Download
1 / 16
160 likes | 318 Vues
Agenda. Introductions and Background Introduction – Paul Giblin Background – Paul Collinge Overview – Geoff Thomas Evaluation Process, Part C Questions Quality – Paul Collinge Financial Risk – Julian Dinnicombe Bid Price – Duncan Ford Questions and Answers Tea and coffee
E N D
Agenda • Introductions and Background • Introduction – Paul Giblin • Background – Paul Collinge • Overview – Geoff Thomas • Evaluation Process, Part C Questions • Quality – Paul Collinge • Financial Risk – Julian Dinnicombe • Bid Price – Duncan Ford • Questions and Answers • Tea and coffee • Devontenders demonstration • Close
Background • DCC committed to care home provision as an essential part of it’s strategy in providing care to an increasing elderly population • DCC wishes to move to a solely commissioning organisation and to cease being a direct provider of services • DCC needs to increase its commissioning of care home services for those individuals with the most complex needs.
Background Contd • DCC wish to commission competitively priced, quality care home services that offer a personalised approach to their residents providing choice and influence over all aspects of their care including leisure and social aspects as well as the opportunity to maximise or maintain their independenceToday is about presenting the opportunity to you and how the Tender is structured and how our evaluation process will operate.
Overview • The Opportunity • The Structure of the Tender • The List of Tender Documents
The Opportunity • Transfer of 19 Residential Care Homes for older people as going concerns through 125 year Lease • Includes integral day care • Transfer of residents and staff • Restrictive covenant • Transitional Spot Contracts and Rates
The Structure of the Tender • Part A - Information and Instructions • Part B - Specification • Part C – Tender Submission
List of Tender Documents • Tender Pack • General Information • Home Specific information • Site Visits
Evaluation • Quality • Financial • Bid Price
Quality Questions Example
Quality Question Evaluation • Bidder 1 passes the evaluation; • Bidder 2 fails the evaluation (scores below 3) • Bidder 3 fails the evaluation (weighted score below the overall threshold)
Financial Evaluation Questions Question 1:.Please describe how your organisation would secure the funding required to complete this deal for the package of lots you describe. Please provide evidence of funding terms, details of your proposed funding structure and if borrowing is necessary of lenders’ commitment, for example, in the form of funding letters and bank letters.
Financial Evaluation Questions Question 2:.Please provide the business plans and associated financial projections for the single lots and packages of lots under consideration. There is an example cash flow template at Appendix 2 which we would prefer to be used as it details the level of detail we are seeking for both the projections and the underlying assumptions. If you prefer to use your own format then please reflect a similar level of detail in the assumptions. It is very important that these projections are the ones that have been used to secure any borrowing required and we would want evidence that any lenders commitment letters referred to in question1 have been based on these projections.
