1 / 57

Processing Intelligence Feeds with Open Source Software

Processing Intelligence Feeds with Open Source Software. Chris Horsley, SC Leung, Tomas Lima, L. Aaron Kaplan, Raphael Vinot. Overview. Current topics in automatic incident handling for CERTs IFAS HKCERT , IFAS and use-cases IHAP project ContactDB project Current R&D. IFAS.

orsen
Télécharger la présentation

Processing Intelligence Feeds with Open Source Software

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Processing Intelligence Feeds with Open Source Software Chris Horsley, SC Leung, Tomas Lima, L. Aaron Kaplan, Raphael Vinot

  2. Overview • Current topics in automatic incident handling for CERTs • IFAS • HKCERT , IFAS and use-cases • IHAP project • ContactDB project • Current R&D

  3. IFAS • Information Feed Analysis System

  4. Knowing what’s going on

  5. How do national CSIRTs know what’s happening? • National CSIRTs need visibility on network in their economy • However, many national CSIRTs don’t operate networks themselves, and normally don’t have global (or any) direct visibility • How does the CSIRT know what’s going on in their country?

  6. The kindness of strangers • Luckily, there are a lot of network operators, research teams, vendors, and other CSIRTs out there that collect information, and will share it with national CSIRTs. • And here comes the “but”...

  7. So much data, so many formats • There are many feeds, all with their own data formats and mediums: • Formats: CSV, JSON, XML, STIX, IODEF • Mediums: HTML, RSS, email, HTTP APIs • While there are efforts to standardise data formats, this will take a long time, and will likely never cover 100% of feeds • We can’t change the format of remote feeds - we can only change what we do with the data.

  8. The need for standards • Different feeds use many terms to mean the same thing: • ip, source_ip, src_ip, endpoint, attacker_ip, cnc_ip... • If we receive events from many feeds, we need to normalise so we can compare them together.

  9. The need for storage • As a national CSIRT, we’re concerned with the health of national networks: which means measurement. • We can only measure longterm if we store events, enabling us to analyse them. • We also want to search through events, like: • C&C servers in domestic networks in last week • Bots infected with Trojan.abc on BigISP • Defaced web sites targeting gov.zz

  10. Need for automation • There’s way too much network event data out there to manually process • Options: • a) use lots of analyst time doing tedious log processing • b) write lots of small, independent scripts • c) ignore inbound logs completely • d) use an automated processing system

  11. So what do we need? • We need something which automatically: • Gathers many different types of feeds • Normalises the data in those feeds • Stores that data somewhere • Allows search and performs statistical analysis

  12. IFAS • IFAS = Information Feed Analysis System • Project sponsored by HKCERT and developed by HKCERT and CSIRT Foundry • An integration of open source tools, released as open source for CSIRTs

  13. Architecture

  14. Architecture • Abusehelper: gather, process, and enrich feeds, generate events • Logstash: process and normalise feeds • Elasticsearch: store events in schema-free index server • Kibana: search through events • IFAS Reporter: get overall statistics, build realtime dashboards

  15. Kibana event searches

  16. Freeform statistical reporting

  17. Nesting, filtering, deduplication

  18. IFAS – Dashboard *Drill down right at the chart • Visualize information

  19. What you need to start

  20. Software • Open source under Apache 2.0 License • Only possible with the hard work released under open source licenses from Abusehelper and Elasticsearch teams • Contributions, bug reports, feature requests most welcome!

  21. Hardware • Production: 8-16GB memory machine • Dev: 4GB possible • Multi-core machine (4+ ideal) • Runs in a VM no problem

  22. Out of the box feeds Out of Box Feed Plugins (4 publicly available) • Abuse.ch • CleanMX • Millersmiles • Phishtank Other developed Plugins • Malc0de • Malicious Domain List • Arbor SRF • Shadowserver • Zone-H Future … more, and your own

  23. Where to get it • Currently under closed pilot to trusted CSIRTs • Eventually public release • Please contact contact@ifas.io for details

  24. Demos

  25. IFAS and Use Cases SC Leung, HKCERT

  26. Give a sense of Today’s Events

  27. IFAS - Log Search • Powerful search on all the information collected Feed Details Keywords here Add columns of interests

  28. IFAS - Reporter • Statistical analysis-Trends & Distributions • Free form statistical reports 3. 4. 5. 2. 1. 6.

  29. Nesting, filtering, deduplication Number of phishings in “.AU” in each ASN by brand

  30. IFAS - Alert • Set tracking criteria – get notify ASAP • domain: *.gov.hk • Alert lists : educational institutions (hkedu), NGOs (hkorg) !

  31. Dashboard Real-time situational awareness for CERT management

  32. Public Situational Awarenesson Compromised Servers / PCs

  33. Hong Kong Security Watch Report

  34. Analysis of Trend with Events • Correlate Cryptolocker 2013-Oct with Zeus

  35. Engage ISPs for large scale incident handling ISP • Data do help HKCERT engaging ISPs (their sales team) • Data do help a server hosting SP understand their customers’ security problems

  36. Converting security events into incident reports • Defacement • Phishing •  Export to CSV for batch processing, with some other scripts • Malware hosting – a bit difficult • Large volume of incidents – need prioritisation

  37. Future of IFAS - a collaboration platform • All you can use • All you can contribute • Add input filters for new feeds • Add new plug-in modules • Add new chart and visualization • Integrate with other systems, e.g. RTIR • … • Standard language: STIX, taxonomy of ENISA

  38. DSMS (Decision Support & Monitoring System) • An ongoing project that turn security events into Actionable Data • Set Priority, Choose Monitors, Consolidate Results Monitoring Services Profile Status Check (HTTP, DNS) via proxy Input  URL Tasks Status ? Interface Module Decision Support Sub-system (online /offline) Interfaces to Monitors Interface Module Public analysis sys (VirusTotal, ThreatExpert) IFAS Request to monitor Interface Modules Story Private analysis sys Interface Modules Web reputation (D-Shield) Incident Mgmt Output Consolidated Results

  39. Incident handling automation project IHAP

  40. IHAP • Very similar to IFAS, developed in parallel by CERT.pt, CERT.at • Also uses Logstash, Elastic Search and Abusehelper • Less work on the Webinterface, more work on Ontology, „Data harmonisation document“

  41. IHAP - History • Discussions about CERT.AT developments/documents • Discussions about cooperation between CERTs • ENISA support

  42. IHAP - Goals • Open Source • Maintainable • Flexible and Modular - must be possible to integrate existing software and modules (Pastemon, AbuseHelper, etc..) • Reusable • Easily Extendable - should require little knowledge and basic programming skills • Easily Deployable • Easily Updatable – easy to share new developments with other CERTs and update the system with that new code • Easily Configurable - config files that can be easily modified to fit CERT‘s needs • Documented - must be well documented

  43. Links & Code http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/cert/support/incident-handling-automation

  44. Common field names for AH • https://bitbucket.org/clarifiednetworks/abusehelper/wiki/Data%20Harmonization%20Ontology • A standard set of well defined field names within Abusehelper (AH) • Allows CERTs to: • Write bots which are interoperable within AH • Measure in identical ways • Easier to parse different feeds („generic santizer bot“) : you just have to define the mappings

  45. contactDB

  46. Background/ problem • abuse@ lookups suck (IRT object not in use, no standard; Just now RIPE DB is changing with abuse-c:) • Getting the right lookup is non-trivial, complex • Many (national) CERTs create their own abuse contact lookup DBs. • National CERT DB, TI directory, FIRST data can not be looked up automatically via scripts.

  47. Idea • A caching contact database with more specific internal data • Some of this data (tel nos, etc) will never be in the public whois • Unify with TI, FIRST etc data • Make it query-able by scripts

More Related