1 / 9

The Case of Manufacturing

The Case of Manufacturing. Vulnerability, and Organising the ‘Once Organised’. Jean Jenkins Cardiff Business School and CGLR jenkinsj1@cardiff.ac.uk. Vulnerable Work.

olympe
Télécharger la présentation

The Case of Manufacturing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Case of Manufacturing Vulnerability, and Organising the ‘Once Organised’. Jean Jenkins Cardiff Business School and CGLR jenkinsj1@cardiff.ac.uk

  2. Vulnerable Work • TUC CoVE Report: ‘vulnerable work is insecure, low paid and places workers at high risk of employment rights abuse’ (2008: 11) • This presentation examines a case of ‘displaced’ manufacturing workers made redundant from a factory which had defined generations of lives within one community – the Burberry factory at Treorchy, in the Rhondda Valleys. • It highlights how quickly workers may fall out of the category of ‘secure’, albeit low paid employment, into vulnerability, and raises issues in relation to union organising.

  3. Local Context • Decline of coal mining and all forms of manufacturing characterises a locality where redundancy is no stranger. • Original factory was set up in 1937, Burberry took full ownership in the 1990s. • Generations had worked at the plant, mainly female but also men working in cutting, stores and maintenance. • Profitable plant. • High union density • ‘We never thought it would close …’

  4. Relocation and Campaigning • September 2006: Burberry give 90 days notice of relocation to China. • High profile union campaign in alliance with local politicians – a community within and outside the plant. • Burberry employees mobilised around the ‘big idea’ that they were being disadvantaged by corporate greed • Celebrities; media attention; demonstrations outside the London store; international solidarity and demonstrations in Paris and Chicago; documentaries and a play; tea at the Ritz … • Outcomes: doubled redundancy payments; extended the life of the factory by 3 months; community fund … ‘we stood up to be counted …’

  5. One year on … • Questionnaire issued to shop floor employees yielded 80 replies • 75% of respondents in paid work. • 59% of those respondents reported their earnings were now lower. • Factory earnings were around £208 per week. • 51% of those respondents were in ‘part-time’ work, with hours ranging from 6 – 30 per week. • The main areas of work were home-care and retail.

  6. Women’s Work • Child care, low wages and domestic responsibilities limit the capacity for travelling for work. • Variable hours in retail and home-care. • Retail hours vary, but are generally capped at 16 per week. • Home care hours notified one week in advance – workers work ‘from home’. • In one example earnings can vary from £75 to £150 from one week to another. • Home care is a local authority service and this is not agency work.

  7. Men’s Work • Building trades, and some better manufacturing opportunities outside the immediate locality, but reliant on ability to travel. • Local manufacturing – box manufacture and double glazing. • Double glazing factories regularly lay-off before holiday periods and in months when trade falls. • Difficult to build continuity of employment. • Constant insecurity for male and female wage earners in the household.

  8. Unionisation • 75% of respondents who were in paid work were no longer members of a trade union. • These are workers who were mobilised to spectacular effect just twelve months earlier. • Once displaced from the community of the factory, and without a union structure around them, even these workers fall prey to the nature of vulnerable work. • Participation in a union campaign did not necessarily make them union activists or knowledgeable about their individual or collective rights. • There is a need to organise again the ‘once organised’.

  9. Concluding points for consideration … • Vulnerable work is everywhere, and it is not only ‘rogue’ employers who are engaged in practices which cause hardship and isolate workers from one another. • Organising vulnerable workers and challenging their employers strains resources and has enormous difficulties, but • Campaigning unionism cannot succeed in strengthening the union movement if it is characterised by a series of isolated campaigns; workers need to see the ongoing importance of union membership in their daily working lives, and to feel they have greater power inside a union. • ‘Seeing’ the union via individual / collective grievance and disciplinary cases may be a potent organising tool.

More Related