1 / 51

ECE 598: The Speech Chain

ECE 598: The Speech Chain. Lecture 12: Information Theory. Today. Information Speech as Communication Shannon’s Measurement of Information Entropy Entropy = Average Information “Complexity” or “sophistication” of a text Conditional Entropy

ovidio
Télécharger la présentation

ECE 598: The Speech Chain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECE 598: The Speech Chain Lecture 12: Information Theory

  2. Today • Information • Speech as Communication • Shannon’s Measurement of Information • Entropy • Entropy = Average Information • “Complexity” or “sophistication” of a text • Conditional Entropy • Conditional Entropy = Average Conditional Information • Example: Confusion Matrix, Articulation Testing • Conditional Entropy vs. SNR • Channel Capacity • Mutual Information = Entropy – Conditional Entropy • Channel Capacity = max{Mutual Information} • Finite State Language Models • Grammars • Regular Grammar = Finite State Grammar = Markov Grammar • Entropy of a Finite State Grammar • N-Gram Language Models • Maximum-Likelihood Estimation • Cross-Entropy of Text given its N-Gram

  3. Information

  4. Speech as Communication I said these words: […,wn,…] Acoustic Noise, Babble, Reverberation, … I heard these words: […,ŵn,…] • wn, ŵn = words selected from vocabulary V • Size of the vocabulary, |V|, is assumed to be finite. • No human language has a truly finite vocabulary!!! • For a more accurate analysis, we should do a phoneme-by-phoneme analysis, i.e., wn, ŵn= phonemes in language V • If |V| is finite, then we can define p(wn|hn): • hn = all relevant history, including • previous words of the same utterance, w1,…,wn-1 • Dialog history (what did the other talker just say?) • Shared knowledge, e.g., physical knowledge, cultural knowledge • 0 ≤ p(wn|hn) ≤ 1 • Swn in V p(wn|hn) = 1 + Noisy Speech Speech (Acoustic Signal)

  5. Shannon’s Criteria for a Measure of “Information” Information should be… • Non-negative • I(wn|hn) ≥ 0 • Zero if a word is perfectly predictable from its history • I(wn|hn) = 0 if and only if p(wn|hn) = 1 • Large for unexpected words • I(wn|hn) is large if p(wn|hn) is small • Additive • I(wn-1,wn) = I(wn-1) + I(wn)

  6. Shannon’s Measure of Information All of the criteria are satisfied by the following definition of information: I(wn) = loga(1/p(wn|hn)) = -loga p(wn|hn)

  7. Information Information is… • Non-negative: p(wn|hn)<1  logap(wn|hn)<0  I(wn|hn)>0 • Zero if a word is perfectly predictable: p(wn|hn)=1  logap(wn|hn)=0  I(wn|hn)=0 • Large if a word is unpredictable: I(wn)= -logap(wn|hn) large if p(wn|hn) small • Additive: p(wn-1,wn) = p(wn-1)p(wn) -logap(wn-1,wn) = -logap(wn-1) -logap(wn) I(wn-1,wn) = I(wn-1) + I(wn)

  8. Bits, Nats, and Digits • Consider a string of random coin tosses, “HTHHHTTHTHHTTT” • p(wn|hn) = ½ • -log2 p(wn|hn) = 1 bit of information/symbol • -ln p(wn|hn) = 0.69 nats/bit • -log10 p(wn|hn) = 0.3 digits/bit • Consider a random string of digits, “49873417” • p(wn|hn) = 1/10 • -log10 p(wn|hn) = 1 digit/symbol • -log2 p(wn|hn) = 3.32 bits/digit • -ln p(wn|hn) = 2.3 nats/digit • Unless otherwise specified, information is usually measured in bits I(w|h) = -log2 p(w|h)

  9. Entropy

  10. Entropy = Average Information • How unpredictable is the next word? • Entropy = Average Unpredictability H(p) = Sw p(w) I(w) H(p) = -Sw p(w) log2p(w) • Notice that entropy is not a function of the word, w… • It is a function of the probability distribution, p(w)

  11. Example: Uniform Source • Entropy of a coin toss: H(p) = -p(“heads”)log2p(“heads”)-p(“tails”)log2p(“tails”) =-0.5 log2(0.5)-0.5 log2(0.5) = 1 bit/symbol • Entropy of uniform source with N different words: p(w) = 1/N H(p) = - Sw=1N p(w)log2p(w) = log2N • In general: if all words are equally likely, then the average unpredictability (“entropy”) is equal to the unpredictability of any particular word (the “information” conveyed by that word): log2N bits.

  12. Example: Non-Uniform Source • Consider the toss of a weighted coin, with the following probabilities: p(“heads”) = 0.6 p(“tails”) = 0.4 • Information communicated by each word: I(“heads”) = -log2 0.6 = 0.74 bits I(“tails”) = -log2 0.4 = 1.3 bits • Entropy = average information H(p) = -0.6 log2(0.6)-0.4 log2(0.4) = 0.97 bits/symbol on average • The entropy of a non-uniform source is always less than the entropy of a uniform source with the same vocabulary. • Entropy of a uniform source, N-word vocabulary, is log2N bits • Information conveyed by a likely word is less than log2N bits • Information conveyed by an unlikely word is more than log2N bits --- but that word is unlikely to occur!

  13. Example: Deterministic Source • Consider the toss of a two-headed coin, with the following probabilities: p(“heads”) = 1.0 p(“tails”) = 0.0 • Information communicated by each word: I(“heads”) = -log2 1.0 = 0 bits I(“tails”) = -log2 0.0 = infinite bits!! • Entropy = average information H(p) = -1.0 log2(1.0)-0.0 log2(0.0) = 0 bits/symbol on average • If you know in advance what each word will be… • then you gain no information by listening to the message. • The “entropy” (average information per symbol) is zero.

  14. Example: Textual Complexity Twas brillig, and the slithy toves did gyre and gimble in the wabe… • p(w) = 2/13 for w=“and,” w=“the” • p(w) = 1/13 for the other 9 words H(p) = -Swp(w)log2p(w) = -2(2/13)log2(2/13)-9(1/13)log2(1/13) = 3.4 bits/word

  15. Example: Textual Complexity How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? • p(w) = 2/13 for “wood, a, woodchuck, chuck” • p(w) = 1/13 for the other 5 words H(p) = -Swp(w)log2p(w) = -4(2/13)log2(2/13)-5(1/13)log2(1/13) = 3.0 bits/word

  16. Example: The Speech Channel How much wood wood a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood? • p(w) = 5/15 for w=“wood” • p(w) = 4/15 for w=“chuck” • p(w) = 2/15 for w=“a” • p(w) = 1/15 for “how, much, if, could” H(p) = -Swp(w)log2p(w) = 2.5 bits/word

  17. Conditional Entropy (Equivocation)

  18. Conditional Entropy = Average Conditional Information • Suppose that p(w|h) is “conditional” upon some history variable h. Then the information provided by w is I(w|h) = -log2 p(w|h) • Suppose that we also know the probability distribution of the history variable, p(h) • The joint probability of w and h is p(w,h) = p(w|h)p(h) • The average information provided by any word, w, averaged across all possible histories, is the “conditional entropy” H(p(w|h)): H(p(w|h)) = SwSh p(w,h) I(w|h) = -Sh p(h) Sw p(w|h) log2p(w|h)

  19. Example: Communication I said these words: […,wn,…] Acoustic Noise, Babble, Reverberation, … I heard these words: […,ŵn,…] • Suppose w, ŵ are not always the same • … but we can estimate the probability p(ŵ|w) • Entropy of the source is H(p(w)) = -Sw p(w) log2p(w) • Conditional Entropy of the received information is H(p(ŵ|w)) = -Swp(w) Sŵ p(ŵ|w) log2p(ŵ|w) • Conditional Entropy of Received Message given the Transmitted Message is called Equivocation + Noisy Speech Speech (Acoustic Signal)

  20. Example: Articulation Testing “a tug” “a sug” “a fug” Acoustic Noise, Babble, Reverberation, … “a tug” “a thug” “a fug” • The “caller” reads a list of nonsense syllables • Miller and Nicely, 1955: only one consonant per utterance is randomized • Fletcher: CVC syllables, all three phonemes are randomly selected • The “listener” writes down what she hears • The lists are compared to compute p(ŵ|w) + Noisy Speech Speech (Acoustic Signal)

  21. Confusion Matrix: Consonants at -6dB SNR(Miller and Nicely, 1955) Perceived (ŵ) Called (w)

  22. Conditional Probabilities p(ŵ|w), 1 signif. dig.(Miller and Nicely, 1955) Perceived (ŵ) Called (w)

  23. Example: Articulation Testing, -6dB SNR • At -6dB SNR, p(ŵ|w) is nonzero for about 4 different possible responses • The equivocation is roughly H(p(ŵ|w)) = -Swp(w) Sŵ p(ŵ|w) log2p(ŵ|w) = -Sw (1/18) Sŵ (1/4) log2 (1/4) = -18(1/18)4(1/4)log2(1/4) = 2 bits

  24. Example: Perfect Transmission • At very high signal to noise ratio (for humans, SNR > 18dB)… • The listener understands exactly what the talker said: • p(ŵ|w)=1 (for ŵ=w) or • p(ŵ|w)=0 (for ŵ≠w) • So H(p(ŵ|w))=0 --- zero equivocation • Meaning: If you know exactly what the talker said, then that’s what you’ll write; there is no more randomness left

  25. Example: No Transmission • At very low signal to noise ratio (for humans, SNR < minus 18dB)… • The listener doesn’t understand anything the talker said: • p(ŵ|w)=p(ŵ) • The listener has no idea what the talker said, so she has to guess. • Her guesses follow the natural pattern of the language: she is more likely to write /s/ or /t/ instead of /q/ or /ð/. • So H(p(ŵ|w))=H(p(ŵ))=H(p(w)) --- conditional entropy is exactly the same as the original source entropy • Meaning: If you have no idea what the talker said, then you haven’t learned anything by listening

  26. Equivocation as a Function of SNR Region 1: No Transmission; Random Guessing Equivocation = Entropy of the Language Dashed Line = Entropy of the Language (e.g., for 18-consonant articulation testing, source entropy H(p(w))=log218 bits) Equivocation (Bits) Region 2: Equivocation depends on SNR Region 3: Error-Free Transmission Equivocation = 0 -18dB 18dB SNR

  27. Mutual Information, Channel Capacity

  28. Definition: Mutual Information • On average, how much information gets correctly transmitted from caller to listener? • “Mutual Information” = • Average Information in the Caller’s Message • …minus… • Conditional Randomness of the Listener’s Perception • I(p(ŵ,w)) = H(p(w)) – H(p(ŵ|w))

  29. Listeners use Context to “Guess” the Message Consider gradually increasing the complexity of the message in a noisy environment • Caller says “yes, yes, no, yes, no.” Entropy of the message is 1 bit/word; listener gets enough from lip-reading to correctly guess every word. • Caller says “429986734.” Entropy of the message is 3.2 bits/word; listener can still understand just by lip reading. • Caller says “Let’s go scuba diving in Puerto Vallarta this January.” • Listener effortlessly understands the low-entropy parts of the message (“let’s go”), but • The high-entropy parts (“scuba diving,” “Puerto Vallarta”) are completely lost in the noise

  30. The Mutual Information Ceiling Effect Region 2: Mutual Information clipped at an SNR-dependent maximum bit rate called the “channel capacity.” Equivocation = Source Entropy – Channel Capacity Region 1: Perfect Transmission Equivocation=0 Mutual Information= Source Entropy Mutual Information Transmitted (Bits) Equivocation (Bits) Source Message Entropy (Bits)

  31. Definition: Channel Capacity • Capacity of a Channel = Maximum number of bits per second that may be transmitted, error-free, through that channel • C = maxp I(p(ŵ,w)) • The maximum is taken over all possible source distributions, i.e., over all possible H(p(w))

  32. Information Theory Jargon Review • Information = Unpredictability of a word I(w) = -log2p(w) • Entropy = Average Information of the words in a message H(p(w)) = -Sw p(w) log2p(w) • Conditional Entropy = Average Conditional Information H(p(w|h)) = -Sh p(h) Sw p(w|h) log2p(w|h) • Equivocation = Conditional Entropy of the Received Message given the Transmitted Message H(p(ŵ|w)) = -Swp(w) Sŵ p(ŵ|w) log2p(ŵ|w) • Mutual Information = Entropy minus Equivocation I(p(ŵ,w)) = H(p(w)) – H(p(ŵ|w)) • Channel Capacity = Maximum Mutual Information C(SNR) = maxp I(p(ŵ,w))

  33. Finite State Language Models

  34. Grammar • Discussion so far has ignored the “history,” hn. • How does hn affect p(wn|hn)? • Topics that we won’t discuss today, but that computational linguists are working on: • Dialog context • Shared knowledge • Topics that we will discuss: • Previous words in the same utterance: p(wn|w1,…,wn-1) ≠ p(wn) • A grammar = something that decides whether or not (w1,…,wN) is a possible sentence. • Probabilistic grammar = something that calculates p(w1,…,wN)

  35. Grammar • Definition: A Grammar, G, has four parts G = { S, N, V, P } • N = A set of “non-terminal” nodes • Example: N = { Sentence, NP, VP, NOU, VER, DET, ADJ, ADV } • V = A set of “terminal” nodes, a.k.a. a “vocabulary” • Example: V = { how, much, wood, would, a } • S = The non-terminal node that sits at the top of every parse tree • Example: S = { Sentence } • P = A set of production rules • Example (CFG in “Chomsky normal form”): Sentence = NP VP NP = DET NP NP = ADJ NP NP = NOU NOU = wood NOU = woodchuck

  36. Types of Grammar • A type 0 (“unrestricted”) grammar can have anything on either side of a production rule • A type 1 (“context sensitive grammar,” CSG) has rules of the following form: <context1> N <context2> = <context1> STUFF <context2> …where… • <context1> and <context2> are arbitrary unchanged contexts • N is an arbitrary non-terminal, e.g., “NP” • STUFF is an arbitrary sequence of terminals and non-terminals, e.g., “the big ADJ NP” would be an acceptable STUFF • A type 2 grammar (“context free grammar,” CFG) has rules of the following form: N = STUFF • A type 3 grammar (“regular grammar,” RG) has rules of the following form: N1 = T1 N2 • N1, N2 are non-terminals • T1 is a terminal node – a word! • Acceptable Example: NP = the NP • Unacceptable Example: Sentence = NP VP

  37. Regular Grammar = Finite State Grammar (Markov Grammar) • Let every non-terminal be a “state” • Let every production rule be a “transition” • Example: • S = a S • S = woodchuck VP • VP = could VP • VP = chuck NP • NP = how QP • QP = much NP • NP = wood QP how could much a woodchuck chuck wood S VP NP END

  38. Probabilistic Finite State Grammar • Every production rule has an associated conditional probability: p(production rule | LHS nonterminal) • Example: • S = a S 0.5 • S = woodchuck VP 0.5 • VP = could VP 0.7 • VP = chuck NP 0.3 • NP = how QP 0.4 • QP = much NP 1.0 • NP = wood 0.6 how (0.4) QP could (0.7) much (1.0) a (0.5) woodchuck (0.5) chuck (0.3) wood (0.6) S VP NP END

  39. Calculating the probability of text how (0.4) QP could (0.7) • p(“a woodchuck could chuck how much wood”) = (0.5)(0.5)(0.7)(0.3)(0.4)(1.0)(0.6) = 0.0126 • p(“woodchuck chuck wood”) = (0.5)(0.3)(0.6) = 0.09 • p(“A woodchuck could chuck how much wood. Woodchuck chuck wood.”) = (0.0126)(0.09) = 0.01134 • p(some very long text corpus) = p(1st sentence)p(2nd sentence)… much (1.0) a (0.5) woodchuck (0.5) chuck (0.3) wood (0.6) S VP NP END

  40. Cross-Entropy • Cross-entropy of an N-word text, T, given a language model, G: H(T|G) = -Sn=1N p(wn|T) log2p(wn|G,hn) = -Sn=1N (1/N) log2p(wn|G,hn) • N = # words in the text • p(wn|T) = (# times wn occurs)/N • p(wn|G) = probability of word wn given its history hn, according to language model G

  41. Cross-Entropy: Example how (0.4) QP could (0.7) • T = “A woodchuck could chuck wood.” • H(T|G) = = -Sn=1N p(wn|T) log2p(wn|G,hn) = -(1/N) Sn=1N log2p(wn|G,hn) = -(1/5) { log2(0.5) + log2(0.5) + log2(0.7)+ log2(0.3)+ log2(0.6) } = 4.989/5 = 0.998 bits • Interpretation: language model G assigns entropy of 0.998 bits to the words in text T. • This is a very low cross-entropy: G predicts T very well. much (1.0) a (0.5) woodchuck (0.5) chuck (0.3) wood (0.6) S VP NP END

  42. N-Gram Language Models

  43. N-Gram Language Models • An N-gram is just a PFSG (probabilistic finite state grammar) in which each nonterminal is specified by the N-1 most recent terminals. • Definition of an N-gram: p(wn|hn) = p(wn|wn-N+1,…,wn-1) • The most common choices for N are 0,1,2,3: • Trigram (3-gram): p(wn|hn) = p(wn|wn-2,wn-1) • Bigram (2-gram): p(wn|hn) = p(wn|wn-1) • Unigram (1-gram): p(wn|hn) = p(wn) • 0-gram: p(wn|hn) = 1/|V|

  44. Example: A Woodchuck Bigram • T = “How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood” • Nonterminals are labeled by wn-1. Edges are labeled with wn, and with p(wn|wn-1) wood (0.5) could (0.5) how (1.0) much (1.0) wood (1.0) if (0.5) a (1.0) woodchuck (1.0) 0 how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if could chuck (0.5) would (1.0) chuck (1.0) a (1.0)

  45. N-Gram: Maximum Likelihood Estimation • An N-gram is defined by its vocabulary V, and by the probabilities P = { p(wn|wn-N+1,…,wn-1) } G = { V, P } • A text is a (long) string of words, T = { w1,…,wN } • The probability of a text given an N-gram is p(T|G) = -Sn=1N p(wn|T) log2p(wn|G, wn-N+1,…,wn-1) = - (1/N) Sn=1N log2p(wn|G, wn-N+1,…,wn-1) • The “Maximum Likelihood” N-gram model is the set of probabilities, P, that maximizes p(T|G).

  46. N-Gram: Maximum Likelihood Estimation • The “Maximum Likelihood” N-gram model is the set of probabilities, P, that maximizes p(T|G). These probabilities are given by: p(wn|wn-N+1,…,wn) = N(wn-N+1,…,wn)/N(wn-N+1,…,wn-1) • where • N(wn-N+1,…,wn) is the “frequency” of the N-gram wn-N+1,…,wn (i.e., the number of times that the N-gram occurs in the data) • N(wn-N+1,…,wn-1) is the frequency of the (N-1)-gram wn-N+1,…,wn-1 • This is the set of probabilities you would have guessed, anyway!! • For example, the woodchuck bigram assigned p(wn|wn-1)=N(wn-1,wn)/N(wn).

  47. Cross-Entropy of an N-gram • Cross-entropy of an N-word text, T, given an N-gram G: H(T|G) = -Sn=1N p(wn|T) log2p(wn|G,wn-N+1,…,wn-1) = - (1/N) Sn=1N log2p(wn|G,wn-N+1,…,wn-1) • N = # words in the text • p(wn|T) = (# times wn occurs)/N • p(wn|G, wn-N+1,…,wn-1) = probability of word wn given its history wn-N+1,…,wn-1, according to N-gram language model G

  48. Example: A Woodchuck Bigram • T = “a woodchuck could chuck wood.” • H(T|G) = -(1/5){log2(p(“a”))+log2(1.0)+log2(0.5)+log2(1.0)+log2(0.5)} = (2-log2p(“a”))/5 = 0.4 bits/word plus the information of the first word wood (0.5) could (0.5) much (1.0) wood (1.0) if (0.5) a (1.0) woodchuck (1.0) how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if could chuck (0.5) would (1.0) chuck (1.0) a (1.0)

  49. Example: A Woodchuck Bigram • Information of the first word must be set by assumption. Common assumptions include: • Assume that the first word gives zero information (p(“a”)=1, log2(p(“a”))=0) --- this focuses attention on the bigram • First word information given by its unigram probability (p(“a”)=2/13, log2(p(“a”))=2.7 bits) --- this gives a well-normalized entropy • First word information given by its 0-gram probability (p(“a”)=1/9, log2(p(“a”))=3.2 bits) --- a different well-normalized entropy wood (0.5) could (0.5) much (1.0) wood (1.0) if (0.5) a (1.0) woodchuck (1.0) how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if could chuck (0.5) would (1.0) chuck (1.0) a (1.0)

  50. N-Gram: Review • The “Maximum Likelihood” N-gram model is the set of probabilities, P, that maximizes p(T|G). These probabilities are given by: p(wn|wn-N+1,…,wn) = N(wn-N+1,…,wn)/N(wn-N+1,…,wn-1) • where • N(wn-N+1,…,wn) is the “frequency” of the N-gram wn-N+1,…,wn (i.e., the number of times that the N-gram occurs in the data) • N(wn-N+1,…,wn-1) is the frequency of the (N-1)-gram wn-N+1,…,wn-1 • This is the set of probabilities you would have guessed, anyway!! • For example, the woodchuck bigram assigned p(wn|wn-1)=N(wn-1,wn)/N(wn).

More Related