1 / 10

Virtual and Authentic Web-based Ecological Inquiries

Virtual and Authentic Web-based Ecological Inquiries. XB Wu 1 , S Knight 2 , A Webb 2 , M Ziegler 2 , JF Schielack 1 1 Texas A&M University 2 Pennsylvania State University August 8, 2013 Waterbury Summit. Virtual Ecological Inquiry (VEI) in Second Life. Museum

nenet
Télécharger la présentation

Virtual and Authentic Web-based Ecological Inquiries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Virtual and Authentic Web-based Ecological Inquiries XB Wu1, S Knight2, A Webb2, M Ziegler 2,JF Schielack1 1 Texas A&M University 2Pennsylvania State University August 8, 2013 Waterbury Summit

  2. Virtual Ecological Inquiry (VEI)in Second Life • Museum • Explore ecology of Wolong • Formulate hypothesis • Design field investigation • Field plots (Wolong) • Field sampling • Lab • Data analysis and interpretation

  3. Web-based Ecological Inquiry Using BearCam • Based on research of Larry Griffing (TAMU-Biology) on grizzly bear behavior at the McNeil River Fall in Alaska. • Archived photos with stamps of date and time (~800 photos over period of a week) used for the BearCam inquiry project.

  4. Inquiry Process Online group discussions and in-class dialog throughout the process.

  5. Ecology – Disciplinary context of inquiry • Questions (F-CC; F-DCI) • Structure/spatial patterns, relationships • Functions - processes and interactions • Mechanisms and explanations • Approach of inquiry (F-SP) • Observation-based but quantitative • Comparative • Epistemic and Social Practice (F-SP) • Structure and style of written communication • Peer review process • Collaborations

  6. Aim – Learning outcomes of inquiry • Knowledge (F-CC; F-DCI; 21CC) • Develop deeper understanding of focused disciplinary contents • Recognize connections and uncertainties • Practices/Competencies (F-SP; 21CC) • Recognize pattern; frame question; design investigation • Collect, analyze, interpret, and represent data • Argue from evidence, construct explanations, write to communicate • Collaborate - offer and seek feedback; self-evaluate • Understanding of science (F-SP) • Enhance understanding of nature of science and inquiry • Enhance interests and dispositions in science

  7. Distribution of Scores for Inquiry Project Reports 20 reports each selected for VEI and BearCam inquiry projects Low score 0 (meets none of the criteria) to high score 3 (meets all of the criteria)

  8. Next Steps • Refine and expand the functionality • VEI - group-based field investigation; gaming elements • BearCam – expanded data set for more complex investigations • Assessment • Better instrument for understanding of science process • Reflections on the learning • Study the use in different settings • Different types of institutions and populations of students

More Related