1 / 30

PHMA Conference

PHMA Conference. Military Housing Privatization 101 presented by Lisa Tychsen Office of the Secretary of Defense Housing & Competitive Sourcing. 26 January 2005. Program Background and Legislative Mandate Understanding the MHPI Objectives Housing Privatization Process Overview

nemo
Télécharger la présentation

PHMA Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PHMA Conference Military Housing Privatization 101 presented by Lisa Tychsen Office of the Secretary of Defense Housing & Competitive Sourcing 26 January 2005

  2. Program Background and Legislative Mandate Understanding the MHPI Objectives Housing Privatization Process Overview Primary Legislative Authorities Why We Get More Housing Now using Privatization Why Government Contribution Federal Budgetary Scoring OSD Oversight Current Status of Program Agenda

  3. Shortage of quality, affordable housing available to service members and their families in local communities DoD Housing in need of repair (Historical): Family Housing 600,000 off-base / 15% unsuitable 250,000 on base / 50% need repair $16 billion - 20 years to resolve at current MILCON levels Unaccompanied Housing 100,000 off-base 450,000 on-base / 62% need repair $9 billion - Indefinite period to resolve at current funding levels Not enough MILCON $ to fix the problem Program Background and Legislative Mandate 1

  4. Our Customer

  5. Privatized Housing MCB Camp Pendleton, CA

  6. 1996 National Defense Authorization Act signed into law February 10, 1996 2005 National Defense Authorization Act --Congress removed budgetary cap and made program authorities permanent Major tools contained in law Direct Loans Guarantees: Loan, Rent, Occupancy Investments in Non-Governmental Entities Limited Partnerships Sell, Contribute, Convey, or Lease DoD-Owned Property Differential Lease Payments Lease Housing to be Constructed or Privately Owned Units Assignment of Members and Use of Allotments Program Background and Legislative Mandate

  7. Current State Potential Solutions Future State M A C R O I S S U E S • Privatize Real Estate • Assets and Services • Outsource Services • Dispose of Real Estate Assets • Slow Government Process • Old Housing • Inadequate Resources • Insufficient Capital • Reduced Housing Deficit • Streamlined Government • Revitalized Housing • Leveraged Funds with • Private Resources/Expertise Military Housing Privatization Initiative S O L U T I O N S Award Contract RFQ/RFP Development Proposal Evaluation Site* Nomination Feasibility Assessment Post Award & Monitoring *Local, Regional, National Understanding the MHPI Objectives

  8. Housing Privatization Process Overview Project Identification Project Definition Project Closeout Project Acquisition Project Management Solicitation Development Post Award & Construction Project Monitoring Proposal Evaluation & Project Award

  9. Our Customer

  10. Real Estate Tools Conveyance and/or Lease Rent & Occupancy Guarantees Build-Lease Financial Tools Direct Loans Loan Guarantees Rental payment by Allotment Investment Tools Acquisition of Limited Partnership Interest Stock Bonds Primary Legislative Authorities Nine Broad Categories of Selected Tools Grouped in Three Areas:

  11. DoD may convey or lease property or facilities to people in the private sector who will use that property to provide suitable housing for service members. Present Application Contribution of Government Assets Ground lease of on-base military land Conveyance of existing improvements and off-base land. Primary Legislative Authorities Real Estate Tools - Conveyance or Lease Property

  12. DoD may assure occupancy or rental income in non-governmental entities involved in the acquisition and/or construction of housing and support facilities. Present Application Rental and Occupancy Guarantees are not a useful tool Office of Management and Budget (OMB) scoring rules make this tool cost prohibitive Real Estate Tools- Rent and Occupancy Guarantees Primary Legislative Authorities

  13. Our Customer

  14. DoD may lease housing units to be constructed. Contract may include operations and maintenance. Present Application Not generally considered a useful tool Office of Management and Budget (OMB) scoring rules make this tool cost prohibitive Real Estate Tools- Build/Lease Primary Legislative Authorities

  15. DoD may loan money for the acquisition or construction of suitable housing used for service members DoD may guarantee loans made to people in the private sector if the proceeds of the loans are used to acquire or construct housing units suitable for service members Not to exceed 80% project value or outstanding loan balance, whichever is lower. Finance Tools - Direct Loans & Guarantees Primary Legislative Authorities

  16. Present Application Very useful tools Direct loans are effective tools for covering development gaps. Beneficial OMB scoring relative to other tools Current loan guarantee product is a “limited guarantee”, which protects lenders from risk of base closure, downsizing and deployment -- does not cover economic or market risk. Finance Tools - Direct Loans & Guarantees (continued) Primary Legislative Authorities

  17. DoD may invest in non-governmental entities involved in the acquisition and/or construction of housing and support facilities Limited Partner Stock Purchase Bond Purchase Other equity or debt instruments Or any combination of above. Investments Tools Primary Legislative Authorities

  18. Present Application Useful Tool for Government contribution Current preferred structure for completed and contemplated Navy and Army transactions No benefit from credit reform scoring Investments Tools (continued) Primary Legislative Authorities

  19. Access to private capital Private debt (Banks and other financial sources) Equity Government contribution Land Existing Housing $ -- Debt, Equity, Subsidy Housing Allowance Why We Get More Housing Now using Privatization

  20. Sample ProjectMILCONPrivatization Total Development Cost $ 85.0M $79.4M Gov’t Appropriation $ 85.0M $23.3M Leverage 1:1 3.4:1 (Leverage = MILCON Equivalent/Scored Cost) Why We Get More Housing Now using Privatization

  21. Government contributions, through use of the MHPI Authorities, are made to close development gaps, help improve the feasibility of transactions from a financial cash flow perspective, and to help attract private sector participation (e.g. capital, developers, property managers) Why Government Contribution

  22. Gap Equity Private Debt Can only support private debt due to Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value OPERATIONS NET OPERATINGINCOME - GROSS INCOME OPERATING EXPENSES = GROSS INCOME - NET CASH FLOW DEBT SERVICE = Rent + Other Income - Vacation = Maintenance, Management, Taxes, Insurance + Utilities + Replacement Reserves = Return to Investors Why Government Contribution

  23. Why Government Contribution Authority Appropriation Development Gap $3M Direct Loan $6M Construction Cost Private Sector Mortgage (based on 400 new units) Conveyed Units None $40M $30M Differential Lease Payments $5M Developer Equity Government Equity $6M $4M

  24. What is Scoring? (OMB Circular A-11) How the Federal Government budgets for the cost of government activities Applies to all MHPI projects that expend cash, offer credit, of financially obligates the government to future expenditures (e.g. equity contributions, direct and guaranteed loans, differential lease payments, etc.) Federal Budgetary Scoring

  25. Impact of MHPI Authorities

  26. OSD Oversight • HRMA • Concept Approval • OMB Scoring • Award Brief/Transfer of funds • Program Evaluation Plan • Fact Sheet (project deal structure matrix submitted 60 days after closing) • Monitoring Matrix (submitted every quarter for each project) • Project Summary Report (submitted semi-annually for each project) • Executive Summary (submitted semi-annually for the Service)

  27. Goals: Privatize about 140,000 by the end of FY 2005. Eliminate nearly all inadequates by 2007– or about 160 K units Meeting our goal to eliminate nearly all inadequates by 2007 is a Presidential Management Initiative Privatize over 90% of existing family housing inventory Current Status of Program

  28. Over 82,000 total units privatized as of December 2004 Program has grown more than five times since FY2001 Current Status of Program

  29. Private sector contribution over 85% of total Estimated value of $9.6 billion in total development cost (First 40 Projects) Leverage of 15:1 for appropriated funds (3:1 is minimum standard—OSD is flexible ) Current Status of Program

  30. Thank you --Information • Website www.acq.osd.mil/housing • Contact info: Lisa.Tychsen@osd.mil • Ph. 703/602-4469

More Related