1 / 9

Tronc commun Master en études du développement Année académique 2009/10

Sociologie politique du développement (Re)thinking the State. Tronc commun Master en études du développement Année académique 2009/10. The State as an institution. There are no societies without rules and no rules without a power ensuring their implementation

odessa-kaufman
Télécharger la présentation

Tronc commun Master en études du développement Année académique 2009/10

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sociologie politique du développement (Re)thinking the State Tronc commun Master en études du développement Année académique 2009/10

  2. The State as an institution • There are no societies without rules and no rules without a power ensuring their implementation • In political science, sets of rules are called INSTITUTIONS, i.e . collection of agreed norms, procedures and routines, either formal (written) or informal (oral, customary) • Polities, i.e. forms of rule, have varied across space and over time (from decentralized to centralized ; from tribal chieftainships to empires)

  3. The State as an institution (2) • The “modern” centralized European State has emerged and consolidated between the 16th and early 20th century (in late 15th century Europe, 500 independent political units ; by 1900, 25 modern States) • Through imperialism and colonialism new States have emerged around the globe

  4. The invention of the “Modern” State • Def. : a set of political apparatuses distinct from both ruler and ruled, with supreme jurisdiction over a demarcated territory, backed by a claim to a monopoly of coercive power and enjoying legitimacy as a result of a minimum level of support or loyalty from their citizens. • PUBLIC INSTITUTION (government, legislature, courts, civil service, army, police, … versus private and non-state institutions) • SOVERAIGNTY AND HEGEMONY • FORMAL MONOPOLICY OF VIOLENCE • IMPARTIAL BUREAUCRACY (impersonal, neutral, does not make law, independent from government and political parties … versus CORRUPTION, PATRONAGE, CLIENTELISM

  5. The invention of the modern State (2) • BUT : • Is the State an autonomous entity with its interests ? • Can the State be neutral ? Do elites and certain classes dominate ? • What should be the role of the State in economy and society ?

  6. Historical context of modern State development • The modern State has emerged in the course of the GREAT TRANSFORMATION from agrarian to industrial societies (+ scientific and technological innovations : printing, mapping and numbering) • The MODERN STATE was both the PRODUCT and the AGENT of that transformation : the role and function of the state has been to promote, organize, protect and sustain this economic and social transformation to industrialism (and beyond in the post-industrialized era)

  7. Historical context of modern State development (2) • 3 critical issues : • DEFENSE against external attacks and internal security (rich country = strong army) • POLITICAL REPRESENTATION (developed country = democratic country) • Promotion/protection of the economy with State provision of WELFARE (successful economies and successful States go hand in hand)

  8. The State models in the 20th century • ANGLO-AMERICAN AND WESTERN EUROPEAN STATE : insures promotion of private, market driven growth (by securing property rights, establishing fair and efficient juridical systems, setting an open and agreed upon system of rules and regulations …. • SOVIET MODEL : Forced top-down industrialization, involving pervasive state ownership, control and management of the economy, mobilization by the State (not the market) of human and material resources in pursuit of transformative objectives • DEVELOPMENTAL STATE – EAST-ASIAN MODEL (Japan after 1870, South-Korea and Taiwan from the 1950s onwards) : State and private sector symbiosis, governing the market, managed capitalism

  9. The State in the developing world • Formation of modern State in colonial and post-colonial contexts has not been geared to the development of institutions directed at promoting economic growth or transformative development • The kind of modern State institutions in the Third World vary widely and are shaped by the interaction of 4 main factors : • The nature of pre-colonial polities • The economic purposes of colonial rule • The characteristics of the colonial State institutions and the socio-political groups who dominated them • The manner of incorporation of pre-colonial polities and institutions in the system of colonial and post-colonial rule

More Related