1 / 7

Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks

Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks. draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt. Presenter : Dan Li (danli@ HUAWEI .com) Authors : Guowu Xie (blithe@ SJTU .edu.cn) Weiqiang Sun (sunwq@ SJTU .edu.cn)

oliver
Télécharger la présentation

Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Label Switched Path (LSP) Dynamical Provisioning Performance Metrics in Generalized MPLS Networks draft-xie-ccamp-lsp-dppm-01.txt Presenter: Dan Li (danli@HUAWEI.com) Authors: Guowu Xie (blithe@SJTU.edu.cn) Weiqiang Sun (sunwq@SJTU.edu.cn) Guoying Zhang (zhangguoying@mail.RITT.com.cn) Xueqing Wei (xqwei@FIBERHOME.com.cn) Jianhua Gao (gjhhit@HUAWEI.com) Bin Gu (bgu@IXIACOM.com)

  2. Motivations of this draft • Measuring LSP provisioning performance in the lab • Requirements of dynamical provisioning capability in GMPLS Networks: interactive broadband multimedia services. • Let the requirement of applications and the provisioning capability of the network be mapped to each other • Measuring the provisioning performance in operational networks • Monitor the control plane performance in real-time • Helpful to the GMPLS network maintenance and optimization. • Standardized metrics and the way to measure them precisely should be defined • In scope of CCAMP charter: “Definition of MIB modules and other OAM techniques relevant to the protocols and extensions specified within the WG.” • Maximize common understanding of LSP provisioning performance between the service providers and network users/applications

  3. Changes with version 00 • Explicit statements on applicability of including the defined metrics in GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB • In abstract and introduction • A couple of changes in the text • Correct the errors in 7.6, 8.7 • Revising 4.1, 4.7, 5.4, 6, 8.7, 9.1 • Measurement time unit changed from ‘seconds’ to ‘milli-seconds’ • In all effected sections

  4. Topics discussed in the group • Motivating the metrics • The metrics themselves received no objections. They seem well motivated through the discussions in the group. • Setup Ratio • Will be added in the next update • RSVP convergence and graceful restart • Will be considered in the next update • Including a set of metrics into GMPLS-TE-STD-MIB • A reference to RFC 4802 will be added in the next update • Discussions on harmonizing withSamir’s draft on RSVP-TE convergence (In BMWG) • Rough consensus reached: retaining this draft in CCAMP • Further work underway • Rerouting performance • It is still a pending problem, need more input from the group and WG

  5. Next Steps • Reach a consensus in CCAMP on the defined metrics • Harmonization with RSVP-TE convergence draft • More discussions on • MIB inclusion of some of the metrics • LSP rerouting performance • P2MP performance metrics • Authors need more feedback in the WG mailing list.

  6. Backup slides

  7. Milestones of this draft • Feb. 2007, 00 Version published (Guowu Xie) • Mar. 2007, Presented at the 68th IETF meeting (Guoying zhang) • Apr. 2007, A discussion group is setup (Guoying Zhang) • Participants: Deborah, Monique, Luyuan Fang, Al Morton, Julien Meuric, Itaru Nishioka, and all authors • Jun. 2007, Version 01 published (Weiqiang Sun) • Jun. 2007, harmonization with RSVP-TE convergence draft begins (Monique Morrow) • Samir Vapiwala, Karu and Zafar Ali are introduced into the discussion group

More Related