1 / 15

SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) INTEGRA (Slovakia): towards a new partnership ?

Seminar “Strengthening Development Cooperation in Enlarged Europe” Luxembourg - 9 & 10 December 2004. SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) INTEGRA (Slovakia): towards a new partnership ? A collaboration initiative between two NGO’s. Contents. Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA

nijole
Télécharger la présentation

SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) INTEGRA (Slovakia): towards a new partnership ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seminar“Strengthening Development Cooperationin Enlarged Europe” Luxembourg - 9 & 10 December 2004 SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) INTEGRA (Slovakia): towards a new partnership ? A collaboration initiative between two NGO’s

  2. Contents • Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA • Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s • Context for the collaboration • Building up of the partnership • The common project • Added value and limits of the partnership • Conclusions and discussion

  3. Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA I. SOS FAIM • Independent and professional • Long term development in Africa • Three priorities: • Developing peasants organization • Supporting microfinance institutions • Public information in Luxembourg

  4. Presentation of SOS FAIM and INTEGRA II. INTEGRA • “Helping people to build their businesses to become « Islands of Integrity » and participate in the transformation of their communities” • Three Strategic Programs: - Social Enterprise Program - Micro-Enterpirse Development Program for Women - Corporate Social Responsibility Program • 10 years of development experience in Eastern Europe • Starting to operate in Africa

  5. Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s • Common aspects • Professional • Similar views on Microfinance • Strong positions in their own countries • Open to new collaborations

  6. Common aspects and differences of the 2 NGO’s II. Differences • Confessional / non confessional • Different uses of the microfinance tool • Different geographical priorities • Human and financial resources

  7. Context of the collaboration • New Member States (NMS) = new donors • Political will of EC to support NMS NGO’s • SOS FAIM & INTEGRA: open-minded NGO’s

  8. Building up the partnership • Initiative of SOS FAIM • Identification of NMS NGO’s (Internet, TRIALOG, etc…) • Trip in Czech Republic & Slovakia (May ’04) (Meeting with MFA, UNDP, NGOs, embassies and universities)

  9. Building up the partnership Conclusions of the first mission: • Easier context in Slovakia than in Czech Republic • Different geographical priorities • Small NGO’s need institutional support

  10. Building up the partnership • Identification of INTEGRA as a possible partner • Identification of a joint project • Second mission in Slovakia (August ’04) • Redaction of the project • Application to EC (B-21-02-03)

  11. The common project:‘Microfinance: let beneficiaries speak’ • Development education project • Focus on the microfinance beneficiaries • Human approach (rather than a technical one) • To schools & universities, corporations, NGO’s • National campaign in the two countries • 3 years time span (2006-2008)

  12. Added value and limits of the partnership • Added value • New partnership = new ideas • Geographical crossroads approach • Common understanding between 2 NGO’s • Similar needs in the two countries • Learning from each other

  13. Added value and limits of the partnership II. Limits • Small NGO’s: limited human & financial resources • A new partnership : needs to be consolidated • Language issues • Distance between the two countries • Dependence on public funding

  14. Conclusions and discussion Conclusions: • New and still “theoretical” partnership • Building up a partnership requires time • IMPORTANCE TO MEET PEOPLE (institutional relationships = first human ones !) • Starting a new partnership = a great challenge !

  15. Conclusions and discussion Discussion (proposal …): Western NGO’s / NMS NGO’s : a fair partnership or a new business ? THANK YOU ! Thierry DEFENSE, SOS FAIM (Luxembourg) Marek MARKUS, INTEGRA (Slovakia)

More Related