1 / 14

Eurocall Conference Granada September 4-7, 2006

Eurocall Conference Granada September 4-7, 2006 Large scale implementation of blended language learning environments (BLLE) Alessandra Corda, Petra Heck Universiteit Leiden / Tilburg University. General background

nikkos
Télécharger la présentation

Eurocall Conference Granada September 4-7, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Eurocall Conference • Granada • September 4-7, 2006 • Large scale implementation of blended language learning environments • (BLLE) • Alessandra Corda, Petra Heck • Universiteit Leiden / Tilburg University

  2. General background • English: language of instruction in almost all MA courses in the Netherlands (from 2006-2007) • English competence level Dutch students: C1 receptive skills, B1 productive skills • International students: generally lower level • Great demand for academic English courses (both students and staff) • focus on speaking and writing • need for differentiation

  3. The INTUIT project (I) • 1-1-2006 - 31-12-2007 • 6 university language centres • Development of an ICT enriched learning environment to support English for academic purposes • No distance learning, blended learning • Target group: 10,000 students every year • 2006: 12 pilot projects, 2007: large scale implementation

  4. The INTUIT project (II) • Pedagogical aims: implementation Common European Framework and autonomous language learning • Pilots: • Diagnostic testing (Dialang and Set 10) • Language practice (Ellips and Academic Word List) • Guidance (web based language portfolio) • Blackboard

  5. Success and failure factors • Implementation BLLE influenced by: • Relation between computer-supported and non computer-supported activities • Teacher professional development • Technical constraints

  6. Relation between computer-supported and non-computer supported activities • On the basis of which factors do teachers decide which activities should be supported by the computer?

  7. Computer-supported vs non computer supported activities • Added value computer: • “tutor” function (interactive exercises; focus on receptive skills) • test function • organizational function (teacher centered: Blackboard) • But: focus on productive skills  added value computer: • “tool” function (support for speaking skills) • portfolio function (student centered)

  8. Relation between computer-supported and non-computer supported activities • Which computer-supported activities are perceived to be most effective by teachers and students, and why?

  9. Grammar • diagnostic interactive tests (Blackboard); • on the basis of the results students are advised to do specific interactive exercises (Ellips) • Why? Differentiation; more efficient use of contact hours. Remedial teaching. • Speaking skills: • self assessment through can-do statements portfolio with recorded monologues • self reflection, feedback • Why? Differentiation; stimulating autonomous learning and self reflection

  10. Relation between computer-supported and non-computer supported activities • For which functions is the computer now mostly used and why?

  11. Use of ICT at the start of the project • 2 Language Centers (LC): only links • 2 LC: tests (QPT, Dialang), digital language lab • 2 LC: Blackboard, interactive exercise (1 LC: also digital language lab)

  12. For which functions is the computer now mostly used and why? • Placement and diagnostic testing (also web based: SET 10, Dialang) • Digital language labs; Blackboard; interactive exercises • Language portfolio • Why? • time saving • efficiency

  13. Conclusion • New pedagogy under construction …

  14. Contact • a.corda@let.leidenuniv.nl • p.a.m.heck@uvt.nl

More Related