1 / 24

FandPnet

www.FandPnet.com. Baltimore Easton Hagerstown Herndon Tampa Wilmington. Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Disciplining Your Problem Employees Albert B. Randall, Jr., Esq. Quality Representation, Personal Service. Handbooks. Drafting – HR Manager or Atty.? Cost-benefit analysis

nitesh
Télécharger la présentation

FandPnet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. www.FandPnet.com Baltimore Easton Hagerstown Herndon Tampa Wilmington Breaking Up is Hard to Do:Disciplining Your Problem Employees Albert B. Randall, Jr., Esq. Quality Representation, Personal Service

  2. Handbooks • Drafting – HR Manager or Atty.? • Cost-benefit analysis • HR Manager should draft policy • Atty. should review for legal compliance • Pre-written policies (one size does NOT fit all) • Plain language approach – NO LEGALESE!! Quality Representation, Personal Service

  3. At-will Employment • Maryland standard • May terminate employee for any reason • Non-contract employees • Termination may not violate public policy (Adler) • Employers should have at-will disclaimer • Handbook or • Stand alone policy Quality Representation, Personal Service

  4. At-Will Disclaimers • Handbook may be found to be employment contract w/o disclaimer (may form implied contract) • Cover page in handbook • Large, bold typeface, conspicuous • Acknowledgement of receipt by employee • Sample language: • “This handbook contains the complete agreement between the company and its employees. Nothing in this handbook should be interpreted as a contract of employment. Either the company or you may terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason.” Quality Representation, Personal Service

  5. Drafting Policies • Generally, employers are free to draft any personnel policy relevant to its business/workforce • No-no’s • Those prohibited by statute or case law • Those that conflict with a contract (CBA or NLRA) • Those that jeopardize health or safety of workforce • Those that conflict with public policy • Yes-yes’s • EEO policy • FMLA policy Quality Representation, Personal Service

  6. Drafting Policies (cont.) • Overly broad • Sweeping statements in an effort to regulate as much as possible • Language is often vague • Often contain unenforceable provisions • Overly narrow • Extreme regulation of employee conduct • Impossible to cover everything • May have negative psychological impact Quality Representation, Personal Service

  7. Drafting Policies (cont.) • Better to draft “happy medium” policies • Ensure that policies are legally enforceable • Equally importantly, ensure that the policies are practically and uniformly enforced • Need to allow discretion • Ensure that front-line managers and supervisors are trained on policies and are held accountable for their implementation Quality Representation, Personal Service

  8. Policies to Consider • FMLA (required) • EEO (required) • At-will disclaimer • Employee privacy/emails • Leave (sick, vacation, personal, military, jury, bereavement) • Disciplinary • Workplace violence • Substance abuse Quality Representation, Personal Service

  9. Policies to Consider • No-solicitation • OSHA/safety policies • Employee codes of conduct/dress • Benefits (COBRA, etc.) • Off-duty/moonlighting • Arbitration of employment disputes • Jury Trial Waivers/Venue Provisions Quality Representation, Personal Service

  10. Hiring Practices • No unintended promises • Recruiting • Employment applications • Offer letters • No discriminatory questions • Disability, gender, national origin, religion • Up-to-date Job descriptions Quality Representation, Personal Service

  11. Discipline • Three types: • Zero tolerance • Progressive • Hidden/reactionary Quality Representation, Personal Service

  12. Progressive Discipline • Publish the policy • Informs employee of expectations • Draft policy so that it does not contractually bind employer • Be wary of “shalls”, “wills”, “musts” • Permit discretion • Remind of “at-will” employment in discipline policy • Be intentionally vague in terms of discipline for various offenses Quality Representation, Personal Service

  13. Documentation • Do supervisors maintain incident logs? • Have verbal warnings been documented/retained in personnel files? • Are copies of written warnings retained? Quality Representation, Personal Service

  14. Documentation (cont.) • Verbal warning • Employee/supervisor’s name & date of warning • Reason for warning • Opportunity for employee to respond • Corrective measures • Statement that failure to correct will result in more serious discipline, including up to termination Quality Representation, Personal Service

  15. Documentation (cont.) • Written warning • Signed acknowledgement/date from employee • Signed/dated by supervisor • Include acknowledgment from employee that the failure to undertake corrective measures will result in more severe discipline • If employee refuses to sign, supervisor should note Quality Representation, Personal Service

  16. Performance Appraisals • Do they match the employee’s performance? • If not, may be difficult to discipline/terminate/prevail in litigation Quality Representation, Personal Service

  17. Do You Investigate? • Does law require investigation? • Is there a contractual obligation to investigate? • Concerns for future liability? Quality Representation, Personal Service

  18. Choosing the Investigator • Match the investigator to the situation • Consider training and qualifications • Consider nature of allegations • Consider second investigator for corroboration Quality Representation, Personal Service

  19. Principles Underlying Investigations • Fairness • Notice to accused • Opportunity to respond • Fundamental fairness • Does the result pass the “smell test?” Quality Representation, Personal Service

  20. Gathering Information • Consider all records, voicemail, e-mail, telephone records, computer records, photographs and security videotapes • Preserve originals • Interview witnesses • Maintain impartiality • Preserve confidentiality • Focused questioning Quality Representation, Personal Service

  21. Making the Decision • Consider suspending pending investigation before immediately terminating • Have you interviewed all witnesses, including accused and those witnesses identified by accused? • Have you followed the policy? • Have you acted fairly/non-discriminatorily? • Have you documented everything? • Do you have a witness at the termination meeting? Quality Representation, Personal Service

  22. Documenting the Decision • Equally important as documenting the investigation • Helps establish rationale behind decision Quality Representation, Personal Service

  23. Guarding Against Retaliation Claims • Retaliation claims fastest growing EEOC claim • Need to advise Complainants and other participants of no tolerance for retaliation • Follow up to ensure that no retaliation has taken place Quality Representation, Personal Service

  24. Questions? Albert (“Bert”) B. Randall, Jr., Esq. Franklin & Prokopik The B&O Building 2 N. Charles Street, Suite 600 Baltimore, MD 21201 (410) 230-3622 ARandall@FandPnet.com www.FandPnet.com Baltimore MD u Easton MD u Hagerstown MD u Herndon VA u Tampa FL u Wilmington DE Quality Representation, Personal Service

More Related