1 / 9

UNIDIMENSIONALITY – MULTIDIMENSIONALITY (An example)

UNIDIMENSIONALITY – MULTIDIMENSIONALITY (An example). Panayiotis Panayides. Rules of thumb for the existence of a second dimension. In the unexplained variance a secondary dimension must have the strength of at least 3 items.

nina-barlow
Télécharger la présentation

UNIDIMENSIONALITY – MULTIDIMENSIONALITY (An example)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UNIDIMENSIONALITY – MULTIDIMENSIONALITY (An example) Panayiotis Panayides

  2. Rules of thumb for the existence of a second dimension • In the unexplained variance a secondary dimension must have the • strength of at least 3 items. • Eigenvalue < 3 (in a reasonable length test) then the test is probably • unidimensional. (Linacre, 2005) • 2. The first factor must explain a significant % of the unexplained variance • (more than 20%) • A significant % of the total variance in the data • (Linacre, 2005, eigenvalue 2.7, N = 14, 0.2% of total variance) Example: Maths (27) and Language (28) diagnostic tests

  3. PCA of raw scores

  4. x + x = ……….. x.x = ……..

  5. PCA of standardised residuals(Linacre, 1998)

  6. Test – 51 items Test – 55 items Person Reliability : 0.90 Person separation: 3.05 Strata : 4.4 Person Reliability : 0.92 Person separation: 3.38 Strata : 4.84

  7. Given • the small % of unexplained variance (7.5%) explained by the first contrast • the small % of Total variance (3.7%) explained by the first contrast • the variance explained by the second dimension is about 14 times smaller • than the variance explained by the dimension measured by the test • the closeness of the points to a straight line passing through the origin • the extremely high correlation (r = 0.994) between the person measures • the fact that the two tests were on different subjects but were very easy Unidimensional

More Related