1 / 14

Joint Ownership of Transmission

Joint Ownership of Transmission. Richard A. Lehman Salt River Project. Background. Joint Ownership Projects have played a vital role in the growth and development of the West and SRP Rapid growth in post war years forced IOU’s and public power utilities to work together

orrick
Télécharger la présentation

Joint Ownership of Transmission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Joint Ownership of Transmission Richard A. Lehman Salt River Project

  2. Background • Joint Ownership Projects have played a vital role in the growth and development of the West and SRP • Rapid growth in post war years forced IOU’s and public power utilities to work together • SRP has been involved in the development of jointly owned generation and transmission projects for nearly 50-years

  3. Benefits of Joint Ownership • Economy of scales offered by larger projects • Better control and oversight of expenses • Lower Cost - expenditures are cost based • Easier to match capacity needs to anticipated growth

  4. Principles of Joint Ownership Projects • Owned by Participants (“tenants in common”) • Owners allocated transmission entitlement based on their participation level (% or MW) • Owners independently administer their share of allocated transmission entitlement • Costs & expenses shared proportionally • Capital expenditures • O&M expenditures • Owners participate in oversight & administration • Engineering & Operating Committee • Ad Hoc Committees

  5. Principles (continued) • Owners approve • Budgets • Major expenditures • Significant operational matters • Approvals subject to defined voting process • Designated Project Manager/Operating Agent • Typically one of the owners • Takes direction from the owners • Owners indemnify each other • Liabilities incurred are shared proportionally • Interconnections require approval/signature of all owners

  6. Scale in Miles 0 50 75 100 SASKATCHEWAN WASHINGTON WECCJOINT FACILITIES(DEVELOPED OR OWNED) MONTANA NORTHDAKOTA OREGON IDAHO LEGEND: SOUTHDAKOTA WYOMING WECC BOUNDARY NEBRASKA JOINT DC TIES JOINT PHASESHIFTER OPERATION NEVADA JOINT LINES UTAH JOINT POWER GENERATION KANSAS COLORADO CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA ARIZONA NEWMEXICO TEXAS BAJACALIFORNIANORTE SONORA CHIHUAHUA SOURCE: POWERmap

  7. Development • Jointly-owned transmission projects have historically been developed in conjunction with jointly-owned generation projects • Generation located in remote locations • Transmission additions necessary to deliver generation entitlement to load center of project participants • Jointly-owned transmission projects more recently developed to access market hubs

  8. Development (continued) • Some Examples • Mohave Project (Generation & Transmission) • Four Corners Project (Gen & Transmission) • Navajo Project (Generation & Transmission) • Palo Verde Project (Gen & Transmission) • Mead-Phoenix Project (Transmission Only) • Rudd Project (Transmission Only) • Southeast Valley Project (Transmission Only)

  9. Sub-Regional Planning • WECC sub-regional planning organizations • SWAT (SW Area Transmission) • STEP (SW Transmission Expansion Planning) • CCPG (Colorado Coordination Planning Group) • RMAT (Rocky Mtn Area Transmission System) • NTAC (NW Transmission Assessment Committee) • CAISO (California Independent System Operator)

  10. Sub-Regional Planning (continued) • Central Arizona Transmission Study (CATS) was genesis for current sub-regional planning groups • Organized to study needs of specific region • Participation open to all interested parties • Participants have input to study scope and assist in performance of study work • Process allows: • Consolidation of multi-party needs • Study of a broad range of scenarios and alternatives • Leads to solutions that maximize benefits to the most parties in the region

  11. Southeast Valley Project • First project to be developed from the sub-regional planning process • 500 kV transmission line from Palo Verde area to the SE Phoenix metropolitan area/Pinal County, AZ • Participants • Arizona Public Service Company • Electrical District No. 2 (Pinal County) • Electrical District No. 3 (Pinal County) • Electrical District No. 4 (Pinal County) • Southwest Transmission Cooperative • Salt River Project • Tucson Electric Power Company

  12. Contact Information For additional information please contact: Richard Lehman Principal Contract Analyst Regulatory Affairs and Contracts Salt River Project (602) 236-3022 ralehman@srpnet.com

More Related