1 / 11

Developing Nations and Telecoms

Challenges for Successful Implementation of ICT Projects Policy and Regulatory Challenges - Technology Provider’s View - September 14. Developing Nations and Telecoms. Better Telecommunications  Higher GDP Typically 1 Fixed line PTT and 2 Mobile (GSM) Carriers

orde
Télécharger la présentation

Developing Nations and Telecoms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Challenges for Successful Implementation of ICT ProjectsPolicy and Regulatory Challenges- Technology Provider’s View - September 14

  2. Developing Nations and Telecoms • Better Telecommunications  Higher GDP • Typically 1 Fixed line PTT and 2 Mobile (GSM) Carriers • Wireline deployment limited to Metro areas  Long waiting lists • Low GSM penetration – typically due to higher costs • Duopolistic price setting further limits penetration • Regulators Seek to Improve Penetration, and Maximize Existing Assets • Additional licenses intended to spur competition  increased penetration • Utilization of existing assets drives GSM-specific tenders • 3rd, 4th, 5th… Licensees have a very challenging business case: • Incumbents have captured high-ARPU subs • New licensee(s) forced to target lower-ARPU users • If technology specified (say, GSM)  Little room to improve costs • Break-Even Monthly ARPUs: GSM - ~$12; CDMA - $7 Need to encourage technology which offers lower costs, and can thereby support lower ARPUs  Increased Penetration

  3. Regulatory Challenges in Improving Telecoms • Ensuring Technology Neutrality • Responsibility for Efficient Use of Radio Spectrum • Promoting Consolidation with Existing Telecoms Infrastructure • Defining Fixed Wireless vs. Limited Mobility • Enabling Convergence Role of Regulators – Very Crucial

  4. Technology Neutrality • Spectrum availability dictates technology choice • Appropriate spectrum enables innovative/different technology selection • Spectrum efficiency and 3G data benefits should be leveraged • Economies of scale should be leveraged • No Specification of Technology • Let the Best Business Case Win • Limited Specification of Spectrum Allocation Plans • Choice of Technologies Enables Cost-Effective Telecoms Access

  5. Efficient Use of Radio Spectrum • Consider Spectral Efficiency Requirements • No. of subscribers per 5 MHz • Reasonable Licensing Fee • License Fees on per MHz Basis in Blocks of 5 or 10 MHz • Fees independent of technology • Re-Examination of Spectrum Usage • Explore Key spectrum blocks (e.g., 800 MHz, 450 MHz) for possible reallocation/sharing based on actual use; e.g. ITU Region-1 – 800 MHz for broadcasting • Lower end (450/800 MHz vs. 2000 MHz and higher) for wireless • Efficient Spectrum Usage Enables Cost-Effective Telecoms Access

  6. Consolidation with Existing Infrastructure • Require Teaming Between Existing and New Carriers • For common use of established network infrastructure • Interconnect fee structure to encourage new entrant(s) • Require new carriers to have technological solution compatible with incumbents • GSM1x - Technology for GSM  CDMA Interoperability

  7. Defining Fixed vs. Limited Mobility • Terminal form factor not important (well maybe a little!) • It’s ok to specify terminal form factor (FWT vs. Handheld), however : • Mobile handsets cost much less than FWTs and provide better user experience (users will make the FWTs mobile anyway!) • Some applications available only on mobile terminals and not FWTs • WLL and Handoff are NOT Mutually Exclusive • Retaining soft-handoff improves coverage, capacity, quality and data rates • Multi-path (signal received from multiple sites) improves voice quality and system capacity • Cell breathing is not a concern  more effective network planning and optimization • Avoid “Watch-Dog” Role for Regulator Certain geographical (city or region limit) or numbering plan based restrictions may be considered for WLL/Limited Mobility

  8. Convergence Licensing • Convergence Happening at the Device Level • Licensing policy needs to address this • Allow Carriers to Offer Fixed (e.g., WLL), Mobile, Data, Broadcast, etc. Services • Fixed Limited Mobility Full Mobility Convergence • e.g. India’s “Unified License” regime • Promote Carriers in Providing Different Tiering of Service Plans • Converged licenses Possible at Network Facility, Services, ISP, Content layers Convergence is Future

  9. Success Story • This approach has resulted in the world’s cheapest wireless access and explosive teledensity growth in India

  10. Thank You! For additional information and questions, please contact: Sachin Bhatmuley +1 858 658 1224 sachinb@qualcomm.com

  11. Example of Wireless Market Segmentation: Sub-Saharan Africa

More Related