1 / 5

JCTVC-I0343: Simplified absolute-3 coding method

JCTVC-I0343: Simplified absolute-3 coding method. Seung-Hwan Kim, Louis Kerofsky, Andrew Segall. 1. Absolute-3 coding in HM6.0. Absolute-3 coding Combination of adaptive truncated Golomb-Rice (G-R ) code and 0-th order Exponential Golomb (EG0) code

nevada-mcfarland
Télécharger la présentation

JCTVC-I0343: Simplified absolute-3 coding method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JCTVC-I0343: Simplified absolute-3 coding method Seung-Hwan Kim, Louis Kerofsky, Andrew Segall 1

  2. Absolute-3 coding in HM6.0 • Absolute-3 coding • Combination of adaptive truncated Golomb-Rice (G-R) code and 0-th order Exponential Golomb (EG0) code • Adaptive G-R code with rice parameter (cRiceParam) 0,1,2,3,and 4 • cRiceParam is updated as shown in the below table • G-R code range [7,14,26,46,78] • G-R code table size [9,16,28,48,80] bytes • EG0 code is employed when input value is larger than G-R code range 2

  3. Invention Simplified absolute-3 coding structure • Simplified absolute-3 coding • 1) If cRiceParam >3, G-R coding is skipped and EG0 is replaced by EG4 • 2) 44.2% memory savings for G-R code Proposed Method HM6.0

  4. Results • Implemented the proposed method into HM 6.0 • Test 1: common test condition (QP=22,27,32,37) • Test 2: low QP test condition (QP=1,5,9,13) • Class F: -1.56 %(AI_Main), -0.88(AI_HE10) • -0.88% (RA_Main), -0.48(RA_HE10) • -0.33%(LA_Main), -0.20 (LA_HE10) 4

  5. Conclusion • Reduce the memory requirement for G-R code • Eliminating rice parameter 4 Table • Reduced by 44.2% • Simplified coding structure • Employing only EG4 when cRiceParam ==4 • Coding performance • No changes in common test condition and negligible changes in low QP • Significant coding gain (-1.56% for AI_Main) for Class F 5

More Related