1 / 7

Registration Abuse Policies WG

Registration Abuse Policies WG. Marika Konings Registrar Stakeholder Group Meeting 9 March 2010. Background. Registries and registrars seem to lack uniform approaches to deal with domain name registration abuse What role ICANN should play in addressing registration abuse?

omer
Télécharger la présentation

Registration Abuse Policies WG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Registration Abuse Policies WG Marika Konings Registrar Stakeholder Group Meeting 9 March 2010

  2. Background • Registries and registrars seem to lack uniform approaches to deal with domain name registration abuse • What role ICANN should play in addressing registration abuse? • What issues, if any, are suitable for GNSO policy development? • Registration Abuse Policies Pre-PDP Working Group launched in March 2009

  3. Objective RAP WG tasked to address issues such as: • What is the difference between registration abuse and domain name use abuse? • What is the effectiveness of existing abuse policies? • Would there be benefits to a more uniform approach by registries and registrars? • Initial Report published on 12 Feb 2010

  4. Initial Report WG developed a list of abuses, developed definition, determined what registration issues exists (if any), scope and policy issues involved Recommendations included relate to: • Cybersquatting • Whois Access • Malicious Use of Domain Names • Front-Running • Fake Renewal Notices • Domain Kiting • Deceptive and/or Offensive Domain Names • Uniformity of Contracts • Meta Issues

  5. Next Steps • RAPWG will review and analyze the comments received during the public comment period • Update Report accordingly • Presentation of Final Report to the GNSO Meeting in time for the ICANN meeting in Brussels • GNSO Council to consider recommendations and decide on next steps

  6. Further Information & Participation • Public Comment Forum on the Initial Report (until 28 March): http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#rap-initial-report • Registration Abuse Policies Initial Report http://gnso.icann.org/issues/rap-wg-initial-report-12feb10-en.pdf • More detailed presentation of Initial Report recommendations to GNSO Council in Wednesday during Open Meeting • RAP Initial Report Information Session on Wednesday from 16.00 – 17.30

  7. QUESTIONS?

More Related