1 / 13

Case Study Group 3

Case Study Group 3. Group members 1 Mr. A.K.M Zakir Hossain Bhuiyan 2 Mr. Jegannath Adhikari 3 Mr. Rammani Duwadi 4 Ms. Sochheary Chem 5 Dr. Watana Pattanapongse 6 Ms. Pimprapei Intaravitah 7 Mr. Hailin Zheng. OUTLINE. Background Information Theory of Change

neola
Télécharger la présentation

Case Study Group 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case Study Group 3 Group members 1 Mr. A.K.M ZakirHossainBhuiyan 2 Mr. JegannathAdhikari 3 Mr. RammaniDuwadi 4 Ms. SochhearyChem 5 Dr. WatanaPattanapongse 6 Ms. PimprapeiIntaravitah 7 Mr. HailinZheng

  2. OUTLINE • Background Information • Theory of Change • Evaluation Questions • Impact Evaluation Design • Management Structure • Timeline for IE

  3. Background Information • A baseline survey indicates that up to 47% of children in China’s Guizhou province are infected with intestinal worms.

  4. PROBLEM • Local health officials are slow in providing treatment interventions due to lack of right incentives

  5. INTERVENTIONS • Health education training • Financial subsidy • Incentive for doctors

  6. Theory of Change Activities -Provide health education training programme to doctors/villagers -Allocate financial resource to implement the health education programme -Offer doctors a financial incentive to keep worms prevalence down Input -Budget (Gov’t& WHO) -Doctors & Practitioner -Medical Equipments -Baseline data

  7. Theory of Change (Cont.) Outcome -Reduced the number of children infected with the intestinal worms -The increased awareness of the intestinal worms protections Output -The increased number of the children participate in the health education programme

  8. Theory of Change (Cont.) Impact -Improved hygienic conditions of the children

  9. Evaluation Question • Have the parents and children’s knowledge changed? • Do villagers support the programme? • Do the villagers’ awareness increased? • Are there other external factors affected the health programme intervention?

  10. Impact Evaluation Design • Survey design of infected children • Informing Analysis • Triangulation • Feedback to beneficiaries

  11. Management Structure Impact Evaluation Quality Assurance Regional Health Authority External Evaluators Internal Evaluators Local Health Authority Committee for Health Education Programme (local committee, CSO, ..) Feedback Feedback Head Health Education & Campaign Head Financial Support & Incentive

  12. Timeline for Impact Evaluation • 6 to 9 months

  13. Thank you…!

More Related