1 / 15

Property rights & resource management

Property rights & resource management. ASPO conference 2003, Paris Dr Paul E. Metz INTEGeR… consult, NL . The equitable allocation – per capita equal – of environmental user rights. a conditio–sine–qua–non for fairness, human rights and sustainable globalisation

newman
Télécharger la présentation

Property rights & resource management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Property rights &resource management ASPO conference 2003, Paris Dr Paul E. Metz INTEGeR… consult, NL

  2. The equitable allocation – per capita equal – of environmental user rights a conditio–sine–qua–non for fairness, human rights and sustainable globalisation creates ownership, which brings stewardship and a self-interest to conserve this capital

  3. The 3 economic factors • Natural capital Nature Planet • Human capital Labour People • Financial capital Money Profit Scarcity ->prices ->substitution INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  4. Who owns Nature ? • Theocracy – God, but who takes care ? • Feudalism – the King or Sheik • Oligarchy – an Elite of friends of King • Socialism – States on behalf of citizens • Liberalism – Citizens have equal rights Best fit for democracy & free market ? INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  5. Natural capital • Natural resources • Finite reserves, stocks, ‘trees’ • Traditional ‘hard’ commodities – tonnes • Environmental resources • Renewable flows, harvests, ‘fruits’ • New ‘soft’ commodities – certificates, money-like INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  6. Oil and air comparable ? • O I L • geography, sovereignty simple • global common NO (oceans ?) • A I R • Chief Seattle: How can man own the air ? • global common YES • AIR = supranational natural resource – UN role INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  7. How to control environmental resources • Ethics – “voluntarily”, “Type 2 partnerships” • Legal regulation – legal standards • Fiscal regulation – greentaxes for State • Resource trade regulation – cap on use, allocate/auction/give & traderesource/emission allowances – benefits … ? INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  8. Origin of financial capital • Savings from income - earn enough ? • Heritage - “grandfathering” • Loan from friends - rich friends ? • Loan from a bank - have collateral ? INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  9. “Alternative” collaterals • Thomas Paine 1700 society • social rent – basic income • Henry George 1900 collective land • land rent – basic income • Amartya Sen 1980 society • community - non-income social benefits • Mohamed Yunus 1980 social group • micro credit - loans for “have-nots” – temporary • Governor of Alaska 1980 oil & gas rights • Permanent Fund - annual cheque for each citizen – forever • Hernando de Souza 1990 individual land rights • ‘normal’ credit - new land titles • Anil Agarwal c.s. 1990 user rights of nature • - Earth dividend - for each citizen – forever – worldwide INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  10. Creation of Wealth • Citizens need access to capital • Collateral needed ? Natural resources ! • Spreads capitalism democratically : Bush “the oil belongs to the people of Iraq” • Kyoto until 2012 : grandfathered emission quota –> without Dev Countries - USA out • Kyoto after 2012 : equity-based, attracts Dev Countries -> USA will follow .... INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  11. Earth Dividend • Only states canorganise “the economy” • Privatise exploitationglobal commons within sustainable, dynamic limits • Private companies compete on ‘good’ efficiency, not on ‘bad’ speculation • All citizens areshareholders – cannot sell their share, but are free to go to best buyer for their annual ‘coupon’ INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  12. Benefits of Earth Dividend • Allocated rights : self-interest to protect • Applies thePolluter Pays Principle • Makes emission trade a ‘fair’ trade • Rewards non-pollution with income • Is instrument for Sustainable Globalisation • Less-corrupt growth“bottom-up” in SMEs • Compatible withfree market & democracy & decolonisation – ends “climate slavery” INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  13. What does it mean ? • IPCC-climate vs.IEA & ASPO scenario’s  • 2 billion non-emitting poor ( ‘no access’ ) • each 2 ton Co2-eq @ euro 5,- ( no USA) = 20 billion euro/yr additional ‘ODA’ • ditto, with USA @ euro 10,- : 40 billion • 10 or 20 euro /year /capita extrafor investment in emission-free machines • CO2 is only a start, the first ‘common’ INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  14. Research agenda • Involvemainstreameconomists • Ethics & political economics ! • Price formation ofpublic goods • Analyse AlaskaPermanent Fund Basic Income, Socio-Eco Tax Reform, Tobin Taxvs ‘charity’ social security INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

  15. Contact Dr Paul E. Metz INTEGeR… consult, NL Projects “Entrepreneurs for Equity” “Make emission trade a FAIR trade” metz@integerconsult.org www.integerconsult.org INTEGeR... consult - for ASPO - May 2003 Paris

More Related