draft Compendium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Draft Compendium Magda Matczak and Jacek Zaucha MaritimeInstitutein Gdańsk Rostock 14-15. January 2013

  2. Country • General information about sea: size of territorial sea and EEZ, length of the sea coast, main subparts (zones), key morphological features (perhaps as a map without a written description). • Intensity of the use of the sea space in comparison to Balticaverage and changes in the recent ten years. • Main sea users e.g. shipping, fishery, energy, infrastructure, defense, research, ecology, mining, coastal protection others. • Main drivers behind sea space exploitation (reasons for intensification of the use of the sea space, or lack of such intensification, key policies, key objectives in national and regional documents with regard to use of the sea space, key strategies).

  3. Country (continuing) • Possible future uses and hindrances for their development. • Most important spatial conflicts over the sea (existing conflicts identified in different documents, conflicts identified by experts and stakeholders). • The key features of the policy model for governing sea space development. • Degreeof policy integration (e.g. integrated or disintegrated model, the way how sectoral national and EU policies influence use of the sea space – e.g. directly or indirectly via spatial plans, visions and strategies). • harmonization of decisions over the use of the sea space (existence of one decision centre/agency or parallel functioning of many decision centers not co-operating each with other).

  4. Almost the same questions but separately for the: B) TerritorialSea C) and EEZ (difference is that for territorial sea there is an additional question for land-sea integration). Please also note that management has not been covered (only MSP) 1. Maritime Spatial Plan existing? If yes: 2. MSP legislation in place? If yes:

  5. 1. MSP • legal impact of the plan (legal status) e.g. pilot, binding, indicative etc., • background (drivers), why the plan(s) were developed, • international legislation considered, • objectives of the plan, • basic content: • plan character: i.e. strategic or detailed, • area covered, • scale, • sea uses covered, • types of sea zones applied, • methods for conflict mitigation, • regulations (e.g. use restriction, recommendations, prioritization of uses, etc.),

  6. 1. MSP (continuing) • time horizon, • administrative organization (e.g. responsible MSP agency, other actors involved), • planning process carried out: • planning procedure, • SEA procedure, • public participation, • transboundary consultation, • methods ensuring harmonization with terrestrial plans • approval of the plan • disputes over plan provisions • monitoring and assessment procedures • reference documents (text, maps, English summary), web links.

  7. 2. MSP legislation in place? • legal base (e.g. act or ordinance), • basic content and objectives of MSP legislation, • international legislation considered, • applicability of existing national legislation for land planning. 3. Current activities to put MSP in place  (e.g. preparation of bill, envisaged completion, involvement of stakeholders, test run by projects). 4. Current activities to amend the existing Maritime Spatial Plan or MSP legislation? 5. Future plans with regard to development of MSP legislation (intensions).

  8. Thankyou

More Related