1 / 17

A move to a sustainable supply chain, a win for all. Hans Muilerman, Henriette Christensen,

A move to a sustainable supply chain, a win for all. Hans Muilerman, Henriette Christensen, PAN Europe www.pan-europe.info. Who we are & what we do. 32 not-for-profit members in 19 European countries Bring together mainly health, environmental & consumer organizations

nerita
Télécharger la présentation

A move to a sustainable supply chain, a win for all. Hans Muilerman, Henriette Christensen,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A move to a sustainable supply chain, a win for all. Hans Muilerman, Henriette Christensen, PAN Europewww.pan-europe.info

  2. Who we are & what we do • 32 not-for-profit members in 19 European countries • Bring together mainly health, environmental & consumer organizations • Working to replace use of hazardous pesticides with ecologically sound alternatives • Goal of productive + sustainable farming (IP), minimizing agrochemical inputs & adverse health & environmental impacts • Extended network in Brussels (Commission, Parliament, Council) where we successfully lobbied the pesticide package

  3. Food is pleasure and fun

  4. ……….. but what about reality?

  5. The PAN-Europe message to you is: • There is still a big gap between consumer expectations on food growing/food quality and the reality in the supply chain • We advise you to try to bridge this gap more (we see great opportunities); a real change is needed • Moving to a higher level of food sustainability could even be more profitable for all in the chain

  6. Examples of a real change can be observed in the market

  7. Reality (1), what about the environment ? (Eurostat 2006)

  8. Active substance Number of MRL’s lowered Maximum factor lowered MRL Methomyl 38 50 Methamidophos 3 50 Fenarimol 3 25 Oxydemeton-methyl 7 10 Pirimiphos-methyl 14 100 Procymidon 20 500 Carbendazim 8 5 Fenamiphos 11 5 Ethephon 4 100 Benfuracarb 5 10 Vinclozolin 30 800 Reality (2), actual MRL’s exceeding health standards (EFSA opinion 2008)

  9. Reality (3), low doses unsafe for the unborn (many scientific studies in literature) • Effect 1: Developmental neurotoxicity: Adverse effects for doses ranging from 0,05-1 ppm (cf. residue detection limit same range) Examples: Chlorpyriphos, Carbaryl, Diazinon, Aldicarb • Effect 2: Endocrine disruption: Adverse effects for doses ranging from 0,01-1 ppm (cf. residue detection limit same range) Examples: Quinalphos, Trifluralin, ETU/mancozeb • Effect 3: Combination toxicity: Adverse effects of ppm-range combined Examples: group Organophosphates, group Triazines, group Endocrine Disrupting chemicals.

  10. New rounds, new opportunities • EU decided in 2009 to a system-change in crop production to IPM (pesticide package) • EU-member states to implement this obligation in 2014 for every farmer through National Action Plans • Revision CAP-money: could it be connected to IP? • Global GAP discussing implementing IPM in the certification system • Many retailers adopt own policy on residues and supple chain management

  11. Supply chain analysis; topics for improvement Not feeling enough respected for their achievements or not paid enough FARMERS Professional skills not fully used (chain management, IP) TRADERS Stuck in a never ending price war and having only limited consumer trust RETAILERS Having the uncomfortable feeling not being in control of the food they are buying; worries about risks CONSUMERS

  12. PAN proposal • Move to a higher level of performance on IP (Global GAP+) and residues: no price competition with standard products anymore for those retailers choosing to use this higher level of performance; • Chain leader (retail) to send a clear message to other chain parties: real IP-products will be rewarded; • Best farmers and best traders for the job identified (dedicated IP-chain) • Communicate better products to the consumer (and earn more) • Joint lobby to connect CAP-money to real IP-farmers

  13. How we see this change happen • More consumer trust by more sustainable, healthy, residue-free and traceble/regional products • Premium products for a higher consumer price • Best & innovative retailers take the lead and design real IP-chains, offering IP-products • Reward and inspire IP-farmers (respect, pay more, CAP-money) • NGO’s could help convincing consumers

  14. On technics change needed: PHASE I: IP Step 7: use plant strenghteners IP ladder Example potatoes Global GAP + Step 4: use decision-support Step 3: resistant varieties Step 2: mechanical weeding Global GAP Step 1: wide crop rotation PHASE II: Residue control, best by prevention

  15. NGO’s could actually help on consumer trust

  16. Conclusion: • Change is possible: Better, healthier and more sustainable products can be put on the market • If we help convincing consumers choosing for real IP-products you could get a premium • More value for the complete supply chain (and more fun) • More trust from society on activities in the supply chain • Our CAP-campaign to connect Brussels legislation and money to a sustainable and healthy supply chain is useful for creating IP-chains

  17. Great opportunities out there, but ….. • Who takes the challenge? • (PAN-Europe is ready for it!)

More Related