1 / 44

Integrated Planning

Integrated Planning. ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2013 Marybeth Buechner, Sacramento City College Dolores Davison, Foothill College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator. How to maintain and demonstrate institutional effectiveness. Lean times Growth times.

opal
Télécharger la présentation

Integrated Planning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Planning ASCCC Accreditation Institute 2013 Marybeth Buechner, Sacramento City College Dolores Davison, Foothill College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator

  2. How to maintain and demonstrate institutional effectiveness Lean times Growth times

  3. Integrated Planning and the Standards Accreditation Standards Adopted June 2002 Revised June 2012 Edited November 2012 Integrated Planning is addressed in each of the four Standards.

  4. Introduction to the Standards… “The institution provides the means for students to learn, assesses how well learning is occurring, and strives to improve that learning through ongoing, systematic, and integrated planning.”

  5. Standard I: Institutional Mission and Effectiveness “The institution uses analyses of quantitative data in an ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, implementation, and re-evaluation to verify and improve the effectiveness by which the mission is accomplished.”

  6. I. B. 3. “The institution assesses progress toward achieving its stated goals and makes decisions regarding the improvement of effectiveness in a ongoing and systematic cycle of evaluation, integrated planning, resource allocation, implementation, and reevaluation.”

  7. Standard II. Student Learning Programs and Services II. A. 2. f. “The institution engages in ongoing, systematic evaluation and integrated planning to assure currency and measure achievement of its stated student learning outcomes in courses, certificates, programs including general and vocational education, and degrees.”

  8. III. A. Human Resources III. A. 6. “Human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.”

  9. III. B. Physical Resources III. B. 2. b. “Physical resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.”

  10. III. C. Technology Resources III. C. 2. “Technology planning is integrated with institutional planning.”

  11. III. D. Financial Resources “Financial resources planning is integrated with institutional planning at both college and district/system levels in multi-college systems.” III. D. 1. a. “Financial planning is integrated with and supports all institutional planning.” III. D. 4. “Financial resource planning is integrated with institutional planning.”

  12. IV. Leadership and Governance IV. B. 2. b. “The president guides institutional improvement of the teaching and learning environment by the following: “… ensuring that educational planning is integrated with resources planning and distribution to achieve student learning outcomes…”

  13. Integrated Planning in 2009at Foothill College

  14. Integrated Planning at Foothill College • Work to create a clearer and more integrated planning process began in 2009 • Surveys were distributed to all participants every spring to gauge issues and concerns • Integrated Planning and Budget task force meets each summer to discuss survey and recommend means by which to address concerns • New structure was put into place in 2009-10

  15. Membership Tri-Chairs: College President, Academic Senate President, Classified Senate President Voting Members: Tri-Chairs from each of the four work groups (Basic Skills, Transfer, Operations, and Workforce), along with four students (ASFC President, Student Trustee, two other senators from ASFC) Non-voting representatives from all bargaining units and other interested parties (Multicultural Staff Association, Sustainability Committee, etc.)

  16. Integrated Planning in a Multi-College DistrictSacramento City College (Los Rios CCD) Presented by Dr. Marybeth Buechner Dean of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness, SCC

  17. Critical functions coordinated under the district umbrella.

  18. Planning levels build upon one another

  19. Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System Purposeful planning process that results in: Institutional effectiveness Mission accomplishment Continuous improvement The system… • Is integrated with District planning • Consists of an integrated family of plans • Includes numerous feedback loops between assessment and plans Outcome Based Data Driven

  20. College plan is mapped to district plan (example below)

  21. College Plans are integrated with resource allocation and assessment

  22. SCC Family of Plans Strategic Master Plan Institutional Plans Educational Plan Resource Management & Capital Outlay Plan Student Support Services Plan Professional Development Safety & Security Distance Education Program Plans Tutoring Services Matriculation Plan Marketing Foundation Other Program Plans Operational Unit Plans U n i t P l a n s Resource Plans Information Technology Financial Facilities Faculty Classified Staff

  23. District Strategic Plan District Trend Analysis Institutional Plans Resource Plans Institutional & Resource Metrics Program Reviews Program Data & SLOs SCC Strategic Plan Institutional Effectiveness Data Unit Plans Unit Outcomes & SLOs Resource Allocation Unit Resource Requests Program Plans Program Metrics Program Plan Resource Requests

  24. An Example of Integrated Planning in ActionThe SCC Davis Educational Center SCC’s Values Working Together, Pursuing Excellence, and Inspiring Achievement

  25. Integrated Planning at SCC in ActionDavis Educational Center Integrated with LRCCD Strategic Planning “…in the year 2000, the Los Rios Board of Trustees made a policy decision to guide the growth of the district by developing regional centers…” (LRCCD Centers Development Guidelines) LRCCD “A Plan for Educating the Region” (2003) LRCCD Centers Development Policy (2006) LRCCD 5-Year Construction Plan (2007) LRCCD Centers Development Guidelines (2008) LRCCD Timelines for Center Approval (2008) LRCCD Strategic Master Plan (2006 and 2011)

  26. Integrated Planning at SCC in ActionDavis Educational Center Center planning is integrated across SCC “Provide consistent, comprehensive counseling services at the outreach centers by assigning regular tenure track counselors to both the Davis and West Sacramento” (Objective 4.3 , Counseling 2009 Program Review) Institutional Plans including the Educational Master Plan, Resource Management & Capital Outlay Plan, and Student Support Service Plan Program Plans and Unit Plans for departments in both Student Services and Instruction Resource Plans – Financial Plan, Facilities Plan, Classified Staff Plan, and Information Technology Plan.

  27. Integrated Planning at SCC in ActionDavis Educational Center Center outcomes are integrated with the assessment of institutional effectiveness. “Ensure that processes, services, curriculum and instructional design result in equivalent student outcomes for all modalities and locations” (College goal/strategy) Unit Plan Outcomes Reports Program Reviews Annual fiscal and resource allocation metrics Student success data

  28. Integrated Planning at SCC in ActionDavis Educational Center The Davis Center is fully integrated into the larger college and district. • Faculty are part of the College’s academic divisions. • Students services and learning resources are fully integrated with overall college services. • The Davis Center Dean works with both instruction and student services. The SCC Davis Center was honored as the District's Program of the Year.

  29. District Strategic Plan District Trend Analysis Institutional Plans Resource Plans Institutional & Resource Metrics Program Reviews Program Data SLOs SCC Strategic Plan Institutional Effectiveness Data Unit Plans Unit Objectives SLOs Resource Allocation Unit Resource Requests Program Plans Program Metrics Program Plan Resource Requests

  30. Citrus College Integrated Planning • Comprehensive roadmap to fulfill mission and achieve long-term goals • Collegial process based on data-driven decision-making that includes all college constituencies • Data-driven decision-making that includes all college constituencies • Important and ongoing effort

  31. Integrated Planning Manual • Significant component of college-wide effort • Provides an overview of the major planning documents used by the college • Illustrates the connection and interaction between each of the plans • Identifies the integrated planning process • Describes the ways each of the college’s constituent groups participates in and contributes to college planning

  32. Major Planning Documents • Mission, Vision, Values Statements • Program Review • Strategic Plan • Educational and Facilities Master Plan • Sustainability Plan • Technology Plan • Human Resources Plan • Institutional Advancement Plan

  33. Integrated Planning Model Mission, Vision, Values Strategic Plan Board Goals Educational and Facilities Master Plan Institutional Support Plans Annual Implementation Plans/Progress Reports Resource Allocation Annual and Comprehensive Program Reviews Annual and Comprehensive Program Reviews Plan Implementation Assessment Program Improvement

  34. BP 2510 PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL DECISION-MAKING Citrus Community College District is committed to shared and participatory governance principles, designed to guide wise decision making supporting the College’s mission and strategic goals.

  35. Governance and Integrated Planning BP 2510 This governance philosophy is based upon five pillars of shared decision making, all which must be present for effective governance. These pillars are: • shared vision • shared engagement • shared respect • shared information • shared risk.

  36. How?Citrus College Steering Committee Steering Committee guides and assesses major institutional planning initiatives and makes recommendations based on the actions of the Standing Committees.

  37. Major governance committee of the College • Advances mission and objectives of the institution through broad-based participation in the decision-making process • Brings together all constituent groups: faculty, students, classified staff, supervisory and confidential employees, and managers • Serves as a liaison for all college constituents by coordinating the functions of its Standing Committees

  38. Sanctions and Integrated Planning It may be helpful to know…

  39. Top Deficiencies Causing Sanctions(ACCJC Newsletter, June 2012)

  40. Trends in Deficiencies Leading to Sanctions • The proportion of institutions with deficiencies in program review work has decreased considerably from 71% of those on sanction in 2009 to 19% of those on sanction in 2012. • The proportion of institutions with deficiencies in planning practices has decreased somewhat from 92% of those on sanction in 2009 to 71% of those on sanction in 2012. ACCJC Newsletter June 2012

  41. Trends, continued • Internal governance deficiencies have decreased from 46% of those institutions on sanction in 2009 to 18% of those on sanction in 2011. • Of most concern, the proportion of institutions with deficiencies in governing board practices has increased sharply from 46% of on sanction in 2009 to 71% of those on sanction in 2012. • The proportion of institutions on sanction with deficiencies in financial stability or management has remained at or slightly above 50% since 2009. ACCJC Newsletter June 2012

  42. Questions ?

More Related