1 / 54

Highway Information Seminar

Highway Information Seminar. Motor Fuel Session November 16, 2004. The Big Picture. FHWA determines how much federal Highway Trust Fund tax money comes from each State Compared to how much each State receives from FHWA Derives a “for every dollar in, how much does my State receive” ratio.

nida
Télécharger la présentation

Highway Information Seminar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Highway Information Seminar Motor Fuel Session November 16, 2004

  2. The Big Picture • FHWA determines how much federal Highway Trust Fund tax money comes from each State • Compared to how much each State receives from FHWA • Derives a “for every dollar in, how much does my State receive” ratio

  3. The Big Picture II • This analysis is extremely important: • To Congress • FHWA • States • It’s important that the data be correct

  4. Background • Uses of State motor fuel data • Federal-aid highway funds Apportionment • Federal motor fuel Attribution • Importance • 20 years ago, historical records • Today, drives the distribution of significant federal funds • Tomorrow, indications are the data will remain significant

  5. Apportionments • Funds for several FHWA programs are apportioned to the States: • Formula based • Set by law • About 85 % of Federal highway funds are apportioned • Under TEA-21, about $12 billion (40% of Federal Highway Programs) was annually apportioned based on motor fuel data

  6. Apportionment and MotorFuel Data

  7. The Attribution Process • FHWA attribution supports the apportionment process • How FHWA calculates attribution • The role of State data

  8. How Attribution Works I State-by-State contributions to the Federal Highway Trust Fund are not available from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

  9. How Attribution Works II • Typical federal motor fuel taxpayer is an oil company or oil wholesaler • 8,000 are licensed with IRS • Federal tax is imposed as the fuel crosses the rack • Where is the fuel consumed? • IRS didn’t know, but has begun to address fuel tracking

  10. How Attribution Works III • IRS reports tax receipts for each motor fuel tax type • HTF contributions from highway users in each State are estimated using State motor fuel data • States report the motor fuel taxed under each State’s procedures • FHWA uses established procedures to derive a consistent, compatible dataset for attribution

  11. How Attribution Works IV • Measure on-highway gallons of motor fuel (Gasoline - Gasohol - Special fuels) • Sum to derive the national total (by type) • Derive each State’s share of the national total • Use those shares to determine revenue shares

  12. How Attribution Works V • For the federal truck taxes: • Tire tax • Truck and trailer retail sales excise tax • Heavy vehicle use tax • Attribution to each State is in proportion to the highway use of special fuels

  13. Attribution and Data Quality • FHWA’s goal is an accurate data-set with which to determine attribution • To improve data quality, FHWA needs to work with State data providers to achieve accurate reporting

  14. In Summary • Processes: • Apportionment process • Attribution process • Importance: • Measurement of motor fuel data • Equitable treatment for all States • FHWA needs your commitment

  15. FHWA Motor Fuel Reporting: Accomplishments Challenges Changing Environment

  16. Accomplishments: • Re-Assessment • Input procedures • Motor fuel reviews • Data verification • Outreach

  17. Accomplished: Re-Assessment • Time line • Began in late 1998 • Shortly after TEA-21 passed • Methodology • Expert advisory group • Identify issues • Propose solutions

  18. Accomplished: Re-Assessment • General Accounting Office (GAO) • Concurrent assessment • Cooperative effort • Substantial agreement on conclusions • GAO identified several actions • Review & verify State MF reporting • Document FHWA attribution methodology • Independent review of FHWA methodology • Evaluate EXSTARS-EXFIRS for validation

  19. Accomplished: Re-Assessment • FHWA identified areas for further study/revision • Federal Register Notice • General support for the proposals • Publication: Attribution and Apportionment of Federal Highway Tax Revenues: Process Refinements

  20. Accomplished: Input Procedures • Implemented a submittal process • All motor fuel data since January 2002 • Generally considered easy-to-use • Computer security requirements • Secure submittal site • Required change to Input Tool use • Data providers received USERID • Managed by Division Offices

  21. Accomplished: MF Reviews • Division Office reviews • Continuous Process Improvement Model • 45 States have done reviews • Quality varies

  22. Accomplished: Data verification • Process review versus data verification • Why verify? • Old procedure - data hand-entered • Data needs checking until new procedures • Verification memo • Sent in March – June each year • Typically, several States revise their data • So several iterations occur

  23. Accomplished: Publications • Attribution and Apportionment of Federal Highway Tax Revenues: Process Refinements • Your State’s Share: Attributing Federal Highway Revenues to Each State • Guide to Reporting Highway Statistics has been revised and approved by OMB

  24. Accomplished: Revised Guide to Reporting Highway Statistics • Data requirements have changed • Data providers need to be aware of these changes • It will require some effort on the State’s part to be aware and make these changes • FHWA will discuss these with you at any time, if you need assistance

  25. Challenges: Motor fuel reviews and follow-up • Quality of reviews • Quality improvements • Risk assessment • Verification of data • Communication

  26. Challenges: MF Reviews • Quality of reviews/Quality improvements • Need to bring up the average • Three core items: • Procedures document • Procedures assessment • Oversight plan • Risk assessment

  27. Challenges: Communication • Goal: Keep stakeholders in loop • Methods • Workshop-Video conference options • November workshops on Highway Statistics • January-February motor fuel workshops • Special request/event video conferences

  28. Challenges: Verification of Data • About 20 are reviewing the data • Apparently, about 30 are not reviewing the data • It’s the States last chance to make sure what they reported is correct

  29. Challenges: Communication II • Methods (continued) • Community of Practice: • Location for all publications/materials • Bulletin-board style listserv • http://knowledge.fhwa.dot.gov/cops/hcx.nsf/home?openformgroup=motor%20 fuel%20reporting/htf%20attribution

  30. Changing Environment: • Reauthorization • Reporting changes • Attribution analysis changes • Gasohol data • Federal law changes combating tax evasion

  31. Changing Environment: Reauthorization • TEA-21 ended September 30, 2003 • Administration-proposed legislation • 8 month extension until May, 2005 • What Congress will do is unknown • No significant MF changes expected

  32. Changing Environment:Reporting & Analysis Changes • FHWA will be treating some data differently • On-highway public diesel use • Alternative fuels reporting • Loss allowance treatment • Reporting changes • Computer security • Data uniformity • State responsibilities

  33. Changing Environment:Gasohol Revenue • Hot topic in reauthorization • American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 • Highway Trust Fund compensated for gasohol subsidy • How this will be treated administratively is still to be determined • Will mean increased revenue to the Trust Fund

  34. Changing Environment:Fuel Tax Evasion • Federal law changes • Mobile machinery • Aviation grade kerosene • Dye injection equipment • Intercity buses • Pipeline/vessel registration • Other administrative changes • Contact: Linda Morris at FHWA

  35. In Summary • Identified and discussed • Accomplishments • Challenges • Changes in the MF environment

  36. FHWA Motor Fuel Reporting: Data Submittal Process Discussion of Improvements

  37. Background I • 2002 and beyond motor fuel data submitted electronically • Submitted by State DOT’s, DOR’s, or FHWA • Form 551M submitted monthly • Form 556 submitted annually

  38. Background - II • Reported using Smart Input Tool • Submitted using • Spreadsheet view • Wizard view • Direct XML • Instructions for reporting – Guide to Reporting Highway Statistics – Chapter 2

  39. Motor Fuel Reporting • We begin here……..

  40. Motor Fuel Reporting • Gallons from tax returns of seller • Depending on point of taxation in State: • Terminal Holders • Wholesalers • Retailers

  41. Motor Fuel Reporting • Gasoline and Gasohol Gross Volume Reported Includes: • Fully taxed • Exempt sales • Fully refunded sales • Partially exempted sales • Partially refunded sales • Taxed at reduced rates • Assessments

  42. Motor Fuel Reporting • Diesel and LPG Gross Volume Reported Includes: • Only Highway Use of Diesel and LPG • Include Public Use Diesel • Revised Chapter 2 of Guide – March 2003

  43. Motor Fuel Reporting • Other State Fuel Data • Alternative fuels • Per gallon equivalent • Registration fees in lieu of per gallon taxes • Aviation Fuels • Transit Fuels

  44. Motor Fuel Reporting • Consistency in Data Entries • Enter text and data on same line each month • New text and data - Identify the entry in the comments section on page 2

  45. Motor Fuel Reporting • New Feature in DBMS • Data that is incorrectly submitted will be rejected • State will be notified that their submittal has been rejected and comments to explain why

More Related