1 / 17

Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies

Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies. By David Kelsey. Ad Hominem. To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes the claims that he or she makes . Confusing the person and the claim : Criticizing the person not the claim itself.

orenda
Télécharger la présentation

Critical Thinking Lecture 5b More Fallacies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Critical ThinkingLecture 5bMore Fallacies By David Kelsey

  2. Ad Hominem • To commit this fallacy is to think that some consideration about a person refutes the claims that he or she makes. • Confusing the person and the claim: • Criticizing the person not the claim itself

  3. A personal attack ad hominem: claiming that because someone has certain negative features it follows that a claim she makes is false. Examples Inconsistency ad hominem: to hold that what someone says is false because it is inconsistent with something else she has said or done. Examples Ad Hominem again

  4. Circumstantial ad hominem: holding that because a person’s circumstances are a certain way it follows that some claim she makes is false. Priest example Positive ad hominem: holding that the claim a person makes follows from some positive consideration about the person. Circumstantial &Positive ad hominem

  5. Poisoning the Well • To poison the well • an in advance ad hominem. • For example,

  6. Genetic Fallacy • When one tries to refute a claim based on its origin or history she has committed the genetic fallacy. • Belief in God’s existence • Genetic fallacy vs. Circumstantial ad Hominem

  7. Straw Man • Straw man fallacy: • trying to refute a claim or argument by distorting it or oversimplifying it or misrepresenting it in such a way that it can be easily refuted. • Reconfiguring a claim • Knocking down a straw man • Knocking down a straw man is easy business but knocking down a good argument is not.

  8. False Dilemma • False dilemma • limits considerations to a choice between only two alternatives although other reasonable alternatives are available. • The form of a false dilemma: • Using a false dilemma for the purpose of deception • Example:

  9. Perfectionist fallacy • Perfectionist fallacy • Rejecting a policy or claim because it isn’t perfect. • A kind of false dilemma • Example:

  10. Line Drawing Fallacy • The Line-Drawing fallacy • insisting that a conceptual line must be drawn at a particular point when drawing such a line isn’t necessary. • Examples: • Rich • Bald • Excessive force • Line drawing and Vagueness

  11. Slippery Slope • Slippery Slope: • Claiming that if we let some thing X occur it follows that something else Y will occur, yet there is no reason to think that if X occurs so must Y. • Causation and slippery slope arguments • Example: • Hand gun laws

  12. Misplacing the Burden of Proof • Misplacing the burden of proof: • Misplacing the burden of proof on the wrong side of an issue. • The 2 sides of an issue • Example: • Should we go to war with Iraq?

  13. The burden of proof • To say the burden of proof rests on a claim: • This just means that if one is to hold this position, then she must support it with argumentation. • Example: • Iraq again • Temporal Priority

  14. Where does the burden lie? • Placing the burden • Plausibility: • Example: • Affirmative: • Example:

  15. The burden of proof #3 • Special Circumstances: • Under special circumstances the burden of proof is placed on a particular side of an issue. • The court:

  16. Appeal to ignorance • Appeal to ignorance • claiming that we should believe that some claim is true because no one has proved it false. • Example:

  17. Begging the Question • One begs the question when one of the premises of her argument assumes the truth of the conclusion. • Examples: • Abortion • An argument for God’s existence • Circular reasoning

More Related