1 / 9

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS. Building Blocks. WP-EFF MANDATE. By June 2012, WP-EFF to agree on: “light working arrangements ” for the Global Partnership on Effective Development Co-operation (art 36b)

nituna
Télécharger la présentation

HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HLF-4: SHARED PRINCIPLES AND DIFFERENTIATED COMMITMENTS

  2. Building Blocks

  3. WP-EFF MANDATE By June 2012, WP-EFF to agree on: • “light working arrangements” for the Global Partnership on Effective Development Co-operation (art 36b) • global-level indicators and process for monitoring Busan agreement (art 35b) WP-EFF to be prepared by the Post Busan Interim Group (PBIG)

  4. TIMELINE Initial consultation Elaboration detailed proposal Finalisation and operational details WP-EFF web based community space https://community.oecd.org/community/aideffectiveness stacey.bradbury@oecd.org

  5. Monitoring framework: COUNTRY LEVEL FRAMEWORKS Own indicators and targets Lead by the country Results made public + INTERNATIONAL LEVEL FRAMEWORK Selective indicators and targets drawing on a set of core country level indicators Monitor progress on a rolling basis Managed by the Global Partnership

  6. Update on Global Monitoring • Indicators around 7 topics • Results - Inclusive ownership & partnership • Transparency - predictability -accountability • Gender - CD & country systems • Proposition to be made by a group chaired by Rwanda and UK in these days • g7+, Honduras, WB, UNDG, Nepad, BA, Bangladesh, Germany and Canada • Proposed criteria to guide the development of global indicator was approved

  7. Building Blocks

  8. Questions to address • Which Building Blocs are most relevant (1-5) • How should we engage? • Global but also in-country • Country list • Support (research, drafting positions) • How do we relate/use the CSO platform • Who is volunteering/leading for bb • On-line support groups for building blocs • Reacting to documents • Oversight group (online + Paris)

  9. CSO platform • 15 sub-regions + 6 regions • Sectors: labour, women, faith based, rural folk, indigenous, youth, INGOs, … • 7 TU representatives • Specific action plan for ITUC (integrated/separated?) • How to engage • Regional/sub-regional level • International level • How important should this be for us

More Related