1 / 24

Investigation of Risk Behaviors: Athletes vs. Non-Athletes

Investigation of Risk Behaviors: Athletes vs. Non-Athletes . Katie Brain, Emma Dewart, Alex Trocino, & AJ McConville . What the literature says…. Athletes participation in alcohol consumption and sexual behaviors is higher than their non-athlete counterparts (Brenner & Swanik, 2007)

nijole
Télécharger la présentation

Investigation of Risk Behaviors: Athletes vs. Non-Athletes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Investigation of Risk Behaviors: Athletes vs. Non-Athletes Katie Brain, Emma Dewart, Alex Trocino, & AJ McConville

  2. What the literature says… • Athletes participation in alcohol consumption and sexual behaviors is higher than their non-athlete counterparts (Brenner & Swanik, 2007) • Out-of-season athletes had a higher rate of drinking and substance abuse than athletes in-season (Brenner & Swanik, 2007). • Athletes at a higher risk of substance use because of increased physical demands of athletics as well as increased stress and time constraints of dual student-athlete role (Yusko, Buckman, White, & Pandina, 2008)

  3. Literature Review Continued… • Males consumption of alcohol, substance abuse, and sexual behavior has a higher frequency than females (Suruhlal, Nolan, & Ubane, 2012);(Hildebrand, Johnson, & Bogle, 2001);(Ford, 2008) • Due to alcohol consumption athletes have a higher rate of risky behaviors which include an increase in sexual partners, decrease in contraception use, increase in fights, and increase in drinking and driving (Grossbard, Lee, Neighbors, Hendershot, & Larimer, 2007) • Athletes in contact sports have greater quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption than those in non-contact sports(Brenner & Swanik, 2007)

  4. Rationale • Conflicting findings in prior research (Yusko et al., 2008); (Martens, Dams-O’Connor, Duffy-Paiement, & Gibson, 2006) • Differences in risk behaviors between in-season and out-of-season athletes (Brenner & Swanik, 2007) • Misconception of risk behaviors of athlete due to their participation in athletics (Green, Uryasz, Petr, & Bray, 2001) • Lack of studies and findings on substance abuse and risky sexual behavior of college athletes (Yusko et al., 2008) • Lack of results for athletes outside of Division I athletics (Brenner & Swanik, 2007)

  5. Research Question • Is there a difference between students who are varsity athletes and students who are non-athletes in participation of risk behaviors such as drinking, substance abuse, and sexual patterns? • IV: Participation in athletics • DV: Risk behaviors

  6. Methodology • Selection of subjects • Instrument used • Procedure • Design & Analysis

  7. Subjects • Undergraduate varsity collegiate athletes and non-athletes • Private Division III college • At least 18 years old

  8. Selection of Subjects • Convenience sample • Gathered through specific sports teams or through contact in dining halls/pub • Team meetings/practice/lifting time - athletes • Lunch hour – non-athletes

  9. Instrument • National College Health Association National College Health Assessment (ACHANCHAII) • Questions included: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sexual behavior and contraception, demographics • Reliability factors are unknown

  10. Procedure • 1. Recruited subjects • 2. Signing of informed consent • 3. Subjects completed survey • 4. Surveys were collected and analyzed after course of two weeks • Results and conclusions were developed

  11. Design & Analysis • Discriminate analysis

  12. What we found… • Significance for a five different variables included in our study (p<.05): • Use of tobacco from water pipe (hookah) • 5 or more drinks in 1 sitting in last 2 weeks • Had oral sex in the last 30 days • Had vaginal intercourse in the last 30 days • Used a condom or barrier during vaginal intercourse in the last 30 days

  13. We calculated an effect size of 18% (r2 = .1806)Eigenvalues: Canonical Correlation = .425

  14. Results

  15. Results Continued…

  16. Results Continued…

  17. Results Continued…

  18. Results Continued…

  19. Discussion • Results did not indicate that participation in risky behaviors predicated membership to either group • Non-athletes and athletes reported similar habits for use of drugs, drinking and engaging in risky sexual behaviors • Results support previous research, with the exception of alcohol use • Typically, athletes are thought to drink more often than non-athletes, with little research indicating that they are more likely to engage in either risky sexual behaviors or drug use • Our study did not find that individuals who drink more are more likely to be athletes

  20. Limitations • Limited sample size • Disproportionate amount of females, freshmen and sophomore responses • Only two athletic teams were utilized • Data collection sites may not have taken into consideration length of survey and risky subject matter • Use of dining halls and team meetings may have prevented respondents from truthfully reporting – attention and privacy compromised • Future studies may want to investigate different social groups and other influences considering the ambiguity of this subject

  21. References • Brenner, J & Swanik, K. (2007). High-risk drinking characteristics in collegiate athletes. Journal of American College Health, 56, 267-272. • Ford, J. A. (2008). Alcohol use among college students: A comparison of athletes and nonathletes. Substance Use & Misuse, 42, 1367-1377. • Ford, J. A. (2008). Nonmedical prescription drug use among college students: A comparison between athletes and nonathletes. Journal Of American College Health, 57, 211-220. • Green, G.A., Uryasz, F.D, Petr, T.A., & Bray, C.D. (2001). NCAA study of substance use and abuse habits of college student-athletes. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 11, 51-56. • Grossbard, J.R., Lee, C.M., Neighbors, C., Hendershot, C.S., & Larimer, M.E. (2007). Alcohol and risky sex in athletes and nonathletes: What roles do sex motives play? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 566-574. • Grossbard, J., Hummer, J., LaBrie, J., Pederson, E., & Neighbors, C. (2009). Is substance use a team sport? Attraction to team, perceived norms, and alcohol and marijuana use among male and female intercollegiate athletes. Journal Of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 247-261. • Hildebrand, K. M., Johnson, D. J., & Bogle, K. K. (2001). Comparison of patterns of alcohol use between high school and college athletes and non-athletes. College Student Journal, 35, 358-365. • Martens, M.P., Dams-O’Connor, K., Duffy-Paiement, C., & Gibson, J.T. (2006). Perceived alcohol use among friends and alcohol consumption among college athletes. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 178-184. • Martens, M.P., Cox, R.H., & Beck, N.C. (2003). Negative consequences of intercollegiate athlete drinking: The role of drinking motives. Journal of Studieson Alcohol, 64, 825-828. • Surujlal, J., Nolan, V. T., & Ubane, T. (2012). Drinking patterns and related consequences among university student-athletes. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 18, 281- 292. • Yusko, D.A., Buckman, J.F., White, H.R., & Pandina, R.J. (2008). Alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and performance enhancers: A comparison of use by college student athletes and nonathletes. Journal of American College Health, 57, 281-289.

More Related