1 / 31

Tracy Agerton Director, Epidemiology Office Bureau of TB Control, NYC

Inter-jurisdictional Efforts to Find Contacts to MDR TB Outbreak Among HIV-infected Homeless, New York City, 2005. Tracy Agerton Director, Epidemiology Office Bureau of TB Control, NYC Field Services Branch, DTBE, CDC. Background. Infectious period: 1/11/2005-7/5/2005 for all 3 cases.

noreen
Télécharger la présentation

Tracy Agerton Director, Epidemiology Office Bureau of TB Control, NYC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inter-jurisdictional Efforts to Find Contacts to MDR TB Outbreak Among HIV-infected Homeless, New York City, 2005 Tracy Agerton Director, Epidemiology Office Bureau of TB Control, NYC Field Services Branch, DTBE, CDC

  2. Background Infectious period: 1/11/2005-7/5/2005 for all 3 cases

  3. Background Residence A • Transitional, harm-reduction residence • Primarily HIV-infected, homeless, drug users • 5-story building ~30 years old • 40 residents, 13 on each floor • Common rooms, ate meals together • Resident rooms with 1-6 person occupancy • No mechanical ventilation • Window A/C units, but not in Patient A’s room

  4. Contacts at Residence A • 109 close contacts • 33 current residents • 27 staff • 49 discharged residents

  5. Methods—Case FindingDischarged Residents • Reviewed residence records to obtain locating information • 3 PHAs fulltime for 2 weeks • 3 home visits attempted • Phone calls to programs/next of kin/home/providers

  6. Methods—Case FindingDischarged Residents • Registry searches • TB • Prison • HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) • Department of Homeless Services (DHS) • HIV/AIDS Surveillance • Letters sent to providers of record • Nature of exposure • Recommendations for evaluation and treatment • F/u for results of evaluations

  7. Results—Case Finding • 109 close contacts • 33 current residents • 100% evaluated • 1 additional case identified • 50% on TLTBI • 27 staff • 85% evaluated • 58% on TLTBI • 49 discharged residents • 23 located and evaluated • 39% on TLTBI

  8. Continual Case FindingDischarged Residents • 26 discharged residents not found • Monthly registry checks • HASA • Prison • HIV/AIDS • November: PHRI and NJ DOH notified BTBC of Strain W case diagnosed in NJ • Discharged resident from Resident A • Homeless in NJ since June 2005

  9. Intra-jurisdictional Case Surveillance and Contact Tracing Efforts • HAN alert (NYC: AIDS Institute, Inter- City ID Rounds, NYS DOH, NJ DOH, CDC, PR TB Control, NTCA) • Watch list of all HIV-infected contacts (NYC TB surveillance, NYS DOH, NJ DOH) • Continue monthly registry checks (NYC prison, DHS/HASA, TB registry, NYC death registry) • Found 1 d/c resident found through NYC death registry match • Cause of death: metastatic esophoegeal cancer 11/05 • NYS prison search • Found 2 more d/c residents • Both fully evaluated and on TLTBI with MXF

  10. Summary • Extensive transmission • Rapid progression to disease • Active case finding identified one additional MDR TB case • Home visits and contact with providers proved effective • Registry match with HIV surveillance was useful • Shared genotyping and outbreak information with other jurisdictions vital

  11. Lessons Learned • Case finding activities should be initiated in settings for HIV-infected individuals where TB transmission is evident • Alerts to neighboring jurisdictions should occur earlier • Confidentiality and privacy issues • Expansion to other jurisdictions for contact tracing extremely useful • Routine information sharing around outbreaks • Partnering with other DOHMH Bureaus (HIV, Correctional Health) very helpful

  12. Acknowledgements NYC DOHMH BTBCResidence ANYC DOHMH HIV/AIDS Shameer Poonja Valentina Digrasso Judy Sackoff Cindy Driver Pedro Gonzalez Lucia Torian Ann Winters Lissette Rivas Rachel Wiseman Krishen Khemraj NJ TB ControlPHRI Darrin Taylor Mark Wolman Barry Kreisworth Christine Chuck Tom Privett Kareen Joseph Sonal Munsiff NYS TB Control Diana Nilsen Margaret Oxtoby Felicia Stubblefield Abari Sulayman NYC DOHMH Correctional Health Hope Campbell Woody Franklin Tholief O’Flaherty Farah Parvez Maria Gbur

  13. NYC STRAIN W NJ Mark Wolman NJMS Global TB Institute

  14. Background-1 • Patient FG was admitted to local hospital on September 13, 2005 with a diagnosis of suspected pulmonary TB • history of cough 1- 3 months • chest x-ray consistent with TB (non-cavitary) • sputum smear positive (4+)

  15. Background-2 • Infectious period established at March 1- September 13, 2005 • During the infectious period the index patient indicated the following • single and homeless in Newark • address given to the hospital was a local flower shop • sat outside flower shop all day/every day • identified no family, friends nor social activities • identified no places of worship, employment, hangouts, shelters, hospitalizations, ED visits or incarceration • denied any local or extensive travel

  16. Background-3 • On September 19 initial culture collected on hospital admission identified as MTB • On November 8 susceptibility pattern indicated first line resistance • From this date forward new information collected identifying congregate setting exposures in two hospital settings during the infectious period moves to forefront of investigation

  17. Some Early Problem Indicators…… • Despite an order of airborne infection isolation on admission to one of the hospitals • early report by nursing station indicated that door to patient’s room left open and that the patient was seen occasionally leaving the room and walking the floor unmasked • airborne infection isolation discontinued later on the same day of admission for no apparent nor documented reason • During admission to the above hospital index patient was placed on same floor as high risk patients • Potential exposure to HCW’S and patients

  18. Patient Time LineMarch 1-December 17, 2005 12/17 3/1 6/1 6/15 6/16-22 6/30 7/4 7/6 7/12-15 7/23 7/24 7/25 8/13 8/17-22 9/5 9/13 9/19 11/8 11/10 11/28 12/2 12/14 Strain W Linked to Bronx outbreak NJ Health Alert Hosp #1 In-pt SP SM 4+ Aii ordered Drug Resistance Hosp #1 ED Pneumonia Hosp #1 ED Rash Hosp #2 In-pt Rash Hosp #2 ED Rash Hosp #2 ED Rash Hosp #2 ED Rash Watch List to NJ PT Expired Hosp #2 ED Rash Hosp #2 ED Rash Hosp #2 ED Rash PHRI IS6110 Genotyping MTB Hosp #2 In-pt Faint at B.S. Pneumonia Cough 1-2 mos Aii d/c Hosp #1 In-pt Pneumonia NYC EXP Hosp #1 ED Cough

  19. Health Alert-1 • Issued by the Deputy Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Health & Senior Services • alerting local health departments, clinicians and hospitals of Strain W cluster among HIV infected individuals in NYC • HIV infected homeless contacts linked to NYC investigation remain in the community and had not as yet been located • NJ and NYC DOH working closely to locate and medically assess the identified contacts

  20. Health Alert-2 • Medical providers urged to • isolate HIV infected homeless individuals who report a history of residing in NYC since January, 2005 and who present with symptoms of pulmonary TB • collect respiratory specimens • suspect drug resistance if these patients do not respond to standard TB therapy

  21. Hospital AssessmentJuly 12-15, 2005 Admission- 1

  22. Diagnosis of Hospitalized Patients HIV/AIDS 18(42%) Diabetes 7(16%) Renal 3(7%) Sickle Cell 3(7%) Cancer 3(7%) Pneumonia 3(7%) Liver Disease 1(2%) Cholecystitis 1(2%) Gangrene 1(2%) Cysts 1(2%) Pituitary tumor 1(2%) Alcohol 1(2%) Total 43 (100%)

  23. Some Early Complications…. • Identified patient contacts were themselves a very diverse medically complex group • If a second line latent treatment could be offered could these patients tolerate the medication? • Would they complete treatment?

  24. Hospital Assessment - 2

  25. Hospital Assessment - 3

  26. Summary of Final Assessment -1 • Throffer Diffuser Ventilation system • every 3 feet intake and outtake vents lined alongside ceiling lighting fixtures throughout the length and width of hospital floor • no shared or re-circulated air on floor • fresh air pumped in directly from roof to floor • environment air from floor pumped directly back to roof • provides 14 air exchanges per hour • isolation ante room has own intake and outtake vents • functional system as evidenced by testing provided by hospital engineering department

  27. Final Assessment - 2 • Confirmation of initial nursing report of door to patient’s room left open • Initial report of patient walking the floor unmasked proved erroneous

  28. Outcomes To Date • All HCW’s identified and tested at both hospitals were TST negative • Based on the ventilation system that exists in the hospital coupled with the confirmation that the index patient did not leave his room during the July hospitalization the risk of transmission to patients had been reduced from high to low priority • No testing recommended for hospitalized patients

  29. Lessons Learned…And Re-learned - 1 • Maintain adherence to the basic principles of conducting congregate setting investigations • initiate and conduct on-site assessment of identified exposure environment(s) • collect information • confirm accuracy of information collected • review and analyze information collected • develop plan of action based on accurate information

  30. Lessons Learned…And Re-learned - 2 • As best as possible avoid decision-making that is driven by the perceived drama of the moment • Remain aware of the function and benefits of sharing information beyond geographic boundaries where there is frequent and easy access across state, county or city lines • watch lists • DNA fingerprinting results

  31. The role in TB Control of institutions like PHRI is not only in the linking of patients through molecular epidemiology but in the linking of programs for the purpose of better understanding transmission and contact tracing of TB

More Related