1 / 16

eCampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat

eCampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat. http://blog.ecampus.no/. Jan Meijer 21 April 2010 eCampus arbeidsgruppemøte. photo by Henrik Thorburn. eCampus goal. 3 scenarios. different needs, different tools. many roads to salvation. ?. DimDim. Microsoft OCS. GoTo Meeting. Nefsis.

ona
Télécharger la présentation

eCampus webmøter diskusjonsnotat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. eCampuswebmøterdiskusjonsnotat http://blog.ecampus.no/ Jan Meijer 21 April 2010 eCampusarbeidsgruppemøte photo by Henrik Thorburn

  2. eCampusgoal

  3. 3 scenarios

  4. different needs, different tools

  5. many roads to salvation ? DimDim Microsoft OCS GoTo Meeting Nefsis AdobeConnect Tandberg Movi WebEx NTR Meeting Elluminate BeamYourScreen MegaMeeting AviCom

  6. 13:00 Friday, 16 April 2010

  7. * $149 = NOK 889 **with less functionality prices are annual

  8. use our rooms? • Adobe Connect (20) • DimDim (50) • NTRmeeting (50) ecampus-intern@uninett.no ring Ingrid, Jan, Magnus

  9. What to do?

  10. thought 1: It’s there! teach, train, change mentality GET IT USED The challenge is NOT technological

  11. thought 2: It could be better 300.000 room admins? Feide login? Take out recordings? STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP

  12. what do YOU think? • the previous? • the assumptions? • the open questions? • the sketched options? the suggested next steps?

  13. Open questions (1) • Q1: Who’s currently using what? • Q2: Who’s investigating? • Q3: When? Fall 2010? December 2010? • Q4: Scenarios correct? • Q5: Assumptions • a) Platform support importance: • MS, Mac, Linux?, Mobile platforms? • b) Good enough beats tight integration? • c) Meetings initiated from within institution? • d) Outside persons MUST be able to join • Q6: Other assumptions correct?

  14. Open questions (2) • Q7: How many rooms needed? • Q8: Logical intervals for Max. #attendees/room • Q9: Which licensing model is realistic? • # rooms? • # rooms + #max users/room? • # concurrent users?

  15. Possible options • Do nothing • Increase competence and skills • Document common requirements • Market reconnaissance • Sector wide (framework) agreement • Open services • Establish shared solution for sector • Services of other NRENs • UNINETT service • Open source based pilot service • Extending open services

  16. Suggested next steps • Establish eCampus working group • publish recommendations on audio • publish common web conferencing reqs • Market reconnaissance • functionality • licensing models/costs • open services • Reach consensus on sector wide solutions

More Related