1 / 17

1 st lecture

1 st lecture. Probabilities and Prospect Theory. Probabilities. In a text over 10 standard novel-pages, how many 7-letter words are of the form: _ _ _ _ ing _ _ _ _ _ ly _ _ _ _ _n_. Linda and Bill.

oren-spence
Télécharger la présentation

1 st lecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1st lecture Probabilities and Prospect Theory

  2. Probabilities • In a text over 10 standard novel-pages, how many 7-letter words are of the form: • _ _ _ _ ing • _ _ _ _ _ ly • _ _ _ _ _n_

  3. Linda and Bill • “Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations.” • Linda is a teacher in elementary school • Linda is active in the feminist movement (F) • Linda is a bank teller (B) • Linda is an insurance sales person • Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement (B&F) • Probability rank: • Naïve: B&F – 3,3; B – 4,4 • Sophisticated: B&F – 3,2; B – 4,3.

  4. Indirect and Direct tests • Indirect versus direct • Are both A&B and A in same questionnaire? • Transparent • Argument 1: Linda is more likely to be a bank teller than she is to be a feminist bank teller, because every feminist bank teller is a bank teller, but some bank tellers are not feminists and Linda could be one of them (35%) • Argument 2: Linda is more likely to be a feminist bank teller than she is likely to be a bank teller, because she resembles an active feminist more than she resembles a bank teller (65%)

  5. Extensional versus intuitive • Extensional reasoning • Lists, inclusions, exclusions. Events • Formal statistics. • If , Pr(A) ≥ Pr (B) • Moreover: • Intuitive reasoning • Not extensional • Heuristic • Availability and Representativity. • _ _ _ _ ing

  6. Availability Heuristics • We assess the probability of an event by the ease with witch we can create a mental picture of it. • Works good most of the time. • Frequency of words • A: _ _ _ _ ing (13.4) • B: _ _ _ _ _ n _ ( 4.7) • Now, and hence Pr(B)≥Pr(A) • But ….ing words are easier to imagine • Watching TV affect our probability assessment of violent crimes, divorce and heroic doctors. (O’Guinn and Schrum)

  7. Expected utility • Preferences over lotteries • Notation • (x1,p1;…;xn,pn)= x1 with probability p1; … and xn with probability pn • Null outcomes not listed: • (x1,p1) means x1 with probability p1 and 0 with probability 1-p1 • (x) means x with certainty.

  8. Independence Axiom • If A ~ B, then (A,p;…)~ (B,p;…) • Add continuity: if b(est) > x > w(orst) then there is a p=u(x) such that (b,p;w,1-p)~ (x) • It follows that lotteries should be ranked according to Expected utility Max ∑ piu(xi)

  9. Proof • Start with (x1,p1;x2,p2 ) • Now • x1~ (b,f(x1);w,1-u(x1)) • x2~ (b,f(x2);w,1-u(x2)) • Replace x1 and x2 by the equally good lotteries and collect terms • (x1,p1;x2,p2 ) ~ (b,p1u(x1)+p2u(x2); w,1-p1u(x1)+p2u(x2)) • The latter is (b,Eu(x);w,1-Eu(x))

  10. Prospect theory • Loss and gains • Value v(x-r) rather than utility u(x) where r is a reference point. • Decisions weights replace probabilities Max ∑ piv(xi-r) ( Replaces Max ∑ piu(xi) )

  11. Evidence; Decision weights • Problem 3 • A: (4 000, 0.80) or B: (3 000) • N=95 [20] [80]* • Problem 4 • C: (4 000, 0.20) or D: (3 000, 0.25) • N=95 [65]* [35] • Violates expected utility • B better than A : u(3000) > 0.8 u(4000) • C better than D: 0.25u(3000) > 0.20 u(4000) • Perception is relative: • 100% is more different from 95% than 25% is from 20%

  12. Value functionReflection effect • Problem 3 • A: (4 000, 0.80) or B: (3 000) • N=95 [20] [80]* • Problem 3’ • A: (-4 000, 0.80) or B: (-3 000) • N=95 [92]* [8] • Ranking reverses with different sign (Table 1) • Concave (risk aversion) for gains and • Convex (risk lover) for losses

  13. The reference point • Problem 11: In addition to whatever you own, you have been given 1 000. You are now asked to choose between: • A: (1 000, 0.50) or B: (500) • N=95 [16] [84]* • Problem 12: In addition to whatever you own, you have been given 2 000. You are now asked to choose between: • A: (-1 000, 0.50) or B: (-500) • N=95 [69]* [31] • Both equivalent according to EU, but the initial instruction affect the reference point.

  14. Decision weights • Suggested by Allais (1953). • Originally a function of probability pi = f(pi) • This formulation violates stochastic dominance and are difficult to generalize to lotteries with many outcomes (pi→0) • The standard is thus to use cumulative prospect theory

  15. Rank dependent weights • Order the outcome such that x1>x2>…>xk>0>xk+1>…>xn • Decision weights for gains • Decision weights for losses

  16. Cumulative prospect theory • Value-function • Concave for gains • Convex for losses • Kink at 0 • Decision weights • Adjust cumulative distribution from above and below • Maximize

  17. Main difference between CPT and EU • Loss aversion • Marginal utility twice as large for losses compared to gains • Certainty effects • 100% is distinctively different from 99% • 49% is about the same as 50% • Reflection • Risk seeking for losses • Risk aversion form gains. • Most risk avers when both losses and gains.

More Related