1 / 32

The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS

DRAFT 7-20-02. The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS. DRAFT 7-20-02. David L. Tulloch and Tamara Shapiro Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis Cook College, Rutgers University. DRAFT 7-20-02. The Times They are A’Changin’. In 1998:

nola
Télécharger la présentation

The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DRAFT 7-20-02 The Changing Participatory Role of NGOs in New Jersey GIS DRAFT 7-20-02 David L. Tulloch and Tamara Shapiro Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis Cook College, Rutgers University DRAFT 7-20-02

  2. The Times They are A’Changin’ • In 1998: • NJ NGC – The New Jersey Non-Profit GIS Community • NJ DEP • Written up in: • Tulloch, D. 2002. "Environmental NGOs: Community Access to Technology as a Force for Change," chapter in, Community Empowerment, Public Participation and Geographic Information Science. W. Craig, T. Harris, and D. Weiner (Eds.). Taylor and Francis: London.

  3. The Times They are A’Changin’ • Today: • The GIS Center • NGOs helping NGOS • Office of GIS • NJ DEP • Counties?

  4. Background

  5. The Garden State • New Jersey • Densest state in the US • Modest local GIS activity • Tradition of Strong Home Rule • NJ State Mapping Advisory Committee • Environmental NGOs

  6. New Jersey Then • Environmental NGOs are a dominant force • Using public data to participate • Taking on roles sometimes reserved for local governments • Assisting/demanding the development of publicly accessible local geospatial data

  7. Understanding the Garden State

  8. Previous conditions • Pre-existing conditions that cannot be easily changed, or copied • Environmental condition • Density and development • Geophysical intersection • Political situation • Strong Home Rule (566 Municipalities) • Confounding parcel regulations • Local cost recovery as allowed by NJ Supreme Court

  9. 1972

  10. 1984

  11. 1995

  12. Promoting PPGIS in NJ • Office of GIS • Distributing foundational data • Distributing software • requiring hardware and training • NJ Non-profit GIS Community • Providing technical support • Access to high-end hardware and software • User group (emotional support?)

  13. Different Decisions Different Ways

  14. Public Decisions • What are the decisions in which NGOs are participating? • 3 decisions stand out • Municipal Land Use Decisions • State-wide Environmental Policies (regulatory) • State Agency Land Acquisition Decisions

  15. Participation (as in 1998) members Public Decision NGOs Citizens LAND GIS $

  16. Participation (new) GIS-based facts Public Decision Citizens NGOs LAND GIS

  17. Non-Participation NGOs Citizens LAND Not trivial uses

  18. Participation and Access • What is the difference? • Tulloch, D., and T. Shapiro, 2002, “The Intersection of Data Access and Public Participation: Impacting GIS Users' Success?” URISA Journal (Under Review).

  19. A Y N N P Y

  20. A Y N N P Y The Nature Conservancy (of NJ) • Access to public data and information • Using outside participatory avenues http://nature.org

  21. A Y N N P Y Delaware & Raritan Canal • Access to public data and information • Using outside participatory avenues http://www.delrargreenway.org/

  22. A Y N N P Y Morris Land Conservancy • Access to public data and information • Using data inside and outside participatory avenues http://www.morrislandconservancy.org/

  23. NJ Conservation Foundation • Access to public data and information • Using within participatory avenues • Guiding state open space acquisitionplan A Y N N P Y http://www.njconservation.org/

  24. A Y N N P Y Passaic River Coalition • Access to public data and information • Using within and outside participatory avenues http://www.njconservation.org/

  25. Conclusions

  26. A Community At-Risk • While the elements in this community seem to have become institutionalized, there are significant opportunities for instability • The relationships that maintain the network could quickly dissolve • The data, now readily available, could become scarce

  27. Chain Reaction? NGC The GIS Center Relationships Feedback Long-term Stability

  28. Barriers to Participation • Budgets • Technical problems • Insufficient access • Parcel data • By far the most common answer • Zoning (566) • Natural resources (Improved soils) • Updated land use/land cover

  29. Getting to Participation • Through Sophisticated Mapping • “Wow, Nice Map!” • “Can we get your data?” • Through Analysis • “You scared the Hell out of us and now you have to do something!”

  30. A Model For Others? • Participation Proxies • Networks of Data Sharing • Ways of circumventing data access problems • Stealth GIS • Inexpensive opportunities still exist to impress and gain credibility and thereby “earn a seat at the table”

  31. Want More? • dtulloch@crssa.rutgers.edu • tshapiro@aesop.rutgers.edu • www.crssa.rutgers.edu/dtulloch/ppgis/ DRAFT 7-20-02 DRAFT 7-20-02

More Related