1 / 13

Ch 4: Personality and Abilities

Ch 4: Personality and Abilities. Part 1 – Feb. 5, 2009. Personality. Unique and stable pattern of behaviors, thoughts, emotions Interactionist approach – behavior result of personality and situation When does it have the most influence? How is personality measured? Objective –

nikkos
Télécharger la présentation

Ch 4: Personality and Abilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ch 4: Personality and Abilities Part 1 – Feb. 5, 2009

  2. Personality • Unique and stable pattern of behaviors, thoughts, emotions • Interactionist approach – behavior result of personality and situation • When does it have the most influence? • How is personality measured? • Objective – • Projective –

  3. Controversy: Personality in Selection • 3 points – historically, conventional wisdom in psych was that personality measures… • 1) • 2) • 3) • What is the current view of personality in the I/O literature?

  4. Taxonomies • Terminological confusion abounds! • 1 answer is Big 5 model • Many researchers agree most measures assess at least the “Big 5” • Check to make sure you assess these 5 reliably, validly… • Anything extra is optional • Accepted Big 5 measure is “NEO”

  5. Big 5 Model • 5 key dimensions of personality (know def of each…) • Openness to Experience – • Conscientiousness – • Extraversion – • Agreeableness – • Neuroticism (or its opposite, positively-termed “emotional stability”) –

  6. Does personality predict job performance? • As recently as ’90, most said ‘no’ • Barrick & Mount (1991) • What did this study suggest? • Later studies found C & A predict job perf about as well as what other construct? • (correlation range?)

  7. Cont.. • Conscientiousness most highly related to job performance (of the Big 5 dimensions) • related to …? • But jobs where this isn’t good? And why?

  8. Faking personality scores • What is the controversy? • Hogan & Hogan’s view: (they publish the HPI) • Some items are transparent & easy to fake, is this a problem? • How can methodology be used to assess faking? • How do corrections for faking affect validity? • Their conclusion?

  9. Levin & Zickar (2002) “Self-presentation, lies, and bullshit” • What is their issue with the Hogans’ conclusions? • Levin & Zickar distinctions: • Field studies compared those instructed to fake w/those instructed to be honest: • What did they find?

  10. Other Personality Constructs • Positive/Negative Affectivity (PA/NA) – stable mood • Strong relationship with job satisfaction • Is there such a construct as group affect (or affective tone?) • How could we measure this?

  11. Abilities • Capacity to perform a task • Intellectual abilities • Cognitive ability (g): general intelligence, reasoning • Traditionally most importance placed on this (IQ tests) • Highly related to job perf • Practical Intelligence – devise effective ways to get things done

  12. Will ‘g’ & conscientiousness do the job? • Focus on precise matching of applicant abilities w/those required by job? • Or focus on conscientiousness & ‘g’? • Distinguish between dependent variables used in studies • In past, focused on ? • Current focus shifting to ? • Final choice of which to use may depend on…

  13. When to focus on g & cons. • Focus on g & cons when… • 1) • 2) • 3) • Otherwise focus on precise matching of skills with job

More Related